{"app_id":"fyv2a0qw"}

Head-to-head

Poll complete
100 people answered in about 4 hours.
100 US-based respondentsMarch 13, 2017Public
March 13, 2017Public

Q: Which consulting company name is more appealing if you are a lawyer wanting to communicate more effectively with your clients and are feeling burnt out?

Head-to-head poll

PickFu winner
Lawyering from the Heart
A
65 votes

65%
2nd place
The Heart Centered Lawyer
B
35 votes

35%

AI Summary

We’re still gathering data. Your AI summary will be automatically generated after your poll completes, please check back in a few minutes.

Ask PickFu

Ask natural language questions about your poll to our custom AI engine. Don’t worry, it’s friendly.

Log in as poll owner to use Ask PickFu.
Response flags
0
A
65 responses
A

This one seems more genuine and real.

A

Seems more professional.

A

I think choice A is easier for people to understand and connect to.

A

this sounds nicer

A

Sounds more genuine. Nice wording usage

A

I like A because it's more active versus passive in it's phrasing.

A

Option A sounds more natural. It also conveys the message more effectively I think.

A

A sounds a little more interesting and earnest.

A

It sounds less jumbled than the other one.

A

Looks more prof

A

I don't love either name but lawyering from the heart has a better flow.

A

The one I didn't pick just seems more artificial somehow.

A

CHoice A has better flow in the name and easier to say

A

it shows that you care

A

Option B sounds "muddled" and dosent make much sense

A

Both options are effective at conveying that there is a desire for the lawyer to communicate more effectively or warmly (and with heart). However, neither option clearly conveys the "feeling burnt out" part at all.

A

This seems to connect more to a person and is more appealing.

A

This one sounds pretty good.

A

The phrasing flows better and seems more natural.

A

The heart centered lawyer sounds as if it may be a medical lawyer only.

A

I automatically get an idea about what Lawyering from the Heart may be, as opposed to Option B where I am a bit confused as to what this may mean.

A

I prefer option A because it fits the message of what the lawyer is looking for but is grammatically correct. Option B does not make sense because it is not grammatically correct.

A

LOL! Ummm...Yeah--OK--Sure. Works for me

A

Option B just sounds a little awkward. A is more natural to say/hear

A

Option A feels like it has more compassion and understanding associated with the name.

A

sounds more emotional

A

More genuine.

A

The other one sounds strange

A

The other sounds like it's describing a lawyer as he already is

A

The other title doesn't make much sense to me. Title A is plain and to the point.

A

The wording is more catchy

A

Option A makes it clear that you are involving feelings as a lawyer, and option B could be misinterpreted as "heart of the issue."

A

A is catchier.

A

I can really relate to this.

A

Sounds more intimate

A

This one sounds better.

A

This sounds more caring and personal.

A

The other option makes it seem like lawyer only deals with cardiac malpractice suits.

A

Heart centered sounds like it might be more about medical lawsuits that have to do with heart issues

A

A - because B could easily be misunderstood as "hart centered" if it's only a bit mispronounced.

A

label it better

A

I strongly prefer A because it sounds like the lawyer will be more compassionate

A

sounds simple and more precise.

A

Don't car to much for either. Option A sounds slightly more personable.

A

Option an sounds like a lawyer specializing in cardiac patients

A

Option A would appeal more to me since this is one of my goals - to communicate more effectively with my clients and true communication comes from the heart.

A

I prefer A because it sounds better.

A

A is more appealing because it says that you are acting from your heart, you are caring and care about others. B sounds more conceited, that you are centered on your own heart, not others.

A

neither actually. sounds like an oxy-moron

A

This title seems less awkward.

A

The other title is very wordy.

A

The other one seems forced

A

Honestly, they are both terrible. Too sappy. But A is a little less so.

A

Lawyering From the Heart sounds like a program a burnt-out lawyer could start on and gain momentum with. The Heart-Centered Lawyer sounds like something for lawyers who are in top shape, not burnt out.

A

The other reads more awkwardly.

A

This sounds more catchy and attractive

A

The other one sounds like you are a medical lawyer dealthing with heart issues.

A

Because it flows better. It sounds more pleasant.

A

neither is awesome, but A makes more sense

A

Option A sounds like it is a company that can help me achieve something. Option B doesn't sound a consulting firm it sounds like another lawyer.

A

I like Option A. It feels honest, and I think I would have no problem trusting this company.

A

This title sounds better verbally.

A

A and I'm sure most lawyers would agree! Lawyers do a lot to make their clients feel as if they care (yes I have experience in the legal arena) and although most are stuffy and ridged they would find this title and relate to it.

A

I actually like both titles, but slightly prefer A since it emotes more of a verb (to do) compared to just a noun in Option B. To me, having an action in the title of the consulting company makes it stand out more than just 'Noun Company X.'

A

I think the first saying is more direct and catchy.

B
35 responses
B

It shows that you are trying to help others, and are caring. I like it!

B

It has a better flow to it and more clear meaning.

B

Lawyering from the heart sounds more like a self-help book than a consulting company. PS I am a lwayer

B

sounds a little better

B

I like B a little more than A. I think it sounds more like a different way of looking at your world or a change in your approach to your job that could better your work life.

B

I prefer B, because it gets the same point across while having a better word flow.

B

it sounds a lot better

B

Neither sounds good to me but this one is better.

B

Choice B sound better/

B

This name is worded as if the lawyer is wanted to do work that is meaningful and to help people. The other name is worded in a way that they are being a lawyer but doing it from their heart. it is subtle but I think this one is better.

