Any play off of the word "results" speaks to a user's intent and desire. "Effects" seems just as likely to be bad as good.

i think resulta sounds the most new and innovative

I liked Option A. I felt the name seemed more powerful and might work better.

Would like to pick option A is best name for vitamins which is attractive and great

I like A because it sounds unique. B does't make me think of vitamins.

Effecta sounds more like a laxative

the other one seems like a side effect

like the way it rolls off the tongue

I would hope to achieve positive results from a product like this, so I think A is the best choice.

Effecta reminds me more of side effects and has a negative connotation while Resulta seems more focused on and associated with positive outcomes.

A sounds better and rolls off the tongue better. B sounds a little harsh and nasally. A also makes it sound like you will results right away.

If I had to pick between both of the names I am going to have to go with resulta because as weird as it sounds I like the idea of having result in the name.

I like the idea of getting results from a vitamin, so this name is appealing. Very nice for sure!

I chose Option A for the brand name because it has the name "result" in it. The word "effect" in Option B has a negative sound to it. For example, if something is to take "effect", it might not work. But the word "Result" positively reflects the product will most likely work.

I think the word Result sounds better than Effect. Result sounds like a good thing and Effect sounds like something bad happened.

this reminds me of the word results which is what I want from a product.

effecta sounds like effective, which is really the bare minimum expectation, the other choice sounds more positive

A is easier to pronounce and spell.

Ok, they both sound lame, but I guess if you are really looking for results in a vitamin, so I pick Resulta+

People take vitamins / supplements to get a result. I think this name fits what a vitamin should be about to a "T".

Resulta sounds like it has tangible results

It signifies the idea of "results."

Resulta actually sounds like a real name. While is tells the consumer you get results, it doesn't say what kind of results. It's still vague enough.

I chose Option A as my favorite because the name "Resulta +" evokes images of obtaining the desired results.

I like this one looks alot like the word results

I chose A because it sounds more like it focuses on the end result.

I chose this option because you want to see the results of your vitamins and that is in the name

To be honest I find both to be very cheesy, but Option A is more clear

People associate results more with their fitness and supplement regime, so I prefer this version.

This choice is easier to say and pronounce.

To be honest I really don't like either. They seem just plain and generic and almost cheesy. I wouldn't take a second look at them on a shelf or on a amazon listing. The name doesn't sound very trusting.

i dont hear about both the brands, just randomly i seletec

People talk about getting "Results" this communicates well that

It is very interesting and good...I like the most

"Resulta" sounds like "Result", like an end goal that I'd be working for and accomplishing. "Effecta" sounds like effect, so it sounds like something that would only work temporarily.

i liked vitamins

I like the word resulta over the word effecta. Seems more appropriate. As in you will see results. thanks

Effecta + sounds more promising.

Because the name conveys that the product will be effective, or that the product will have an effect.

Both of these choices are unconventional. But I think Effecta + sounds more professional and trustworthy.

Effecta + rolls off the tongue much better than Resulta +.

I like results in a name rather than what the effect will be.

I like Effecta + slightly better only because I think it flows a bit better than Resulta +.

B is clever and memorable.

Effecta + really takes it for me here, unique name and carries on the topic well

I think the name "Effecta" sounds better than "Resulta".

I think the names are both similar and I like them about the same. I chose B because effects are maybe a little more relateable in vitamins than results.

I chose B because I like the name of the product better!

Option B sounds like a more powerful name than option A.

This option makes it sound like it will be very effective.

While i think both are a little skewed, i think Effecta + is a relatively good name and would give the impression that the supplements or vitamins were useful

Effecta rolls off the tongue well. I like the notion it suggests "effective".

I chose effecta because it sounds like it is effectual. Resulta sounds like you'll get results, however with vitamins I would hope that they work. I don't expect to see results as much as I'd prefer the effectiveness. Hopefully that makes some sense.

Effecta sounds better because resulta could mean any kind of result.

I like option B. I think that this is a name that would stick with me.

I think choice B is more catchy and easier to say. It also seems more upbeat.

i like the sound of the name. The other one sounds to "medical" or a food product.

I don't particularly like either. but Effecta+ sounds less awkward than Resulta+.

B seems like a more vibrant and catchy name for vitamins. I like it.

I think Effecta+ sounds more scientific like it'll work. Resulta+ sounds like a phony product.

Choice A sounds more like a nonsense word a small child would come up with while trying to say a normal word. B at least sounds like a real name.

It sounds catchier, I want the health effects from vitamins, I don't expect results from vitamins

I really don't like either.

They sound more Effective.

I like B more because I think that it sounds more forward thinking and exciting. I think that A is good too but B just sounds better overall.

Neither is great but at least Effecta + makes it seem like effective Vitamin C, D or whatever. Resulta makes no sense as vitamins are not the result

I like B as it sounds like it has good effects and then some. It just rolls off the tongue smoother.

Of-course Vitamins and supplements are providing benefits to our health and boosting our immune system and all the internal organs to get what is necessary and their work is to do good for human body, so the brand name should relate the product that they give for consumers, hence my choice will be "EFFECTA +" that prominently be the name of the brand.

Effecta sounds more like a real vitamin and supplement company, though both sound like they're prescription only.

I chose B because it seemed like a slightly better name, but not by much. It was close.

I prefer the name in option B because it sounds more relevant for supplements.

Effecta just makes it sounds like it works.

I like this name more because it makes me think of all the positive effects the vitamins would have on my health and how I could feel better about my health and body.

I think that B is catchier, easier to remember, and rolls off the tongue better than A does.

because it is for vitamins i would pick option b effecta because i want the vitamins to be effective. if it was something like a weight loss pill then a would be the better choice.

I prefer option B brand name is interesting and creative than option A.

Makes you think of effects which is convincing that there will be results by using the vitamin / supplement.

because when i buy vitamins and supplements i always check what is the effect to me of what i take.

I like B better because Effecta makes it sound like the product is effective. Resulta (option A) gives me the feeling that I may get results, but they might not be what I want them to be.

I think effecta is much more catchy. Resulta is kind lame in my opinion.

i chose option b because i think of effective when i see this name. if i am taking vitamins and supplements, i want them to be effective in doing what they are supposed to do.

Effecta + sounds better for a brand for vitamins and supplements because it seems like it would be effective.

I like the name because it states its effective and produces desired results at the same time

Both names are weird and obvious play on words but Option B rolls off the tongue more easily.

I like this one a little bit better, but I honestly think that they both sound a little silly. Neither of these names would make me pick up the products.

Effecta sounds easier to say and remember.

It's easier to remember and fits more with the the product itself.

THIS NAME IS MORE POWERFUL THAN RESULTA IN MY OPINION

Effecta +/ Resulta doesn't come off my tongue right; it just doesn't sound good.

Effecta+ sounds a bit better than resulta+, but I think they're both bad names

Effecta makes me think of effectiveness. It's a cool and trendy word. Resulta just sounds like a lame play on the word "result."

Effecta sounds more like vitamin or supplement name to me.

it is ieasier to remember and effectivness is better than results

Effecta implies it's effective. Result in A can be either good or bad result.

Effecta sounds better to me as i want to know it will work and that tells me it will. Resulta sounds iffy on what the results will be

Instincts to select choice B no other reason