{"app_id":"fyv2a0qw"}

Ranked

Poll complete
50 people answered in 37 minutes.
50 US-based respondentsAmazon Prime subscribersMay 28, 2023Public
May 28, 2023Public

Q: Which design do you like the most and why?

Ranked poll

3rd place
A option image
A
11 votes
22%
2nd place
B option image
B
18 votes
40%
PickFu winner
C option image
C
21 votes
60%

AI Summary

The survey results show that Option C was the winning option with a score of 60, while Option B had a score of 40 and Option A had a score of 22. Respondents ranked every option in order of preference, and in Round 1, Option B was ranked as first choice 18 times, while Option C was ranked as first choice 21 times. However, after all rounds and relative score calculation, it was determined that Option C had the highest overall preference among respondents. The characteristics that made Option C stand out were its elegant design with a glittery gold border against a black background and visible font size. In contrast to Options A and B, which were seen as either too plain or too busy respectively.

The top three topics that were important across all options were design appeal/appearance (mentioned by over half of the respondents), ease of readability (mentioned by almost half), and consistency/uniformity (mentioned by just under half). Respondents appreciated designs that looked visually appealing without being too flashy or cluttered. They also preferred designs with easy-to-read fonts and clear borders around the text to make it stand out. Consistency in terms of card size for each table number card was also an important factor for many respondents.

Based on these poll results, hypotheses to further test could include: whether different color schemes would have changed respondents' preferences; whether adding more intricate designs or patterns would have increased appeal; whether having different font types for each table number card would have affected ease-of-readability scores; whether including images or icons on the cards would have made them more visually appealing; whether having different sizes for head tables versus regular tables would affect overall preference scores; finally testing how much people are willing to pay based on their preferences could give insight into consumer willingness to pay for premium-looking table number cards at events like weddings or banquets.

Ask PickFu

Ask natural language questions about your poll to our custom AI engine. Don’t worry, it’s friendly.

Log in as poll owner to use Ask PickFu.
Response flags
0
Keywords
14
13
13
11
Options
0
0
0
‌
‌
‌
‌
‌
‌
‌
‌
‌
‌
‌
‌
‌
‌
‌

Showing 50/50 respondents

OptionRound 1Round 2
C1st

42.00%

21 votes

60.00%

30 votes+9
B2nd

36.00%

18 votes

40.00%

20 votes+2
A3rd

22.00%

11 votes

Eliminated

11 votes reassigned

Subscribe to PickFu+ to unlock AI highlights on every poll.

Or, unlock AI features for this poll as a one-time $29 add-on.

AI analysis (sample data)

Unearth more insights with a detailed poll report, discovering what respondents liked, disliked, and what to do next.

Survey Analysis

Winning Option: Characteristics and Appeal

  • Option B emerged as the preferred brand packaging design, securing 12 out of 15 votes. Respondents frequently highlighted its aesthetic appeal, emphasizing the luxurious and high-quality impression it conveys. The ability to stack packages was a notable practical advantage mentioned by participants.
  • Several respondents appreciated the monochrome color scheme of Option B, which they found less overwhelming compared to more colorful designs. This preference for simplicity suggests that minimalistic designs may resonate well with this group.
  • Additionally, environmental considerations played a role in favoring Option B; some participants noted its reduced plastic usage and recyclability as attractive features.

Key Topics Across Options

  1. Aesthetic Appeal: Across both options, aesthetics were crucial in influencing preferences. Participants often referred to colors and overall design quality when justifying their choices.

  2. Environmental Concerns: Both options had respondents who valued environmentally friendly aspects of packaging. However, while Option A was praised for being reusable and eco-friendly by some, others perceived Option B’s reduced plastic use as more sustainable.

  3. Practicality: Practical elements such as ease of stacking (Option B) or suitability for travel (Option B) were significant factors in decision-making processes.

Hypotheses for Further Testing

  • Investigate whether minimalistic designs consistently outperform colorful ones across different demographic groups or product categories.

  • Explore if environmental messaging on packaging significantly influences consumer preference when compared with other attributes like luxury perception or practicality.

  • Assess how important stacking capability is relative to other functional benefits in various contexts such as home storage versus travel convenience.

These hypotheses can guide further research into understanding deeper consumer motivations behind packaging preferences observed in this survey context.

AI themes (sample data)

Learn what respondents like and dislike about your poll based on sentiments analyzed by our AI.
A

Likes (sample data)

  • Sleek and modern design
  • Large ear cup sizes for comfort
  • Minimalist and streamlined look

Dislikes (sample data)

  • Lack of unique features or standout elements
  • White color may get dirty easily
  • Not as much cushioning as other options
B

Likes (sample data)

  • (Note: There were no positive mentions specific to Option B in the provided survey answers)

Dislikes (sample data)

  • (Note: There were no negative mentions specific to Option B in the provided survey answers)
C

Likes (sample data)

  • Unique and stylish metallic grating design
  • Sturdy and flexible build
  • 'Cool' aesthetic appeal

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'Weird' or unpleasant cone shape for earmuffs
  • 'Odd' overall appearance with metallic accents
  • (Note: Third negative mention not available from provided survey answers)
D

Likes (sample data)

  • Comfortable and sturdy design
  • Aesthetic appeal, including color options
  • Familiarity with the brand's quality

Dislikes (sample data)

  • Negative perception of the brand logo
  • Smaller ear size perceived as less comfortable
  • Design not preferred compared to others
E

Likes (sample data)

  • Sleek, modern, and professional look
  • Comfortable fit with larger ear sections that cup the ears well
  • Minimalist and clean black aesthetic

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'Flat' appearance perceived as less comfortable by some
  • 'Bulky' design disliked by a few respondents
  • Narrower piece near headband' not appealing to all users
F

Likes (sample data)

  • 'Cushiony padding' for comfort over long periods of use
  • 'Solid build' making it durable and secure on the head/ears
  • Preferred neutral colors like black for headphones

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'Large ear covering' may be too big for some users’ preferences
  • 'Separation of controls/buttons' not liked by everyone
  • 'Chrome accent rings on headband' not appealing to all respondents
G

Likes (sample data)

  • Design perceived as high quality and appealing
  • Liked the color, especially the blue
  • Thin padding was appreciated

Dislikes (sample data)

  • Looked flimsy to some respondents
  • Perceived as less sturdy compared to other options
  • Color preference for white or black over blue
H

Likes (sample data)

  • Modern and high-quality appearance with a white design
  • Comfortable padding on headband and ears
  • Sleek and neutral look preferred by many

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'White' color seen as prone to getting dirty easily
  • 'Large ear cups' might be problematic for glasses wearers over long periods of use
  • 'Sturdy design' could be considered bulky by some users