Logo Design Poll Gallery

Actual Logo Design Polls & Poll Results

Which Logo do you prefer, for a new e-commerce Kitchenware and Homeware Brand, and please comment on which colour combination would suit that Logo.

This is a 3 option poll with 50 respondents targeting Gender (Female). A sample of responses:

• I personally like the simplicity of A and B because the designs are smaller and simpler which I think is nice because it fits the idea of a modern, minimalist kitchen design which is popular these days. The reason A ranks higher is because B is a bit light in color so it's hard to see the design. I think maybe a blue and grey could look pretty nice for kitchen ware.
• I like Choice A as my rank #1 because I understand the name of the brand and the U under the N looks like a kitchen bowl. I picked option C as my second choice because it has the whole name but isn't as creative looking as Option A. The last choice was Option B. I didn't know what the half-heart looking design was so it was the least appealing to me.
• I like the logo on option B, the blue background with yellow writing looks really good, I also like the white background with the yellow and blue writing. I like option A a lot also, the white background with the black writing and logo is really attractive and professional. I don’t like the logo for option C, it doesn’t have a professional look.
• I like the soft, rounded lines of B the most. Between A and C, I prefer A because I like that the font and the logo are sleeker. I don't like the boldfaced text in C. As far as the color combination, I think the simple black on a white background looks the cleanest and most simple, which would be ideal for a kitchen- and homeware brand.

Which podcast logo do you prefer? Why? Thank you for your thoughtful feedback.

This is a 2 option poll with 50 respondents. A sample of responses:

• I definitely like choice A over B for several reasons. One, I like the font and the fact that "goal achievement" is highlighted in yellow. I like that it shows the picture of the person that hosts the podcast, I like to be able to know what the person looks like that I'm listening to because it helps me relate to the podcast better. The last thing is the fact that it has start ratings and the reviews. This is one thing that for sure would make me click on this link.
• I like having Matt's picture on the podcast. It gives you a personal connection with the host. The quotes and the five stars also show that the podcast will likely be good, and keep your interest. I like having it right up front. So I chose A. B with the alternating colors actually makes it hard to read.
• I prefer the option that gives me the most information, as otherwise I would not know why to tune in. The highlighter across the middle words also stresses them to make me aware of what it's about and is a good graphic for informing me that I will be learning something important.
• I like both of them. I was kind of drawn to Option B because I like the rainbow colors and everything, but overall I like everything in Option A. It's nice to see the reviews, it has a face attached to it, and I really do like the font and highlighting in the name on Option A.

Which gray colored shield icon do you prefer the most? Note: the gray icon is supposed to represent "Not Applicable".

This is a 4 option poll with 50 respondents. A sample of responses:

• With the shield design representing 'not applicable' the logical top choice is the one where the line strikes entirely across and overlaps that shield. It strikes out the shield entirely instead of allowing the shield to represent strength or a symbol of protection. This is critical if the shield is supposed to represent something that isn't applicable. The second and third choices do this to a smaller degree but could be confused for other meanings since the only addition lies entirely within the shield graphic.
• B was my top choice because the slash through the shield is likely to indicate that the shield is not in play or does not count, does not apply. It seemed fairly straightforward. Option A also had a white slash through the shield, but the gray slash extending beyond the shield boundary could cause some confusion about its meaning. The dash, or negative sign of Option C could also indicate non applicable, but it does not seem a universal as option A.
• The only option that really worked for me was option D. All the other option icons reminded me of an error or a mistake. Not applicable is a tough thing to represent because there is nothing “wrong” when something is not applicable. It is tricky to get an icon to represent the issue as not being wrong. I felt option D was the best one at doing this.

Which logo do you like more for a Vitamin Company? Which logo would make you trust company & buy its vitamins?

This is a 2 option poll with 50 respondents targeting Education (Graduate Degree, Bachelor's Degree), Amazon Prime Membership (Yes), Income ($101k+, $61 100k), and Age Range (55 64, 45 54, 35 44). A sample of responses:

• I prefer the 'red' based logo for a couple reasons. 1) it has a natural feel with the plant in the center and also has a plant edge around the outside. This double meaning reinforces the the natural theme of the product itself. 2) the brand name is in bold font right across the center as opposed to being in a circle around the top. This makes it much easier to read and provides the brand information boldly and first as you see the logo.
• I would have to choose B.. I think the problem with A is the color pallet. On a dark shelf in a store, surrounded by other vitamins.. The orange and reds on the bottle really pull the eyes. Blue on the otherhand is a cool color (temperature color) and really doesn't grab the eyes. Seeing as a product only has a second or two to catch the consumers eye. I would think option B is the better bet.
• I like the logo on Option B better and would trust the company enough to buy the vitamins - the verbiage is the same on each advertisement but Option B grabs your attention because of the vibrant color choices. Option A is an attractive color choice but seems bland when compared with Option B. I would be much more inclined to purchase Option B.
• Either logo would make me trust the company. I chose B because of the way the logo uses the apple for its outline. I also chose B because the name of the company really stands out and that name evokes trust in the product being pure.

