{"app_id":"fyv2a0qw"}

Head-to-head

Poll complete
50 people answered in about 5 hours.
50 US-based respondentsWomenFebruary 13, 2020Public
February 13, 2020Public

Q: Based on the image, which product would you buy?

Head-to-head poll

Statistically significant
PickFu winner
A option image
A
34 votes

68%
2nd place
B option image
B
16 votes

32%

AI Summary

We’re still gathering data. Your AI summary will be automatically generated after your poll completes, please check back in a few minutes.

Ask PickFu

Ask natural language questions about your poll to our custom AI engine. Don’t worry, it’s friendly.

Log in as poll owner to use Ask PickFu.
Response flags
0
Keywords
12
11
10
9


Gender identity
50
Age range
11
9
18
7
5
A
34 responses
A

I like option A because the product looks sturdy.

A

This product looks more sturdy.

A

first one is very good image

A

I like the seat cover on B, but I feel like the three legs on A are sturdier and the saddle in the front is narrower and easier to sit on.

A

Option B looks like a weird transformer and doesn't look sturdy.

A

It's unclear to me how B even fits on the toilet. A illustrates this aspect better.

A

A-- has a simpler design, would be easier to clean, the fact that part of it sits inside the toilet is good as far as eliminating splashes all over the back part of the toilet seat. also would be less likely for the child to slip off while on the toilet seat.

A

It looks more stable and sturdy to use

A

I chose B Because it has a bowl so that the potty can be used without having to be on the toilet, A does not.

A

It shows exactly how it sits on the toilet and seems more stable

A

I would choose A because it looks more sturdy and has its own reservoir.

A

It looks like it is made so much better than the other option and its functionality seems practical. The other option I can't even figure out how that would fit or how it would even work.

A

Choice A could be used as a floor model or on a commode as an adapter for small children. The round shape would be more comfortable. This looks easier to clean than choice B as all the surfaces are easily cleaned and can be taken apart. Choice B The side arms look uncomfortable to have on tub. There are too many places to clean from the grill on the front to the designs on the arms.

A

It has an old school look, but it's a thing I would trust. It looks far more sturdy. If you are using these things for these certain things, sturdiness matters. Also easier to clean.

A

Option A looks more practical and realistic. I like how the display photos shows exactly how this product would be used and that makes it look more beneficial. This is a product that looks safe due to the pieces on the bottom of it, it looks more secure and like it would be the best choice for my needs. Option B does not look as realistic to use on a practical basis

A

A looks more secure, and I would choose it because I wouldn't want my kid to fall and be traumatized.

A

I like to select

A

I picked A because I can actually see how it works in the pictures, the other one is too confusing.

A

Option A seems more stable and gives me more of an idea of how to use it.

A

A seems to be more secure and reliable. B looks less easy to use.

A

Option A seems much more practical. B seems to require a liner over it to use- in a public restroom this would just be too much hassle. Option A seems to fold down into a more compact parcel it does the job of making a public toilet seat safe to use by actually putting a gap between it and the product. Also A appears much easier to clean.

A

I chose A because it shows how the product is used.

A

This looks like it is a child's toilet helper, the other one is clearly going to collapse upon first use if its in the middle/main picture selection. That is going to go badly. It also looks like it doesn't quite fit all the way, I like that the other picture shows the product in use.

A

Choice A looks sturdier. Choice B looks more likely to break. The photo of Choice B wrapped in plastic is offputting.

A

Choice A is presented better with photos of it in all settings

A

It shows you the inside of the object

A

I would buy option A because I can see that it is a portable training potty. I like the design of option B better because it looks more futuristic and robotic like with the round wheel looking things. But, it might have scared my toddlers when they were potty training. Option A isn't as scary looking, I think. The bottom right corner photo made me realize what I was looking at and then I made my decision.

A

This option shows how to use the product if one is unfamiliar with it. While I like the design and color of option B better, I would first click on option A because it shows the product in use.

A

I would always rather see it on the actual toilet so you can see how to use it and know what you're getting. I like some of the photos from the other set, yet I chose this one for the one single photo on the toilet. It really helps me see what I can expect.ot makes it look easy to use also.

A

I like the multi-stage use of A. The plastic bag part of B does not appeal to me. The traditional bowl of A is more typical. B looks like it could almost be unstable.

A

A looks so much sturdier. The other choice looks lightweight, but like it would collapse at any minute.

A

I picked A because it included a picture that showed what it is. I could not tell by looking at B ws the device was.

A

This one looks more sturdy on the square legs and looks like it fits better on the seat. The other one looks like it's on wheels and would not be as sturdy.

A

I think that I would buy this one because it gives me a better idea for how the product would be used over the toilet seat and how it would fit. I think that the other one has a unique design, but the leg stands don't really seem as sturdy or as practical to me as A does. So based on just the overall design and product images, I feel like A's photos are more informing so I'd go with that.

B
16 responses
B

I am not sure if this is a better product but the shape looks interesting. I had to do a double take to see what it was.

B

I'm not entirely sure what the object is, but choice B just looked more appealing. I'm going to assume it's some sort of assistance for the toilet? Odd design, or perhaps I'm just not used to seeing this product.

B

I like the color of Option B more than Option A. In addition to this, I like the fact that it shows that there's a disposal bag that can be used with this option as well.

B

I like B because it looks like it has a better grip than A.

B

I like b since it looks more durable this would be an item that i would have to check out in person and try it, for toilet trainging theough I would saythat b looks strudy and less scary for a kid, the oother a looks kinda flismsy but would really have to check it out

B

I vote for B because I prefer that design and it looks more comfortable. There is no front flap as in A and that looks like it would be uncomfortable.

