{"app_id":"fyv2a0qw"}

Head-to-head

Poll complete
50 people answered in about 1 hour.
50 US-based respondentsNonfiction readersMay 15, 2021Public
May 15, 2021Public

Q: Which book title would you rather read and why?

Head-to-head poll

Not statistically significant
2nd place
TURN WORDS INTO $250,000 IN 90 DAYS How I Used A Little Book as a Lead Magnet, And How You Can, Too
A
23 votes

46%
PickFu winner
MARKETING FASTRACK $250,000 In 90 Days—The Little Book That Launched A New Business
B
27 votes

54%

AI Summary

We’re still gathering data. Your AI summary will be automatically generated after your poll completes, please check back in a few minutes.

Ask PickFu

Ask natural language questions about your poll to our custom AI engine. Don’t worry, it’s friendly.

Log in as poll owner to use Ask PickFu.
Response flags
0
Keywords
22
14
11
8


Gender identity
22
28
Literary preference
3
47
Age range
11
20
8
7
4
A
23 responses
A

Leading with the large amount of money makes the book seem more appealing

A

I like option A the best because the main title makes it sound like anyone can achieve their goal of making money.

A

This is more eye catching and intriguing. It makes it sound like a guarantee

A

I think this one just sums it up better and it's also more catchy

A

I THINK THIS OPTION IS MUCH BETTER FROM THE WAY IT IS WRITTEN

A

This is language anyone can grasp. The book title is empowering and versed well.

A

It outline the objective and endpoint of the book better.

A

Option A caught my attention quicker and made me interested to know more because it has actions that I think I can take

A

The title is more interesting.

A

I choose Option A because if I were looking to make money from writing this title tells me that is exactly what I can do. It draws you in and then gives you the details. Option A is definitely the eye catcher and the one that I would buy. Option B gives you a generalized title and then tells you how you can make money.

A

I prefer Option A because the title tells me I will need words to make the $250K. That is useful to know upfront.

A

Choice A is my top choice because I like the way the book has a catchy headline to grab my attention. I will want to read this books and get to know more about how I can make that much money in so many days.

A

This engages the reader more by pointing out that they can do it too.

A

I would pick choice A because having $250,000 in 90 Days in the title gets my attention more than having it below the title.

A

I like thinking about how it can change my life

A

This caught my attention immediately, i would LOVE to make 250000 in 90 days and like that this is the first thing i read about.

A

I think A is the more appealing title. The main title of the book being "TURN WORDS INTO $250,000 IN 90 DAYS" is very attention-grabbing and hammers home the point of the book and how the reader can potentially fast-track their earnings.

A

i like "how to" titles in books because it makes it appear more useful

A

I like the title, makes it sound so simple

A

Turn words into money.... This can appeal to anyone. I would go for this over Marketing Fastrack. Option B sounds like you need a degree to use it.

A

This are both good names for the book and seem like that they could help.

A

This description is more understandable and relatable to me. The language clearly says what it's about without having to guess based on unclear statements.

A

Chose A because it tells me more about the book

B
27 responses
B

Looks like it would be a very informative book and definitely peeked my interest.

B

Because it explains what the target audience is in the title (marketing) rather than just turning words into 250k.

B

it sounds like less of a clickbaity scam.

B

Option B sounds more promising to create a business and therefore make money.

B

Option B definitely reads easier. The short title is much better and then the subtitle is straight forward and to the point. It covers everything in a cohesive manner.

B

I think Option B is the superior choice here, simply because it's shorter and easier to comprehend on a first read. I had to read Option A a couple of times to really grasp what it was trying to say (the phrase 'lead magnet' in particular made me think of a magnetic piece of metal), so I wouldn't recommend it.

B

Option B leads me to believe that I can really be on the fastrack to learning and making excellent money in a short period of time. The title and description are believable and the way that they are worded convince me that this is the right book for me to learn how to get this done. I trust that this book will provide me with the information that I need

B

I like the shorter title and the layout of it is nice.

B

I chose option B "Marketing Fastrack" because it was more descriptive and made more sense to me. A title that includes launching a new business has more promise than one that claims to be a lead magnet.

B

This title is concise, using an elongated hyphen to separate major thoughts which allows for a quick scan of the verbiage to assess its value and usefulness. The claims in the title are short and respectful of my decision making time.

B

Option A has way to many words that are in capital letters.

B

The title caught my attention right away, who would not want to make 250.000 in 90 days

B

Choice B is more concise and therefore more appealing to me. Choice A is too wordy.

B

B because I feel like A sounds too wordy and is too long.

B

I think the name in option B is more suscinct.

B

Option A sounds like a money scam that tells people they can earn $250,000 in 90 days. Option B does not claim this in the first part of the title.

B

I chose B because this book title was clear, easy to understand, and specific.

B

I prefer this one as it is short, to the point and makes you wonder about the book.

B

Marketing Fastrack has a catchier ring to it than the other one. It just sounds better. WAY better. It's no contest between the two.

B

I am not sure I would buy either book - they both sound a little scammy. So I picked the one that to me sounded less like some sort of scam. I think all these authors miss the point that if they could make these huge sums of money with "words" in this case then they would not have to be marketing a scam book like this one...they could just say another set of words and make another quarter of a million dollars...because playing their word game would be more profitable than writing a book.