Which design do you like?

This is a 2 option poll with 50 respondents. A sample of responses:

• A with the stretched out heart shape is more visually appealing to me. The toes seem a touch too small on both options. The spacing between the letters of SOAK SCIENCE need work. The kerning is not right. The wide spacing on that and moisturizing do not look visually appealing, as they are just spread out too much.
• I chose Option A as my top choice because I think the colors are a tad bit bolder and make the logo stick out and is more eye catching than that of Option B. If I had to buckle down and pick between the two I would definitely choose Option A.
• I prefer this one because it's easier (or at least quicker) for me to relate the icon to soaking my feet. The other icon looks more like a heart, and I might not have made the soaking association at all.
• The feet of the logo in option A are more elongated than those of option B. Since the option B feet are a bit stubby, I went with option A because I felt it was a better depiction of actual foot shape.
• I had to stare at the images for a minute or two to see the difference. I don't really have a preference, but I picked A because the feet are a little longer and I have big feet myself.
• I like the design more of Option A because of the nice heart it forms. The bigger logo catches my attention much more than Option B. I would definitely choose Option A every time.

Which design do you like?

This is a 3 option poll with 50 respondents targeting Amazon Prime Membership (Yes), Relationship Status (Married, Married), and Age Range (35 44, 25 34). A sample of responses:

• C is the best all the way around. The logo is big enough that I can see both the heart and the feet and I can read all of the text easily which makes it pretty clear what type of product this is. A isn't bad, but the font is pretty small to read on this 11" screen. I can only imagine that it would be much worse on a phone or tablet. B is so small that I can not immediately discern what the logo is, nor can I easily read the text.
• I like design option C the most because it has the largest icon so I can see it very well. My second choice is option A because the icon isn't as prevalent; it's a bit smaller than option C. My third choice is option B because it has the smallest icon so I can barely see it at all or even tell exactly what it's supposed to be.
• I chose C first because it was the largest logo and so it was easier for me to read. I then picked A because it was the next easiest to read. I did not pick B until last because it was the hardest to read of the options. I think the bigger logo that is bolder and stands out more was the better one over the other options.
• I opt for the largest design possible. C is the largest, easiest to read, and easiest to distinguish the heart logo. A is the second-largest, and B is the third-largest of three. I appreciate that the heart logo is slightly different in each, but the size of C makes it the best of the three.

Which logo do you like more for a Vitamin Company? Which logo would make you trust company & buy its products?

This is a 3 option poll with 50 respondents targeting Nutritional Supplements (Yes, Every Day, Yes, Some Days), Amazon Prime Membership (Yes), Ethnicity (White), and Age Range (65 74, 55 64, 45 54, 35 44). A sample of responses:

• This one was tough. As a Catholic, the garden of Eden and the apple are not something that I trust. Catholics believe in Satan, and Satan tricked Eve into eating the apple. Eden was pure before Eve ate the apple_ but after Eden was no longer pure. I chose B because it is a very traditional logo. C is also very traditional but I I do not think that light blue is a good color for vitamins. I like the rainbow on C if it is meant to remind us of Noah and the ark but I fear that it is used instead as a symbol of gay pride. A does not look like a vitamin logo but rather a child's board game logo- it reminds me of Hi-Ho! Cherry-o (it looks like a cherry not an apple). You need to make some more logos and try again. If you want something pure maybe just the garden of Eden but not the apple from the garden of Eden that Eve ate and caused all of mankind to be doomed- requiring God to come down to Earth and sacrifice himself to provide us with the possibility of everlasting life. It is not common for vitamins to have a primary color scheme unless they are children's vitamins. I also think that all 3 of the logos are too complicated.
• It was difficult to choose because I do like all three logos for different reasons... I selected option C as my favorite because I like the scene with the rainbox and the apples on the tree. It's very lovely and memorable. Option B is visibly memorable. The sunbeams behind the tree really stand out as well as the red border and the established date of the company. Option A has its merits, too, as I like the look of the tree with the red lines of bark turning into apples. I also like the apple design on the edge and the way that Purest Eden is slightly ajar and wider than the rest of the logo. They're all solid logos and I would use products with any of them.

Which logo is more appealing?

