50 Respondents 1 Child 2 Children 3 Children
This is a completed test marketing poll.
The customer received 50 unbiased responses (votes & explanations) from a targeted (1 Child, 2 Children, 3 Children) responder pool in about about 6 hours.
Using PickFu, customers are able to uncover actionable data from a diverse set of respondents for as little as $20.Create Your Own Test Marketing Poll
50 Respondents1 Child 2 Children 3 Children
|15 Responses to Option A|
loads faster than the other.
There is more detail about the product.
You can watch youtube video which helps to understand the product.
I like the video on A gives more of an idea on the product.
the site is much more informative and gives me more information to make choices
Option A would be more in line for a good starting place for a home page design.
I liked the fact that you could see the players in action, running around. I think that gives you a better idea about what the game entails.
The header image on this rea`lly grabbed me when the page first loaded.
I like the layout better.
This website shows the product in use in a clear way that everyone can understand. I love the retro look.
A. This one makes me more curious and interested.
More engaging and interesting
More information on the front page.
I think that the style of B has more of a "cool" factor to it, but option A made it very obvious what was being offered and was easy to navigate.
Option A shows at a glance that many more people can get involved than is obvious in Option B.
|35 Responses to Option B|
B, this photo is way cool and looks interesting.
This site is less cluttered.
A is more visually stimulating. Hard to figure out whats going on.
Option B looks cooler and gives you a better outright impression of what the game is and what it would entail. People seeing this without knowing a whole lot about it will be more intrigued by seeing Option B and more likely to check deeper into what the game is all about. I think Option B looks better and better explains what you get out of this product.
More free-flowing, interesting, smooth, bigger pictures
I like the close up of the actual kids as the main picture. It looks more intriguing.
B looks much more updated, interactive, and current. A looks really dated and behind the times.
I really like this layout more because it seems interesting and inviting. I also LOVED the background picture. It makes the game look futuristic and interesting.
B looks more professional and attractive.
It's more simple and easier to read.
Option b is more user friendly. It is also laid out better and better visually.
Layout is just more intriguing in this page
B looks cooler but A loads faster
All the smaller pictures toward the top are distracting on 'A'.... 'B' Seems clearer/more to the point at the top of the page
you have to get my attention and b did that
I like seeing the real people up top
This site has a shorter name and would be easier to copy into my browser.
I like that the pictures are bigger.
Both are good - I just like the top section of choice B the best...but both are good.
The layout for option B seemed a lot more interesting and appealing to the eye.
I like the opening screen, because it shows what would be closer to a screenshot I guess because it is dark.
The title itself is already interesting.
in terms of websites names, shorter is always better.
simple and focused. i know where to look and go to find out more. A is distracting.
needs more info
Option B is my choice. I like the kids in the pictures. I like the concept. Providing this isn't a hunger games scenario I like B.
More immersive and wants me to try the game.
This is a better looking image overall. More visually appealing and eye catching.
Catches attention quicker
Good sounding name and doesn't drag on like the other option
More cooler looking and catchy
It feels less cluttered, information is easier to process for me.
Straight and to the point. Can search from the main page.
I think B is a little less "busy" than A so there's not as much to look at and distract from the main point.
Seems more professional. The other site looks like an a group webpage.