Design Poll Gallery

Actual Design Polls & Poll Results

Which logo for supplements do you like more?

This is a 4 option poll with 100 respondents targeting Amazon Prime Membership (Yes) and Nutritional Supplements (Yes, Some Days, Yes, Every Day). A sample of responses:

• C - The circular logo with the + sign makes it look like something out of an SNES-era video game, where as you had cured your character of something effecting them. This is the most attractive logo due to that likenessB - The _ under the E with the bold text makes this the second most attractive. It is gold and memorable with a nice touch with the _A - The text is too small in this one. Also the All caps in B makes it stand out and deem more dominant than this option.D - The Effecta words are barely legible. It looks like a side comment and not the point of the logo. You need to have your name bigger. It doesnt look like a company that would use such a small-font logo
• When I heard the word supplements, I am thinking the name across the top of a vitamin bottle that it makes me think what is it I want to see. I really like choice B and I could see it written across the top of a vitamin bottle. It's classy with a little hint of something. While I like choice C, now that I look at it again, i don't like the big C. I would switch choice C and A and go with choice A second. I like the lower case letters and the plus sign at the end. What I don't like about choice D is the image of a supplement, it's a little too much. It's big and overwhelming, it might not take away from the products name.

Assuming you like the the product sold on this website, do you trust the store and would you make a purchase? If not, please explain why. And if yes, what do you like about the site? https://lil-paws.com

This is a 1 option poll with 50 respondents targeting Age Range (18 24, 35 44, 25 34). A sample of responses:

• I don't like that the main page isn't clear on what kind of product they sell - I have to click "SHOP" to see that there's a pet carrier. Featuring it on the main page would help speed up my assessment. Having just 1 item like that also seems weird, normally there'd be a couple sizes maybe, or accessories, or swag (stickers/magnets, a t-shirt maybe) for free advertising, if nothing else. As it stands, it looks a lot like the generic template-based websites that harvest user information.
• This seems like a good enough product. I don't care for the website layout though. If the main product is this one carring container, then it shoudl be front and center on the home page, not some sentimental video. It took me too long to figure out what was being offered, and in a real life situation I would have left the page within seconds of not understanding what was being sold. Ditch the intro video and show the product.
• I trust the website but I wouldn't buy from them. The website itself has a modern UI and has a clear presentation to it. Their shop only has one item and it is an animal carrier that I could find somewhere else for cheaper, I wouldn't see how it would make travelling with animals any different from any other sort of carrier.

Which design do you like the most?

This is a 4 option poll with 50 respondents targeting Dog Owner (Yes) and Amazon Prime Membership (Yes). A sample of responses:

• Choice A really seems to be a verifiable brand concentrated on dogs only and makes sense with the leash affiliation in the. Brand. Choice A as also good because it’s a simpleI like the Kelly green and white logo simple clean ,succinct. Hooch b color combination is also good with the addition of the blue and the association of dog / puppy. The last two logos do not resonate with me, I simply do not associate the word leash with a cat and so there’s some confusion of what type of company this is or is it a vet hospital, the silhouetted version choice B is much better than the animals facing each other.
• I love the design of D and it really showcases the goal of the company and what they want to do. Option B is simplistic and is calming to look at you can easily tell what the design wants to tell. Option A makes you think that the service is only for dogs which is counter intuitive to what the company whats to tell, but the design is good. Option C has a green leaf with a water drop for some reason and a grey streak, these things make the design look good but doesn't convey any use to the consumer. the logo should tell you what the company does and C doesn't do that.
• B is my favorite design. I like the dog and the cat togethers and the colors are sharp. A is my second choice, the green background is nice against the white design and lettering. D is my third choice. I don't really care for the blue color of the animals or the two different colors of the words. C is my least favorite. Again, I don't like the two different colors of the words, and if anything leaf should be green and leash should be black. Also the end of the leaf looks more like a rai drop. I don't like this one.

