{"app_id":"fyv2a0qw"}

Head-to-head

Poll complete
50 people answered in 19 minutes.
50 US-based respondentsDecember 4, 2018Public
December 4, 2018Public

Q: Which game title sounds more appealing as a game to play with friends?

Head-to-head poll

PickFu winner
Protectors of the Rainbow: an Advanced Hide-and-Go-Seek Scavenger Hunt Game
A
37 votes

74%
2nd place
The Rainbow Unicorn Game: an Advanced Hide-and-Go-Seek Scavenger Hunt Game
B
13 votes

26%

AI Summary

We’re still gathering data. Your AI summary will be automatically generated after your poll completes, please check back in a few minutes.

Ask PickFu

Ask natural language questions about your poll to our custom AI engine. Don’t worry, it’s friendly.

Log in as poll owner to use Ask PickFu.
Response flags
0
Gender identity
29
20
1
Age range
9
27
8
5
1
A
37 responses
A

Rainbow unicorn game sounds ridiclious

A

sounds more powerful, attracts the buyers more than the rainbow unicorn game

A

The name sounds cool and more intriguing.

A

I like role playing games, and title A has a sound as though it would involve epic battles of swords and sorcery

A

Choice A sounds more exciting than the other description

A

The mention of a unicorn in A is unappealing to me.

A

It just makes me wonder more than the other one does. It's more intriguing.

A

B is blah. So boring. Anyway, both are too long.

A

i think a sounds more appealing. it is worded better

A

The other title is a little too on the nose.

A

A rainbow unicorn doesn't really appeal to males

A

Is this a board game or electronic game? That kind of makes a difference for this answer. For an electronic game, I prefer A. For a board game, I prefer B.

A

The title was more appealing and had a sort of call to action for the game.

A

I think many people would not be willing to play the other title assuming it is a juvenile game.

A

I think this one makes it sound a little more exciting and sounds like it has more action.

A

I think "Protectors of the Rainbow" is better because it does not sound as juvenile as the other game. Using the phrase "Rainbow Unicorn" makes me think the product is for little girls.

A

This one sounds more exciting and more gender inclusive.

A

It sounds more exciting and suitable for all ages.

A

It seems more gender neutral, sounds more fitting, and is still imaginative.

A

Option A sounds like the more mature game title for a wide target audience. The problem with Option B is that having unicorns in the title makes it appear like it is a children's game, especially female children.

A

I like the description that doesn't use unicorn

A

Both sound too goofy for me personally. But were I going strictly off name, A is more appealing than B.

A

Option B seems like it's for a little girl. Option A I can see being for anyone, I'd be more likely to play it.

A

I think that "protecting" the rainbow would resonate with everyone. But I really liked the "Rainbow Unicorn" in second option. But I will choose option A because of wanting to protect the rainbow sounded more exciting to me.

A

Less kidsy title without Rainbow Unicorn

A

I picked option A because it sounds a little more adult than the other option. The other option sounds like something for kids.

A

this title sounds more collaborative, and gives more of a sense of what you do in the game. the action-oriented slant is more active than the other option.

A

Its more engaging and sounds like more of an adveture quest game

A

Protectors of sounds more interesting and cool

A

Makes it sound less childish

A

This sounds more adult to me.

A

I like the title protectors of the rainbow better than the other title. To me, a unicorn is something that doesn't sound that appealing to me. I'd rather just protect the rainbow.

A

Throwing in the word "unicorn" makes the game sound very juvenile.

A

Unicorns make it sound more like a kids game.

A

Protectors sounds more exciting and adventurous.

A

Protectors of the Rainbow sounds more unique and original than the other option.

A

Option A sounds more competitive, a bit more adult with the word "protector", like a superhero.

B
13 responses
B

Rainbow unicorn actually sounds like a really fun idea

B

It makes it more exciting with unicorns

B

I like this title better.

B

neither one, too long

B

This would only be appealing to girls and most would choose this one.

B

Seems to be directed to a younger audience and Unicorns are very trendy now.

B

I like unicorns . Sounds less aggressive more enjoyable.

B

Protectors of the rainbow makes me think it will be a battle type game (i.e. fortnite type) where you need to defend the rainbow against something. That doesn't appeal to me.

B

I love Rainbows and Unicorns together in anything. It sounds very exciting.

B

With the popularity of unicorn everything right now, I think using that word in the title will gather more interested parties.

B

I like that the description tells you that it's a game and then describes it.

