{"app_id":"fyv2a0qw"}

Head-to-head

Poll complete
50 people answered in 16 minutes.
50 US-based respondentsJanuary 14, 2022Public
January 14, 2022Public

Q: Which heading is most effective and appealing in describing what's included in the box for this Dog Trimmer product?

Head-to-head poll

Statistically significant
PickFu winner
A option image
A
38 votes

76%
2nd place
B option image
B
12 votes

24%

AI Summary

We’re still gathering data. Your AI summary will be automatically generated after your poll completes, please check back in a few minutes.

Ask PickFu

Ask natural language questions about your poll to our custom AI engine. Don’t worry, it’s friendly.

Log in as poll owner to use Ask PickFu.
Response flags
0
Keywords
17
11
8
7


Gender identity
14
33
3
Racial or ethnic identity
3
5
5
33
4
Education level
3
7
4
23
13
Amazon Prime member
37
13
Dog owner
23
Age range
2
7
26
8
1
6
A
38 responses
A

Choice A is more concise and straight forward as a headline

A

I like how it looks and whats in it

A

A is less cluttered.

A

A is better i think because the phrase used for the headline in B is kind of superfluous

A

All in one dog grooming kit is something that people would want for a first time buyer

A

I like A as it gets right to the point letting me know this is an all in one device.

A

This heading implies that I do not need any other tools or accessories because it includes everything. The other one does not - I would have to spend time trying to figure out if anything is not included.

A

I think go with the larger heading. I can see from the photo and list of items what is included. Don't need to have that in the text.

A

This option felt more convenient to use since it emphasized an all in one set.

A

This is the most informational graphic.

A

This version tells you just as much about the product while doing it in less words.

A

All in one makes it seem like it has everything you could ever want.

A

The heading in B is completely redundant. You don't need to tell them "What's Included." It is implied from the list of things the package includes.

A

Lets text - especially there is so much other text - seems better in this instance.

A

I chose A because the "All in One" is a more encompassing description of the item and the purchase. "What's Included" seems like it should be more of an added bit of information. Also, the viewer can see what's included in the photo. That means in the viewer's mind, those things comprise the "all in one."

A

This messaging is clear and effective.

A

I like using the "All in One" language, it makes clear that everything I need is included without using too many words.

A

makes it clear that it is all in one and can do many things

A

I strongly prefer the option A product heading because the font is much larger and easier to read, and I like how fewer words are used, which makes it much quicker to read than the option B heading.

A

More direct and to the point.

A

I think the heading of A is far less wordy, and a lot easier to process, and more what I'd expect the heading to be

A

A has a better heading because Option B seems an incomplete heading.

A

I like the thought of the all-in-one, so Option A appeals to me more.

A

I really love the phrase "all-in-one"; for me those sort of words on products evoke a sense of "everything you need to do this thing is in here"

A

A just feels too cluttered.

A

Option A clearly states it is all in one and it does not disappoint. I can see that it contains virtually everything I would need to groom my dog so I don't have to question whether the heading is boastful or not. It actually has everything so I think the more humble, option B, poster is less appealing.

A

I think option A is better because I don't think "what's included" is necessary.

A

I think this makes a little more sense, you don't need to expand on the "what's included" part, its kind of implied.

A

'All in One' is my favorite choice because it says it all. I prefer "A".

A

I like the approach of All in One. Using What's Included as a headline is very lazy.

A

What's included is unnecessary in the heading because All-in-one implies that we are about to look at the features that can be found within this one product.

A

The larger font size is appealing and makes for an effective heading that I can easily understand at a glance.

A

Definitely all in one. It tells me that this product will do everything. What's included tell me to look at the list and see if I agree with what is listed. That leads to uncertainty, and I wouldn't want to buy a product where I would be uncertain. Definitely Option A.

A

The "All in One" text at the top of this option is very telling of the product being a kit. I don't think it is necessary to have the text "What's included" at the top because the image shows all parts of the kit and provides details in-text at the bottom left-hand corner.

A

I much prefer this one and its wording is much nicer than the other.

A

I like the pronouncement that this is "all in one." I feel like this is all I need.

A

All-in-one is a much more powerful headline and that's where people see 1st. All-in-one at the top makes me believe I'm about to get an incredible deal.

A

The heading and subheading of this picture appear a bit less cramped and crowded in this image, which makes the whole thing feel a bit cleaner. Especially since the rest of the image already has a lot to look at on it.

B
12 responses
B

I have a better understanding of what the image is about with B compared to A.

B

"B" comes right out and says what's included. it's the first thing i saw.

B

I prefer that I know I am getting all that is pictured.

B

Option B sounds more clearer and advertises the product that what comes with it than Option A

B

The way the word 'included' ends up above the included items looks better than how it is in A.

B

"What's Included" sounds like I'll be getting more

B

I like that option B makes it very clear that all the items pictured come with the shaver set. Option A is a bit awkwardly worded in my opinion.

