{"app_id":"fyv2a0qw"}

Head-to-head

Poll complete
50 people answered in about 3 hours.
50 US-based respondentsOctober 11, 2019Public
October 11, 2019Public

Q: You usually spend a lot of time to sign and deliver your documents or use unsafe messengers to send documents. Do you need a service that provides a simple and reliable way to sign and send documents electronically for personal use? http://cryptozzydoc.tk

Head-to-head poll

Not statistically significant
2nd place
Yes, I would use such a product, or already use a similar service.
A
23 votes

46%
PickFu winner
I don’t have a great need to sign and send a lot of documents, I will not use such a product.
B
27 votes

54%

AI Summary

We’re still gathering data. Your AI summary will be automatically generated after your poll completes, please check back in a few minutes.

Ask PickFu

Ask natural language questions about your poll to our custom AI engine. Don’t worry, it’s friendly.

Log in as poll owner to use Ask PickFu.
Response flags
0
Keywords
17
14
10
10


Gender identity
18
32
Age range
8
24
13
2
3
A
23 responses
A

It sounds useful and a good way to save time.

A

I do a lot of contract work and I need to send my work securely to my Clients, this kind of product would be a big help if availbale.

A

I think this would be really useful for professionals

A

This product would be beneficial to me

A

yes i use a service like that

A

It would absolutely help to have e-sign. Having to be in person of fax a document is antiquated and time consuming. Its already proven technology.

A

I need to sign a lot of documents that's why I would use a product like this one. I think my documents would be safe for signing with this tool.

A

I would use a product to make sure my documents are safe and secure when being sent to another person. If I were to send a lot of important documents and I want to make sure that nothing would happen to these documents, I would consider using this service. I want the piece of mind, knowing that my documents are secure.

A

I'd have chosen option b as it would more or less apply to me as a service isnt needed until i have a need for it, so in this case i choose option A as i\d prefer to send important documents with a reliable company than to use and trust an unknown person/cmpany that would deliver at a lower cost or what not. i like being able to track any packages being sent.. ex. usps.

A

Within a reasonable price, it would be a nice product to protect my documents

A

I think that this service would be really helpful and useful. It is something that I would definitely consider getting.

A

A is better than B

A

Option A i have spend the time to sign the document i choice option A

A

Services like these make things like property transfers almost instant. I think it is one of the best things available for people who deal with situations like the ones I mentioned.

A

Option A is the send the document i choice option A

A

i would be concerned about the security but i would be interested

A

option B is best

A

I rarely need anything signed and delivered. It's a good idea should I need it however.

A

i would go for the product which i am satisfied with instead of getting new

A

Yes, I need a product like this for work as I do contracts everyday and Adobe is too expensive for the company to pay for. It would be nice if customers could sign through it without having it themselves.

A

It would reduce my work load . I t would relieve pressure off me

A

I have several family members that live on the other side of the country. Any time I have ever needed to sign anything (for example: estate related paperwork I needed to sign when my Grandmother died), I have to wait for the documents to be mailed to me, then once they are signed, my family members have to wait for them to be mailed back. This can be very inconvenient for everyone involved. In the case of time sensitive material, it can also be expensive since things need to be mailed overnight. Being able to sign and send electronically would alleviate both of these problems.

A

In this day and time it's important to use this.

B
27 responses
B

Option B is bettter than option A

B

I don't need the service

B

I don't send enough documents to be relevant to me, I haven't heard of this idea before so maybe they can be a leader in this service

B

Isn't this a product already available? I thought Adobe had this capability.

B

It's not really something I need, even though it sounds like a cool idea still.

B

I don't have such needs, but if I did, because reliability is so important when it comes to documents, it would be smart to take a look at the service/product.

B

I rarely have a need for this service.

B

It's not for me as I wouldn't use it.

B

Do not need it

B

I personally have no need for it in my private or business life.

B

I'm not in the type of business where I need to sign a lot of documents. A service for this would be an unnecessary expense for me.

B

I rarely need to sign and send documents via online. Most of the time I just print a pdf page and send uncrypted through email or in-person.

B

I, personally, do not have this issue because I do not work in an establishment where I would be handling a lot of sensitive documents. That isn't to say that this is not a product that is needed, just that I would not have need of this myself.

B

I don't use documents very much.

B

I don't really need a solution to this problem at the moment.

B

option A is best

B

It's been a lot of years since I've signed any document. So I would not really have an opportunity to use this. But I think it's great that you're making something that will replace paper.

B

I recently retired from my job, so since I am now home, I do not need such as service.

B

I do not need it, so I wouldnt pay or spend time looking for a service such as this.

B

I dont sign too many things daily

B

I have never needed this type of service but I can see how useful it can be for those who might need this

B

I am a general manager in a retail environment. I would use something like this if I had a need

B

I just don't have a ton of things to send by messenger and don't really sign many documents that I need that much protection for.