B

Sounds a little more unique

B

Both titles are weird, but I like the sound of including the "unicorn" in the title.

Subscribe to PickFu+ to unlock AI highlights on every poll.

Or, unlock AI features for this poll as a one-time $29 add-on.

AI analysis (sample data)

Unearth more insights with a detailed poll report, discovering what respondents liked, disliked, and what to do next.

Survey Analysis

Winning Option: Characteristics and Appeal

  • Option B emerged as the preferred brand packaging design, securing 12 out of 15 votes. Respondents frequently highlighted its aesthetic appeal, emphasizing the luxurious and high-quality impression it conveys. The ability to stack packages was a notable practical advantage mentioned by participants.
  • Several respondents appreciated the monochrome color scheme of Option B, which they found less overwhelming compared to more colorful designs. This preference for simplicity suggests that minimalistic designs may resonate well with this group.
  • Additionally, environmental considerations played a role in favoring Option B; some participants noted its reduced plastic usage and recyclability as attractive features.

Key Topics Across Options

  1. Aesthetic Appeal: Across both options, aesthetics were crucial in influencing preferences. Participants often referred to colors and overall design quality when justifying their choices.

  2. Environmental Concerns: Both options had respondents who valued environmentally friendly aspects of packaging. However, while Option A was praised for being reusable and eco-friendly by some, others perceived Option B’s reduced plastic use as more sustainable.

  3. Practicality: Practical elements such as ease of stacking (Option B) or suitability for travel (Option B) were significant factors in decision-making processes.

Hypotheses for Further Testing

  • Investigate whether minimalistic designs consistently outperform colorful ones across different demographic groups or product categories.

  • Explore if environmental messaging on packaging significantly influences consumer preference when compared with other attributes like luxury perception or practicality.

  • Assess how important stacking capability is relative to other functional benefits in various contexts such as home storage versus travel convenience.

These hypotheses can guide further research into understanding deeper consumer motivations behind packaging preferences observed in this survey context.

AI themes (sample data)

Learn what respondents like and dislike about your poll based on sentiments analyzed by our AI.
A

Likes (sample data)

  • Sleek and modern design
  • Large ear cup sizes for comfort
  • Minimalist and streamlined look

Dislikes (sample data)

  • Lack of unique features or standout elements
  • White color may get dirty easily
  • Not as much cushioning as other options
B

Likes (sample data)

  • (Note: There were no positive mentions specific to Option B in the provided survey answers)

Dislikes (sample data)

  • (Note: There were no negative mentions specific to Option B in the provided survey answers)
C

Likes (sample data)

  • Unique and stylish metallic grating design
  • Sturdy and flexible build
  • 'Cool' aesthetic appeal

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'Weird' or unpleasant cone shape for earmuffs
  • 'Odd' overall appearance with metallic accents
  • (Note: Third negative mention not available from provided survey answers)
D

Likes (sample data)

  • Comfortable and sturdy design
  • Aesthetic appeal, including color options
  • Familiarity with the brand's quality

Dislikes (sample data)

  • Negative perception of the brand logo
  • Smaller ear size perceived as less comfortable
  • Design not preferred compared to others
E

Likes (sample data)

  • Sleek, modern, and professional look
  • Comfortable fit with larger ear sections that cup the ears well
  • Minimalist and clean black aesthetic

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'Flat' appearance perceived as less comfortable by some
  • 'Bulky' design disliked by a few respondents
  • Narrower piece near headband' not appealing to all users
F

Likes (sample data)

  • 'Cushiony padding' for comfort over long periods of use
  • 'Solid build' making it durable and secure on the head/ears
  • Preferred neutral colors like black for headphones

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'Large ear covering' may be too big for some users’ preferences
  • 'Separation of controls/buttons' not liked by everyone
  • 'Chrome accent rings on headband' not appealing to all respondents
G

Likes (sample data)

  • Design perceived as high quality and appealing
  • Liked the color, especially the blue
  • Thin padding was appreciated

Dislikes (sample data)

  • Looked flimsy to some respondents
  • Perceived as less sturdy compared to other options
  • Color preference for white or black over blue
H

Likes (sample data)

  • Modern and high-quality appearance with a white design
  • Comfortable padding on headband and ears
  • Sleek and neutral look preferred by many

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'White' color seen as prone to getting dirty easily
  • 'Large ear cups' might be problematic for glasses wearers over long periods of use
  • 'Sturdy design' could be considered bulky by some users