Which one is more suitable to be the heroine of a Texas Hold'em game？

This is a 1 option poll with 100 respondents targeting App Store Spending (Under $10, Over $100, $10 $100), Gender (Male), and Age Range (45 54, 35 44). A sample of responses:

• I believe A is the most suitable, for several reasons. First, she is wearing the bolo-style ribbon bow tie, as opposed to the bowtie or no tie. The bolo ribbon style definitely conjures up Southern--and especially Texan--fashion and culture. It also seems like something a casino dealer would wear. I also believe the higher collar has a modesty that seems Texan or Southern. It's attractive and professional looking without seeming trashy (particularly as compared to the low-cut collar in option B). Option C just looks generic, like a woman who's going out clubbing. C has no association at all to poker or as a heroine to me. I believe option A has a modesty about her that gives her a sort of girl next door/ Charlie's Angel look that seems heroic and fits the Texas Hold 'Em theme.
• I think all images are attractive and stand out, and could suitably be represent a heroine. However, I think A is the best. The string tie she wears is perfect for a Texas hold 'em theme and to give her a distinctive look, as well as the corsette-type thing she's wearing. I think B is also good and I like the flower in her hair to make her stand out. However, the bow tie makes her look like she's just the dealer, and not the heroine. If she's supposed to be just the dealer, then B is the best. But if she's supposed to be a player, or something else, then A is the best. C is fine as well, and I think C's face looks the most intelligent and strongest. However, the overall look is most generic and forgettable.

Which Logo do you prefer, for a new e-commerce Kitchenware and Homeware Brand, and please comment on which colour combination would suit that Logo.

This is a 3 option poll with 50 respondents targeting Gender (Female). A sample of responses:

• I personally like the simplicity of A and B because the designs are smaller and simpler which I think is nice because it fits the idea of a modern, minimalist kitchen design which is popular these days. The reason A ranks higher is because B is a bit light in color so it's hard to see the design. I think maybe a blue and grey could look pretty nice for kitchen ware.
• I like Choice A as my rank #1 because I understand the name of the brand and the U under the N looks like a kitchen bowl. I picked option C as my second choice because it has the whole name but isn't as creative looking as Option A. The last choice was Option B. I didn't know what the half-heart looking design was so it was the least appealing to me.
• I like the logo on option B, the blue background with yellow writing looks really good, I also like the white background with the yellow and blue writing. I like option A a lot also, the white background with the black writing and logo is really attractive and professional. I don’t like the logo for option C, it doesn’t have a professional look.
• I like the soft, rounded lines of B the most. Between A and C, I prefer A because I like that the font and the logo are sleeker. I don't like the boldfaced text in C. As far as the color combination, I think the simple black on a white background looks the cleanest and most simple, which would be ideal for a kitchen- and homeware brand.

Which podcast logo do you prefer? Why? Thank you for your thoughtful feedback.

This is a 2 option poll with 50 respondents. A sample of responses:

• I definitely like choice A over B for several reasons. One, I like the font and the fact that "goal achievement" is highlighted in yellow. I like that it shows the picture of the person that hosts the podcast, I like to be able to know what the person looks like that I'm listening to because it helps me relate to the podcast better. The last thing is the fact that it has start ratings and the reviews. This is one thing that for sure would make me click on this link.
• I like having Matt's picture on the podcast. It gives you a personal connection with the host. The quotes and the five stars also show that the podcast will likely be good, and keep your interest. I like having it right up front. So I chose A. B with the alternating colors actually makes it hard to read.
• I prefer the option that gives me the most information, as otherwise I would not know why to tune in. The highlighter across the middle words also stresses them to make me aware of what it's about and is a good graphic for informing me that I will be learning something important.
• I like both of them. I was kind of drawn to Option B because I like the rainbow colors and everything, but overall I like everything in Option A. It's nice to see the reviews, it has a face attached to it, and I really do like the font and highlighting in the name on Option A.

Assuming you like the product, would you shop here? https://www.goodsash.com. Please explain why or why not.

This is a 1 option poll with 50 respondents targeting Gender (Female). A sample of responses:

• Overall, the site is inviting. Immediately, the color scheme looks feminine. I like that the drop down menu has a curvy section. I'm kind of curvy myself at the moment, and I have friends who are quite curvy and would appreciate it. The selection at the moment seems small, but I imagine that will pick up. I like that the layout is simple, the drop down menus are there to make results a little more narrow, and it seems to be size inclusive.
• I thought the website looks very professional and mature, too much pink makes me think they specialize in pink clothing, I did understand the modest factor, but the pink felt very young and most young women do not wear that much pink and cover up that much, so i am assuming this is for a more mature woman again not seeing all that pink happening, i think the main page would do better with different colors being displayed besides pink
• Yes, I'd definitely shop at this store! I love the thought of a store that specializes in modest women's clothing, which tends to be much more feminine and classic timeless (as evidenced by the photos on the website) than the "trendy" (and sometimes not-so-modest!) women's clothing found at many stores. The prices also look reasonable, based on what I could see. And the free shipping would be a huge benefit!