B

I prefer the verbage to the second one, it is more mature for the subject matter.

B

This sounds less scam to me than the alternative thing that is said.

B

I prefer Option B, as the main title is shorter and the description is more clear and straightforward.

B

I would rather read option B because the name and title isn't too long.

B

I like Marketing Fastrack as the title. That is direct and to the point. Then you can read about $250,000 in 9 days. Seems like a better way to phrase this. Good idea as the quick title and then a nice subtitle for this.

B

This is a lot shorter and to the point, so I would get this one. The other one is too wordy.

B

I like the shorter, more concise title. It is short and to the point and would make me curious. I would be more likely to grab this book to learn more.

Subscribe to PickFu+ to unlock AI highlights on every poll.

Or, unlock AI features for this poll as a one-time $29 add-on.

AI analysis (sample data)

Unearth more insights with a detailed poll report, discovering what respondents liked, disliked, and what to do next.

Survey Analysis

Winning Option: Characteristics and Appeal

  • Option B emerged as the preferred brand packaging design, securing 12 out of 15 votes. Respondents frequently highlighted its aesthetic appeal, emphasizing the luxurious and high-quality impression it conveys. The ability to stack packages was a notable practical advantage mentioned by participants.
  • Several respondents appreciated the monochrome color scheme of Option B, which they found less overwhelming compared to more colorful designs. This preference for simplicity suggests that minimalistic designs may resonate well with this group.
  • Additionally, environmental considerations played a role in favoring Option B; some participants noted its reduced plastic usage and recyclability as attractive features.

Key Topics Across Options

  1. Aesthetic Appeal: Across both options, aesthetics were crucial in influencing preferences. Participants often referred to colors and overall design quality when justifying their choices.

  2. Environmental Concerns: Both options had respondents who valued environmentally friendly aspects of packaging. However, while Option A was praised for being reusable and eco-friendly by some, others perceived Option B’s reduced plastic use as more sustainable.

  3. Practicality: Practical elements such as ease of stacking (Option B) or suitability for travel (Option B) were significant factors in decision-making processes.

Hypotheses for Further Testing

  • Investigate whether minimalistic designs consistently outperform colorful ones across different demographic groups or product categories.

  • Explore if environmental messaging on packaging significantly influences consumer preference when compared with other attributes like luxury perception or practicality.

  • Assess how important stacking capability is relative to other functional benefits in various contexts such as home storage versus travel convenience.

These hypotheses can guide further research into understanding deeper consumer motivations behind packaging preferences observed in this survey context.

AI themes (sample data)

Learn what respondents like and dislike about your poll based on sentiments analyzed by our AI.
A

Likes (sample data)

  • Sleek and modern design
  • Large ear cup sizes for comfort
  • Minimalist and streamlined look

Dislikes (sample data)

  • Lack of unique features or standout elements
  • White color may get dirty easily
  • Not as much cushioning as other options
B

Likes (sample data)

  • (Note: There were no positive mentions specific to Option B in the provided survey answers)

Dislikes (sample data)

  • (Note: There were no negative mentions specific to Option B in the provided survey answers)
C

Likes (sample data)

  • Unique and stylish metallic grating design
  • Sturdy and flexible build
  • 'Cool' aesthetic appeal

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'Weird' or unpleasant cone shape for earmuffs
  • 'Odd' overall appearance with metallic accents
  • (Note: Third negative mention not available from provided survey answers)
D

Likes (sample data)

  • Comfortable and sturdy design
  • Aesthetic appeal, including color options
  • Familiarity with the brand's quality

Dislikes (sample data)

  • Negative perception of the brand logo
  • Smaller ear size perceived as less comfortable
  • Design not preferred compared to others
E

Likes (sample data)

  • Sleek, modern, and professional look
  • Comfortable fit with larger ear sections that cup the ears well
  • Minimalist and clean black aesthetic

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'Flat' appearance perceived as less comfortable by some
  • 'Bulky' design disliked by a few respondents
  • Narrower piece near headband' not appealing to all users
F

Likes (sample data)

  • 'Cushiony padding' for comfort over long periods of use
  • 'Solid build' making it durable and secure on the head/ears
  • Preferred neutral colors like black for headphones

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'Large ear covering' may be too big for some users’ preferences
  • 'Separation of controls/buttons' not liked by everyone
  • 'Chrome accent rings on headband' not appealing to all respondents
G

Likes (sample data)

  • Design perceived as high quality and appealing
  • Liked the color, especially the blue
  • Thin padding was appreciated

Dislikes (sample data)

  • Looked flimsy to some respondents
  • Perceived as less sturdy compared to other options
  • Color preference for white or black over blue
H

Likes (sample data)

  • Modern and high-quality appearance with a white design
  • Comfortable padding on headband and ears
  • Sleek and neutral look preferred by many

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'White' color seen as prone to getting dirty easily
  • 'Large ear cups' might be problematic for glasses wearers over long periods of use
  • 'Sturdy design' could be considered bulky by some users