B

If it were something I did more of, I would seriously consider using the service! It sounds interesting!

B

It could be helpful for some people. I don't have a need to do this often. The site looks OK. There is no background color.

B

I think this type of product would be helpful. I am greatly concerned about the security of sending documents through email, online platforms, or messenger programs due to security. Depending on cost, this is something that I would definitely consider.

B

There is already similar software and e-verification systems out there. Even if I'd had to use such a service I'd think about other options first.

Subscribe to PickFu+ to unlock AI highlights on every poll.

Or, unlock AI features for this poll as a one-time $29 add-on.

AI analysis (sample data)

Unearth more insights with a detailed poll report, discovering what respondents liked, disliked, and what to do next.

Survey Analysis

Winning Option: Characteristics and Appeal

  • Option B emerged as the preferred brand packaging design, securing 12 out of 15 votes. Respondents frequently highlighted its aesthetic appeal, emphasizing the luxurious and high-quality impression it conveys. The ability to stack packages was a notable practical advantage mentioned by participants.
  • Several respondents appreciated the monochrome color scheme of Option B, which they found less overwhelming compared to more colorful designs. This preference for simplicity suggests that minimalistic designs may resonate well with this group.
  • Additionally, environmental considerations played a role in favoring Option B; some participants noted its reduced plastic usage and recyclability as attractive features.

Key Topics Across Options

  1. Aesthetic Appeal: Across both options, aesthetics were crucial in influencing preferences. Participants often referred to colors and overall design quality when justifying their choices.

  2. Environmental Concerns: Both options had respondents who valued environmentally friendly aspects of packaging. However, while Option A was praised for being reusable and eco-friendly by some, others perceived Option B’s reduced plastic use as more sustainable.

  3. Practicality: Practical elements such as ease of stacking (Option B) or suitability for travel (Option B) were significant factors in decision-making processes.

Hypotheses for Further Testing

  • Investigate whether minimalistic designs consistently outperform colorful ones across different demographic groups or product categories.

  • Explore if environmental messaging on packaging significantly influences consumer preference when compared with other attributes like luxury perception or practicality.

  • Assess how important stacking capability is relative to other functional benefits in various contexts such as home storage versus travel convenience.

These hypotheses can guide further research into understanding deeper consumer motivations behind packaging preferences observed in this survey context.

AI themes (sample data)

Learn what respondents like and dislike about your poll based on sentiments analyzed by our AI.
A

Likes (sample data)

  • Sleek and modern design
  • Large ear cup sizes for comfort
  • Minimalist and streamlined look

Dislikes (sample data)

  • Lack of unique features or standout elements
  • White color may get dirty easily
  • Not as much cushioning as other options
B

Likes (sample data)

  • (Note: There were no positive mentions specific to Option B in the provided survey answers)

Dislikes (sample data)

  • (Note: There were no negative mentions specific to Option B in the provided survey answers)
C

Likes (sample data)

  • Unique and stylish metallic grating design
  • Sturdy and flexible build
  • 'Cool' aesthetic appeal

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'Weird' or unpleasant cone shape for earmuffs
  • 'Odd' overall appearance with metallic accents
  • (Note: Third negative mention not available from provided survey answers)
D

Likes (sample data)

  • Comfortable and sturdy design
  • Aesthetic appeal, including color options
  • Familiarity with the brand's quality

Dislikes (sample data)

  • Negative perception of the brand logo
  • Smaller ear size perceived as less comfortable
  • Design not preferred compared to others
E

Likes (sample data)

  • Sleek, modern, and professional look
  • Comfortable fit with larger ear sections that cup the ears well
  • Minimalist and clean black aesthetic

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'Flat' appearance perceived as less comfortable by some
  • 'Bulky' design disliked by a few respondents
  • Narrower piece near headband' not appealing to all users
F

Likes (sample data)

  • 'Cushiony padding' for comfort over long periods of use
  • 'Solid build' making it durable and secure on the head/ears
  • Preferred neutral colors like black for headphones

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'Large ear covering' may be too big for some users’ preferences
  • 'Separation of controls/buttons' not liked by everyone
  • 'Chrome accent rings on headband' not appealing to all respondents
G

Likes (sample data)

  • Design perceived as high quality and appealing
  • Liked the color, especially the blue
  • Thin padding was appreciated

Dislikes (sample data)

  • Looked flimsy to some respondents
  • Perceived as less sturdy compared to other options
  • Color preference for white or black over blue
H

Likes (sample data)

  • Modern and high-quality appearance with a white design
  • Comfortable padding on headband and ears
  • Sleek and neutral look preferred by many

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'White' color seen as prone to getting dirty easily
  • 'Large ear cups' might be problematic for glasses wearers over long periods of use
  • 'Sturdy design' could be considered bulky by some users