This is a 4 option poll with 50 respondents. A sample of responses:

• Choice C is my top pick because I like the logo and colors in it. I like how part of the logo is green and the other part is orange. Then to compliment this you have the blue smiling face which has green and orange shapes on each side of it. Choice D was my next pick because I like how the blue and orange go together. Also, the lettering style on the BJM looks fun and has a nice look to it. Choice A was my last pick because I was not really a fan of the small child face. However, I liked this one more then Choice B because the color options for it look a lot better.
• I chose C first, because I think it hits a nice balance of being cute and calming, while still clear and easy to read. I chose A next, because I prefer the brown tones in the version with the cartoon baby, because I think it makes it stand out more. I chose D third, because I like the bubble font on the BJM.
• I like choice C the most. The logo is nice and flows well. I like the colors and the illustration. The logo looks very professional and well done. I think D is ok and like the colors, but not a big fan of the quality. I think A is ok, but I don't really like the illustration of the baby.
• It really depends on what the product is for but my choice is C and I would assume that it is a baby product and most likely by looking at logo option C something that might help soothing a baby day and night and if that is the case the C logo seems to be most appropriate

which logo is the most appealing and why?

This is a 3 option poll with 50 respondents targeting Amazon Prime Membership (Yes). A sample of responses:

• Option B is the best, it shows a box that when you open it FUN is inside, and that is what you want in a subscription service. The confetti is most effective in showing that. Option C is close behind but the shooting star is less effective showing the fun factor. Option A does not convey the "fun" but rather shows what you are getting is a more high end vibe. The font used is one I associate with luxury branding. If hi end products are to be the offerings this is the best choice. If they are more mundane common items that are to be offered this logo will make someone less enthused about the subscription.
• B is my favorite of the choices, because the image just fills the screen more, and looks more fun with the box opening and the streamers shooting out. It has a nice color scheme and catches my attention the most. / C is my second choice, because while the artwork is nice, it does not really fill up the screen and looks small compared the the white background that dominates the whole image. / A is the worst of the 3, as it just looks really simple, bland and boring. The artwork seems rough, and it is hard to read the text.
• I like my first choice the best because I think the design is very appealing as well as the font logo and they go well together (I do wish it was just a little bit bigger). I chose the second one because I like the design on this one as well as the star going across the box. The one I chose last was only because I didn't like the two boxes which seems unnecessary. I would've chosen that one first if it hadn't been for that because I really liked the colors and design.

Which logo do you like for a gender neutral skincare brand?

This is a 2 option poll with 50 respondents. A sample of responses:

• Option B seems less gendered than A. The more italicized script of August in A could be seen as more feminine. The simple but contrasted styles of option B don't really point to one gender. I like that simple style and that there is that slight, but noticeable, difference between the two words.
• Okay. Let's start with Option B: I think this logo is the best one for a gender neutral skincare brand because the names August and Monroe are having similar font styles and this logo makes me think it belongs to a reputable company. I don't find this feelings in Option A.
• I think this one because there's a balance between feminine and masculine... one is in script like writing and fancier, the other is bold and more traditional. it's like the best of both worlds, regardless of your gender.
• I like B, it seems to emphasize that it's for men and women both without being excessive about it. A seems almost like too masculine plus too feminine in the fonts, which doesn't really say gender neutral to me.
• I prefer the font choices in B. They are similar in size(and sincde there are two names I think one word shouldn't be smaller in size than the other.) B definitely caught my eye immediately.
• I like B better because the fonts go together better whereas on A, the August is way to small compared to the Monroe and I don't like the font used for that Monroe at all.

• 50 Respondents Female
  Which Logo do you prefer, for a new e-commerce Kitchenware and Homeware Brand, and please comment on which colour combination would suit that Logo.
• 50 Respondents General Population
  Which podcast logo do you prefer? Why? Thank you for your thoughtful feedback.
• 50 Respondents General Population
  Which gray colored shield icon do you prefer the most? Note: the gray icon is supposed to represent "Not Applicable".
• 50 Respondents $61-100k $101k+ Bachelor's Degree Graduate Degree Amazon Prime Member 35-44 45-54 55-64
  Which logo do you like more for a Vitamin Company? Which logo would make you trust company & buy its vitamins?
• 50 Respondents General Population
  Which design do you like?
• 50 Respondents Married Married Amazon Prime Member 25-34 35-44
  Which design do you like?
• 50 Respondents White Amazon Prime Member Nutritional Supplements - Daily Nutritional Supplements - Occasionally 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74
  Which logo do you like more for a Vitamin Company? Which logo would make you trust company & buy its products?
• 50 Respondents General Population
  Which logo is more appealing?
• 50 Respondents Amazon Prime Member
  which logo is the most appealing and why?
• 50 Respondents General Population
  Which logo do you like for a gender neutral skincare brand?