B

This tagline draws my attention to it. It tellsme the whole point of the ad.

B

I like B as it has more information in the heading, which is where you would be reading and that added content flows well with the rest of the image.

B

I think the what's included tittle is most straight forward because I know the image and information is going to be all about what I am going to get with this product. Option A is not as clear about this

B

I think that option B is because it says what's included right at the top and that's helpful.

B

Clearly states what's included. The directness of the statement is more appealing to me, it's clear.

Subscribe to PickFu+ to unlock AI highlights on every poll.

Or, unlock AI features for this poll as a one-time $29 add-on.

AI analysis (sample data)

Unearth more insights with a detailed poll report, discovering what respondents liked, disliked, and what to do next.

Survey Analysis

Winning Option: Characteristics and Appeal

  • Option B emerged as the preferred brand packaging design, securing 12 out of 15 votes. Respondents frequently highlighted its aesthetic appeal, emphasizing the luxurious and high-quality impression it conveys. The ability to stack packages was a notable practical advantage mentioned by participants.
  • Several respondents appreciated the monochrome color scheme of Option B, which they found less overwhelming compared to more colorful designs. This preference for simplicity suggests that minimalistic designs may resonate well with this group.
  • Additionally, environmental considerations played a role in favoring Option B; some participants noted its reduced plastic usage and recyclability as attractive features.

Key Topics Across Options

  1. Aesthetic Appeal: Across both options, aesthetics were crucial in influencing preferences. Participants often referred to colors and overall design quality when justifying their choices.

  2. Environmental Concerns: Both options had respondents who valued environmentally friendly aspects of packaging. However, while Option A was praised for being reusable and eco-friendly by some, others perceived Option B’s reduced plastic use as more sustainable.

  3. Practicality: Practical elements such as ease of stacking (Option B) or suitability for travel (Option B) were significant factors in decision-making processes.

Hypotheses for Further Testing

  • Investigate whether minimalistic designs consistently outperform colorful ones across different demographic groups or product categories.

  • Explore if environmental messaging on packaging significantly influences consumer preference when compared with other attributes like luxury perception or practicality.

  • Assess how important stacking capability is relative to other functional benefits in various contexts such as home storage versus travel convenience.

These hypotheses can guide further research into understanding deeper consumer motivations behind packaging preferences observed in this survey context.

AI themes (sample data)

Learn what respondents like and dislike about your poll based on sentiments analyzed by our AI.
A

Likes (sample data)

  • Sleek and modern design
  • Large ear cup sizes for comfort
  • Minimalist and streamlined look

Dislikes (sample data)

  • Lack of unique features or standout elements
  • White color may get dirty easily
  • Not as much cushioning as other options
B

Likes (sample data)

  • (Note: There were no positive mentions specific to Option B in the provided survey answers)

Dislikes (sample data)

  • (Note: There were no negative mentions specific to Option B in the provided survey answers)
C

Likes (sample data)

  • Unique and stylish metallic grating design
  • Sturdy and flexible build
  • 'Cool' aesthetic appeal

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'Weird' or unpleasant cone shape for earmuffs
  • 'Odd' overall appearance with metallic accents
  • (Note: Third negative mention not available from provided survey answers)
D

Likes (sample data)

  • Comfortable and sturdy design
  • Aesthetic appeal, including color options
  • Familiarity with the brand's quality

Dislikes (sample data)

  • Negative perception of the brand logo
  • Smaller ear size perceived as less comfortable
  • Design not preferred compared to others
E

Likes (sample data)

  • Sleek, modern, and professional look
  • Comfortable fit with larger ear sections that cup the ears well
  • Minimalist and clean black aesthetic

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'Flat' appearance perceived as less comfortable by some
  • 'Bulky' design disliked by a few respondents
  • Narrower piece near headband' not appealing to all users
F

Likes (sample data)

  • 'Cushiony padding' for comfort over long periods of use
  • 'Solid build' making it durable and secure on the head/ears
  • Preferred neutral colors like black for headphones

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'Large ear covering' may be too big for some users’ preferences
  • 'Separation of controls/buttons' not liked by everyone
  • 'Chrome accent rings on headband' not appealing to all respondents
G

Likes (sample data)

  • Design perceived as high quality and appealing
  • Liked the color, especially the blue
  • Thin padding was appreciated

Dislikes (sample data)

  • Looked flimsy to some respondents
  • Perceived as less sturdy compared to other options
  • Color preference for white or black over blue
H

Likes (sample data)

  • Modern and high-quality appearance with a white design
  • Comfortable padding on headband and ears
  • Sleek and neutral look preferred by many

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'White' color seen as prone to getting dirty easily
  • 'Large ear cups' might be problematic for glasses wearers over long periods of use
  • 'Sturdy design' could be considered bulky by some users