Which gray colored shield icon do you prefer the most? Note: the gray icon is supposed to represent "Not Applicable".

This is a 4 option poll with 50 respondents. A sample of responses:

• With the shield design representing 'not applicable' the logical top choice is the one where the line strikes entirely across and overlaps that shield. It strikes out the shield entirely instead of allowing the shield to represent strength or a symbol of protection. This is critical if the shield is supposed to represent something that isn't applicable. The second and third choices do this to a smaller degree but could be confused for other meanings since the only addition lies entirely within the shield graphic.
• B was my top choice because the slash through the shield is likely to indicate that the shield is not in play or does not count, does not apply. It seemed fairly straightforward. Option A also had a white slash through the shield, but the gray slash extending beyond the shield boundary could cause some confusion about its meaning. The dash, or negative sign of Option C could also indicate non applicable, but it does not seem a universal as option A.
• The only option that really worked for me was option D. All the other option icons reminded me of an error or a mistake. Not applicable is a tough thing to represent because there is nothing “wrong” when something is not applicable. It is tricky to get an icon to represent the issue as not being wrong. I felt option D was the best one at doing this.

Please rate the design (not the content) of this navigation. Is it easy to use?

This is a 1 option poll with 50 respondents. A sample of responses:

• Everything about it looks intuitive except for the members bit. It is unclear what the members section is for. Are the member names clickable? If so, what does clicking on them do? Are these members of the system or members of the task? What causes a person to show up in the member list? Other than members, the other elements are clear and easy to follow.
• This is a great looking screen where you can see who is in your group, the tasks you need to do, and the calendar and activities are easy to find. The search and explore portion is nice to have at the bottom. It is compact and not too crowded which is good. Very functional navigation bar on the side that appears easy to use.
• This is a great taskbar. I love that there are four different colors. The white words are pretty easy to see and the highlight bar is nicely differentiated. The green color to distinguish the members is a nice touch so I can tell quickly what part of this task bar I want to navigate.
• The design looks good, I will not say that it is perfect because I think there is always room to improve but does cover some basics. Easy to understand, good layout and properly organized. I think as time goes on you'll have more to add on the navigation page as it seems very empty.

Please rate the design (not the content) of this landing page.

This is a 1 option poll with 50 respondents. A sample of responses:

• It seems to be a clean, functional design that is able to clearly explain what the product is and, through the captured screenshot, to explain the functionality of the product and how it works. My only complaint (and reason for subtracting a star) is that I felt that the box around "Where" and the user cursors on the "Where teams design together" text was entirely too "noisy" and distracting. I felt it did not significantly add value to the landing page, and was unnecessary, as I was able to understand the product without them.
• I like the user icons on top of the text phrase. It really gives you the idea of the collaborative nature of the product. I don't like the font of the text though. The cutout on some of the letters are distracting and it is unclear if it is a design element related tot he product or not. Finally, I like having the screenshot at the bottom to get a better look into what the product does. Only real criticism is the font.
• The use of names over the header text is a cute idea but actually makes it harder to read. And though each rectangle toward the bottom is quite crowded, the very clear delineation of sections suggests different categories, though putting all this info on multiple pages may better serve there purpose.

• 100 Respondents Amazon Prime Member Nutritional Supplements - Daily Nutritional Supplements - Occasionally
  Which logo for supplements do you like more?
• 50 Respondents 18-24 25-34 35-44
  Assuming you like the the product sold on this website, do you trust the store and would you make a purchase? If not, please explain why. And if yes, what do you like about the site? https://lil-paws.com
• 50 Respondents Amazon Prime Member Dog Owner
  Which design do you like the most?
• 100 Respondents Male App Store spend: Under $10 App Store spend: $10 - $100 App Store spend: Over $100 35-44 45-54
  Which one is more suitable to be the heroine of a Texas Hold'em game？
• 50 Respondents Female
  Which Logo do you prefer, for a new e-commerce Kitchenware and Homeware Brand, and please comment on which colour combination would suit that Logo.
• 50 Respondents General Population
  Which podcast logo do you prefer? Why? Thank you for your thoughtful feedback.
• 50 Respondents Female
  Assuming you like the product, would you shop here? https://www.goodsash.com. Please explain why or why not.
• 50 Respondents General Population
  Which gray colored shield icon do you prefer the most? Note: the gray icon is supposed to represent "Not Applicable".
• 50 Respondents General Population
  Please rate the design (not the content) of this navigation. Is it easy to use?
• 50 Respondents General Population
  Please rate the design (not the content) of this landing page.