50 Respondents General Population
This is a completed test marketing poll.
The customer received 50 unbiased responses (votes & explanations) from the general population in about 21 minutes.
Using PickFu, customers are able to uncover actionable data from a diverse set of respondents for as little as $20.Create Your Own Test Marketing Poll
50 RespondentsGeneral Population
|9 Responses to Option A|
The second one is more interesting to look at.
I like the :// so people can Identify it as a tech company.
more compact; easier to read; more graphically pleasing
brings the notion of a URL into the logo. very cool
that one is much cooler looking
It looks more modern and I like that it uses the colon slashes for letters.
Options looks more creative to me, because it actually uses part of a internet address
In hindsight it's B. But, after taking a closer look the more original one is A because it is unique and original. The way it is spelled just grabs my attention more.
Option A is slightly less legible but it's cute and clever.
|41 Responses to Option B|
"b" says mozilla - not sure what "a" says
It looks cleaner. The colors are more appealing to the eye.
Straightforward and bold is the way to go.
much better looking in my opinion.
Option B is much clearer and easier to read
Option A doesn't even make sense.
A just seems like it's trying to hard to be techy and wouldn't be understood by most people.
This is cleaner and more professional.
hard to read the other one
I would go with A but I don't like the italicized lls. This is why I go with B. It's easier to look at. It's simpler and in this case simple works.
I think it looks better.
I prefer the red font and I don't like the : in the other
Option B is more simple, while A is distracting with the punctuation.
If I didn't know of mozilla, I would not even know what option A said.
option A appears too broken up, it also reminds me of a spam site, somewhere I would not be inclined to go. B is straight forward and easy to understand.
I like the idea of option A, but it looks just a little too busy, I prefer option B.
I like Option B better because I think it is easier to read and more simple.
Graphically, it's a better design. I also prefer the white on black, to the red on white.
I like the coloring of A, but prefer how b is written. It took me a moment to realize it was a :// not an odd I
I like the clean-cut look of the font....
I think olption A would confuse some people.
left logo is trying to be too cute. right logo is a name we're all familiar with.
the other one is quite annoying and doesn't make any sense to me
I hate this new design. stick with the old one. The new one is trying too hard
option A is a little hard to read
B pops more, while A looks bland.
Think the other one is trying to hard to be unique... too much going on though I do like the individual elements to be honest.
I understand the intent of the one I didn't select, but it's just going to result in confusion.
it's not as insiderish and geeky
I cannot actually read choice A. It looks like Moz: lla. Makes no sense.
B -the red is much more powerful than black and white
it just looks cleaner .... more appealing to my personal eye.
this logo is more familiar to me and the color stands out more
Looks more modern, less "geeky", broader appeal to more people
You can see all of the letters better, the second one has part of one letter missing and not everyone is keen on that.
I choose b because it is more appealing, it grabs my attention more than a
B is simpler and easy to read. A does look like it says mozilla but not everyone will be able to understand it. With the : it seems like :// not a happy brand.
Just stands out. Great color and easier to read.
I like the black and white better on option A but the font is awful so I prefer option B which has a cleaner looking font.
Color and font works better.
its cuter than the other