B

Is Lawyering even a word?

B

This one just sounds a little more better to say. It rolls off the tongue better.

B

I think Option B sounds more unique than Option A.

B

B puts heart first

B

This seems less corny and more genuine

B

The other one sounds boring.

B

seems more personal

B

The word, "lawyering" is rather unappealing. Being heart-centered is language more people would use.

B

Lawyering is an awkward word.

B

"lawyering" doesn't even sound like a real word although i guess it is. i go with the other option.

B

Lawyering just gives a bad tone for some reason

B

Lawyering sounds lame.

B

Neither title feels right to me, however option B sounds like you are following your heart.

B

Sounds professional and carrying at same time

B

I don't think either works very well for the stated purpose, but this one seems to reflect stated goal better.

B

both sucks but b looks more professional

B

These are both terrible, but this is marginally better.

B

This title is far more professional.

B

It sounds emotional, yet business - like

B

That title grabs my attention. The other sounds like a self help book and doesn't hold my interest

B

Sounds more sensual.

B

Sounds more respectable.

B

It's a bit more catchy and memorable

B

This one seems more traditional and has more meaning overall.

B

it sounds less generic

Subscribe to PickFu+ to unlock AI highlights on every poll.

Or, unlock AI features for this poll as a one-time $29 add-on.

AI analysis (sample data)

Unearth more insights with a detailed poll report, discovering what respondents liked, disliked, and what to do next.

Survey Analysis

Winning Option: Characteristics and Appeal

  • Option B emerged as the preferred brand packaging design, securing 12 out of 15 votes. Respondents frequently highlighted its aesthetic appeal, emphasizing the luxurious and high-quality impression it conveys. The ability to stack packages was a notable practical advantage mentioned by participants.
  • Several respondents appreciated the monochrome color scheme of Option B, which they found less overwhelming compared to more colorful designs. This preference for simplicity suggests that minimalistic designs may resonate well with this group.
  • Additionally, environmental considerations played a role in favoring Option B; some participants noted its reduced plastic usage and recyclability as attractive features.

Key Topics Across Options

  1. Aesthetic Appeal: Across both options, aesthetics were crucial in influencing preferences. Participants often referred to colors and overall design quality when justifying their choices.

  2. Environmental Concerns: Both options had respondents who valued environmentally friendly aspects of packaging. However, while Option A was praised for being reusable and eco-friendly by some, others perceived Option B’s reduced plastic use as more sustainable.

  3. Practicality: Practical elements such as ease of stacking (Option B) or suitability for travel (Option B) were significant factors in decision-making processes.

Hypotheses for Further Testing

  • Investigate whether minimalistic designs consistently outperform colorful ones across different demographic groups or product categories.

  • Explore if environmental messaging on packaging significantly influences consumer preference when compared with other attributes like luxury perception or practicality.

  • Assess how important stacking capability is relative to other functional benefits in various contexts such as home storage versus travel convenience.

These hypotheses can guide further research into understanding deeper consumer motivations behind packaging preferences observed in this survey context.

AI themes (sample data)

Learn what respondents like and dislike about your poll based on sentiments analyzed by our AI.
A

Likes (sample data)

  • Sleek and modern design
  • Large ear cup sizes for comfort
  • Minimalist and streamlined look

Dislikes (sample data)

  • Lack of unique features or standout elements
  • White color may get dirty easily
  • Not as much cushioning as other options
B

Likes (sample data)

  • (Note: There were no positive mentions specific to Option B in the provided survey answers)

Dislikes (sample data)

  • (Note: There were no negative mentions specific to Option B in the provided survey answers)
C

Likes (sample data)

  • Unique and stylish metallic grating design
  • Sturdy and flexible build
  • 'Cool' aesthetic appeal

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'Weird' or unpleasant cone shape for earmuffs
  • 'Odd' overall appearance with metallic accents
  • (Note: Third negative mention not available from provided survey answers)
D

Likes (sample data)

  • Comfortable and sturdy design
  • Aesthetic appeal, including color options
  • Familiarity with the brand's quality

Dislikes (sample data)

  • Negative perception of the brand logo
  • Smaller ear size perceived as less comfortable
  • Design not preferred compared to others
E

Likes (sample data)

  • Sleek, modern, and professional look
  • Comfortable fit with larger ear sections that cup the ears well
  • Minimalist and clean black aesthetic

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'Flat' appearance perceived as less comfortable by some
  • 'Bulky' design disliked by a few respondents
  • Narrower piece near headband' not appealing to all users
F

Likes (sample data)

  • 'Cushiony padding' for comfort over long periods of use
  • 'Solid build' making it durable and secure on the head/ears
  • Preferred neutral colors like black for headphones

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'Large ear covering' may be too big for some users’ preferences
  • 'Separation of controls/buttons' not liked by everyone
  • 'Chrome accent rings on headband' not appealing to all respondents
G

Likes (sample data)

  • Design perceived as high quality and appealing
  • Liked the color, especially the blue
  • Thin padding was appreciated

Dislikes (sample data)

  • Looked flimsy to some respondents
  • Perceived as less sturdy compared to other options
  • Color preference for white or black over blue
H

Likes (sample data)

  • Modern and high-quality appearance with a white design
  • Comfortable padding on headband and ears
  • Sleek and neutral look preferred by many

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'White' color seen as prone to getting dirty easily
  • 'Large ear cups' might be problematic for glasses wearers over long periods of use
  • 'Sturdy design' could be considered bulky by some users