{"app_id":"fyv2a0qw"}

Star rating

Poll complete
48 people answered in about 19 hours.
100 US-based respondentsChristian book readersReligion and spirituality readers
June 20, 2023Public
June 20, 2023Public

Q: Which book title would you read and why?

Star Rating

BETWEEN HEAVEN and HELL The New Science Proving the Existence of God HEAVEN and HELL Groundbreaking Research Providing Evidence of God's Existence ABOVE THE DEVIL'S LIES The New Science for God RISE ABOVE The New Scientific Evidence for God RISE ABOVE A Scientific Examination Confirming the Presence of God

AI Summary

The survey results show that respondents were most interested in titles that emphasized scientific evidence for the existence of God. "Rise Above" was the most popular title, with 13 respondents choosing it as their preferred option. The subtitle "A Scientific Examination Confirming the Presence of God" was particularly appealing to many, as it suggested a factual and unbiased approach to the topic. Other titles that included words like "science," "research," and "evidence" also garnered interest from participants.

Interestingly, some respondents expressed skepticism towards titles that used religious language or made grand claims about proving God's existence. Titles like "Heaven and Hell: Groundbreaking Research Providing Evidence of God's Existence" and "Above the Devil's Lies: The New Science for God" received mixed reviews, with some finding them intriguing while others felt they were too sensationalist or biased towards religious beliefs. Overall, it seems that consumers are more drawn to titles that present themselves as objective and grounded in scientific fact.

Based on these results, further research could explore how consumers respond to different types of marketing language when it comes to books about religion or spirituality. For example, do certain words or phrases (such as those emphasizing science or research) have a greater impact on sales than others? It would also be interesting to investigate whether there are demographic differences in how people respond to these types of book titles - for instance, do younger readers prefer more modern-sounding language while older readers are more drawn to traditional religious terminology? By delving deeper into consumer preferences around book marketing language related to religion/spirituality topics we can better understand what drives consumer behavior when purchasing books on this topic.

Ask PickFu

Ask natural language questions about your poll to our custom AI engine. Don’t worry, it’s friendly.

Log in as poll owner to use Ask PickFu.
Response flags
0
Keywords
26
20
20
19
Rating
‌
‌
‌
‌
‌

Subscribe to PickFu+ to unlock AI highlights on every poll.

Or, unlock AI features for this poll as a one-time $29 add-on.

AI analysis (sample data)

Unearth more insights with a detailed poll report, discovering what respondents liked, disliked, and what to do next.

Survey Analysis

Winning Option: Characteristics and Appeal

  • Option B emerged as the preferred brand packaging design, securing 12 out of 15 votes. Respondents frequently highlighted its aesthetic appeal, emphasizing the luxurious and high-quality impression it conveys. The ability to stack packages was a notable practical advantage mentioned by participants.
  • Several respondents appreciated the monochrome color scheme of Option B, which they found less overwhelming compared to more colorful designs. This preference for simplicity suggests that minimalistic designs may resonate well with this group.
  • Additionally, environmental considerations played a role in favoring Option B; some participants noted its reduced plastic usage and recyclability as attractive features.

Key Topics Across Options

  1. Aesthetic Appeal: Across both options, aesthetics were crucial in influencing preferences. Participants often referred to colors and overall design quality when justifying their choices.

  2. Environmental Concerns: Both options had respondents who valued environmentally friendly aspects of packaging. However, while Option A was praised for being reusable and eco-friendly by some, others perceived Option B’s reduced plastic use as more sustainable.

  3. Practicality: Practical elements such as ease of stacking (Option B) or suitability for travel (Option B) were significant factors in decision-making processes.

Hypotheses for Further Testing

  • Investigate whether minimalistic designs consistently outperform colorful ones across different demographic groups or product categories.

  • Explore if environmental messaging on packaging significantly influences consumer preference when compared with other attributes like luxury perception or practicality.

  • Assess how important stacking capability is relative to other functional benefits in various contexts such as home storage versus travel convenience.

These hypotheses can guide further research into understanding deeper consumer motivations behind packaging preferences observed in this survey context.

AI themes (sample data)

Learn what respondents like and dislike about your poll based on sentiments analyzed by our AI.
A

Likes (sample data)

  • Sleek and modern design
  • Large ear cup sizes for comfort
  • Minimalist and streamlined look

Dislikes (sample data)

  • Lack of unique features or standout elements
  • White color may get dirty easily
  • Not as much cushioning as other options
B

Likes (sample data)

  • (Note: There were no positive mentions specific to Option B in the provided survey answers)

Dislikes (sample data)

  • (Note: There were no negative mentions specific to Option B in the provided survey answers)
C

Likes (sample data)

  • Unique and stylish metallic grating design
  • Sturdy and flexible build
  • 'Cool' aesthetic appeal

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'Weird' or unpleasant cone shape for earmuffs
  • 'Odd' overall appearance with metallic accents
  • (Note: Third negative mention not available from provided survey answers)
D

Likes (sample data)

  • Comfortable and sturdy design
  • Aesthetic appeal, including color options
  • Familiarity with the brand's quality

Dislikes (sample data)

  • Negative perception of the brand logo
  • Smaller ear size perceived as less comfortable
  • Design not preferred compared to others
E

Likes (sample data)

  • Sleek, modern, and professional look
  • Comfortable fit with larger ear sections that cup the ears well
  • Minimalist and clean black aesthetic

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'Flat' appearance perceived as less comfortable by some
  • 'Bulky' design disliked by a few respondents
  • Narrower piece near headband' not appealing to all users
F

Likes (sample data)

  • 'Cushiony padding' for comfort over long periods of use
  • 'Solid build' making it durable and secure on the head/ears
  • Preferred neutral colors like black for headphones

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'Large ear covering' may be too big for some users’ preferences
  • 'Separation of controls/buttons' not liked by everyone
  • 'Chrome accent rings on headband' not appealing to all respondents
G

Likes (sample data)

  • Design perceived as high quality and appealing
  • Liked the color, especially the blue
  • Thin padding was appreciated

Dislikes (sample data)

  • Looked flimsy to some respondents
  • Perceived as less sturdy compared to other options
  • Color preference for white or black over blue
H

Likes (sample data)

  • Modern and high-quality appearance with a white design
  • Comfortable padding on headband and ears
  • Sleek and neutral look preferred by many

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'White' color seen as prone to getting dirty easily
  • 'Large ear cups' might be problematic for glasses wearers over long periods of use
  • 'Sturdy design' could be considered bulky by some users