B

I have no idea what that is, but the overall design of B was more modern and current.

B

There's more of the design features shown and it looks more comfortable

B

At first glance, I prefer B because all of the waste will fall into the toilet and there is no gross plastic basin to clean. Then I studied the pictures longer and realised that choice A is more versatile because it can be a small seat on a toilet OR a potty that has nothing to do with an adult toilet. But choice B is the much better 'small seat on a toilet.' It's obvious that A is adapted from a potty chair.

B

I had a product which was similar to this for my children. B definitely seems like a better product as it seems more lightweight and compact and also seems like it would hold a bit better. In some configurations, it kind of looks like a race car, which I think would be appealing for children. Option A looks both clunky and heavy as well as not very sturdy. The more contrasting colors on Option B are more appealing as well.

B

I choose B because it looks higher quality and more sturdy to me. I didn’t like the look of the square pads on product A.

B

I think the seat on B looks more comfortable and I would want it to be comfortable when I use it. However, I do like that A is more compact because B looks kind of bulky when it is folded up.

B

The rounded edges on the "legs" make the seat more fun. It's somewhat like a car which would please young boys especially.

B

B had a more distinct look

B

This one looks cool and modern. I like it. Thank you

B

I like that there are cushioned parts and that the seat can be covered. It also looks like a little vehicle when it is standing on its flaps, which is cute.

Subscribe to PickFu+ to unlock AI highlights on every poll.

Or, unlock AI features for this poll as a one-time $29 add-on.

AI analysis (sample data)

Unearth more insights with a detailed poll report, discovering what respondents liked, disliked, and what to do next.

Survey Analysis

Winning Option: Characteristics and Appeal

  • Option B emerged as the preferred brand packaging design, securing 12 out of 15 votes. Respondents frequently highlighted its aesthetic appeal, emphasizing the luxurious and high-quality impression it conveys. The ability to stack packages was a notable practical advantage mentioned by participants.
  • Several respondents appreciated the monochrome color scheme of Option B, which they found less overwhelming compared to more colorful designs. This preference for simplicity suggests that minimalistic designs may resonate well with this group.
  • Additionally, environmental considerations played a role in favoring Option B; some participants noted its reduced plastic usage and recyclability as attractive features.

Key Topics Across Options

  1. Aesthetic Appeal: Across both options, aesthetics were crucial in influencing preferences. Participants often referred to colors and overall design quality when justifying their choices.

  2. Environmental Concerns: Both options had respondents who valued environmentally friendly aspects of packaging. However, while Option A was praised for being reusable and eco-friendly by some, others perceived Option B’s reduced plastic use as more sustainable.

  3. Practicality: Practical elements such as ease of stacking (Option B) or suitability for travel (Option B) were significant factors in decision-making processes.

Hypotheses for Further Testing

  • Investigate whether minimalistic designs consistently outperform colorful ones across different demographic groups or product categories.

  • Explore if environmental messaging on packaging significantly influences consumer preference when compared with other attributes like luxury perception or practicality.

  • Assess how important stacking capability is relative to other functional benefits in various contexts such as home storage versus travel convenience.

These hypotheses can guide further research into understanding deeper consumer motivations behind packaging preferences observed in this survey context.

AI themes (sample data)

Learn what respondents like and dislike about your poll based on sentiments analyzed by our AI.
A

Likes (sample data)

  • Sleek and modern design
  • Large ear cup sizes for comfort
  • Minimalist and streamlined look

Dislikes (sample data)

  • Lack of unique features or standout elements
  • White color may get dirty easily
  • Not as much cushioning as other options
B

Likes (sample data)

  • (Note: There were no positive mentions specific to Option B in the provided survey answers)

Dislikes (sample data)

  • (Note: There were no negative mentions specific to Option B in the provided survey answers)
C

Likes (sample data)

  • Unique and stylish metallic grating design
  • Sturdy and flexible build
  • 'Cool' aesthetic appeal

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'Weird' or unpleasant cone shape for earmuffs
  • 'Odd' overall appearance with metallic accents
  • (Note: Third negative mention not available from provided survey answers)
D

Likes (sample data)

  • Comfortable and sturdy design
  • Aesthetic appeal, including color options
  • Familiarity with the brand's quality

Dislikes (sample data)

  • Negative perception of the brand logo
  • Smaller ear size perceived as less comfortable
  • Design not preferred compared to others
E

Likes (sample data)

  • Sleek, modern, and professional look
  • Comfortable fit with larger ear sections that cup the ears well
  • Minimalist and clean black aesthetic

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'Flat' appearance perceived as less comfortable by some
  • 'Bulky' design disliked by a few respondents
  • Narrower piece near headband' not appealing to all users
F

Likes (sample data)

  • 'Cushiony padding' for comfort over long periods of use
  • 'Solid build' making it durable and secure on the head/ears
  • Preferred neutral colors like black for headphones

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'Large ear covering' may be too big for some users’ preferences
  • 'Separation of controls/buttons' not liked by everyone
  • 'Chrome accent rings on headband' not appealing to all respondents
G

Likes (sample data)

  • Design perceived as high quality and appealing
  • Liked the color, especially the blue
  • Thin padding was appreciated

Dislikes (sample data)

  • Looked flimsy to some respondents
  • Perceived as less sturdy compared to other options
  • Color preference for white or black over blue
H

Likes (sample data)

  • Modern and high-quality appearance with a white design
  • Comfortable padding on headband and ears
  • Sleek and neutral look preferred by many

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'White' color seen as prone to getting dirty easily
  • 'Large ear cups' might be problematic for glasses wearers over long periods of use
  • 'Sturdy design' could be considered bulky by some users