{"app_id":"fyv2a0qw"}Ranked poll
AI Summary
Ask PickFu
Ask natural language questions about your poll to our custom AI engine. Don’t worry, it’s friendly.
$31.99 is an attractive price point for these 2 baskets, albeit kind of expensive
I think the close up diagram of the basket will probably be more concise (especially since there's specific numbers involved).
I could make due with 2 large baskets instead of 3. I also prefer the cheaper options.
The level of detail shown is crisp and appropriate for displaying the product in a proper light.
For something like this, I would always want to save a few dollars, so I'd choose the one that looked like I was getting a little bit more for a little bit less, so I'd pick the 31.99 one, first A because it looks like you're getting more because of how they're stacked on top of each other. I like it more than B because it's closer up to me and looks bigger due to that. I like B because it shows how they can be stacked or used alone. Lastly, C is ok, but because it's 34 I would only buy it if I hadn't seen the other listings, if they weren't available.
A and B are pretty close to each other in terms of preferring. I wouldn't want C.
I like option A and the 2 square baskets for $31.99. They seem to be a more standard size and Ilike the price.
A and B seem more practical for size. C seems like overkill being taller. I think it would be hard to find enough room for the baskets in C.
A is by far my favorite choice. The product image, as well as the text are large and easy to read. C and B are both acceptable, but a little too small and they both look like sketches rather than the actual product
I ranked the design for these office racks that I would most likely buy from most to leat.
You always want to show a product what it really looks like. So people dont write bad reviews because they think they got a bad deal. So if the product is shorter in the inside it should be shown that way. A close up is better of his they go together.
3 baskets feels like you are getting more value (even if it takes up the same amount of space)
The option B is more versatile as it is thinner and fits more places. Option C is better than A because it comes with more.
B because the three wider but low baskets works for me and the price is good. I need three baskets to keep my items separated when I'm working so this is perfect. B is okay, but I couldn't separate as well with two baskets and C is too small for storage and too tall if set up for my purposes.
Option b feels like it would bring me the most value with the price and the three baskets for the dimensions that they are. I would have a clear use for this (craft storage and closet storage) as well. Option a only has two baskets compared to option c, but I think option a has a better size dimension. I think a bigger basket has more appeal since there are less limitations on what can fit into it. I liked option c the least because of the smaller size despite there being three baskets. I think it is more efficient to get the smaller amount of larger baskets in this case.
I prefer the option that is wider and shorter because I think that it would be more versatile. Some of the narrower options I think would be less functional.
I like the smaller size because I think it would be a bit more functional.
Options B and C are most attractive because of the depth and size making them more versatile for holding items and stacking.
I prefer the flatter baskets because I feel like they would fit better in my cabinets. I think the taller ones would not fit well.
i like the choice b best because they look smaller and more compact like they wouldnt take up your entire desk
The low baskets are more useful than the square ones I think and the more expensive option is just not worth it.
I think that the most attractive price option is the deeper baskets that are also the most expensive. You receive the most storage with these baskets, but you also receive the most total baskets. The other prices are only a few dollars less, so the bang for your buck is clearly represented by Option C.
I like the larger baskets. You can store more stuff in them. The design is very nice and the color would blend in very well.They stack well and don't take up much space. It looks like handles on the top of the basket to make it easy to carry or move around
This is attractive because for a few dollars more you get an additional basket. I prefer option A over option B because even though you only get two baskets, they are taller and seem as though they could be more versatile.
For a couple of dollars more I get 3 baskets which are narrower and I could really use. This is my choice.
C feels like the best deal, like I'm getting the most for my money and more flexibility with the higher baskets.B is the same, but not as tall so that's why it's number two.A I'm only getting two.
Showing 50/50 respondents
| Option | Round 1 | Round 2 |
|---|---|---|
A1st | 36.00% 18 votes | 54.00% 27 votes+9 |
C2nd | 34.00% 17 votes | 46.00% 23 votes+6 |
B3rd | 30.00% 15 votes | Eliminated 15 votes reassigned |
Subscribe to PickFu+ to unlock AI highlights on every poll.
Or, unlock AI features for this poll as a one-time $29 add-on.
AI analysis (sample data)
Unearth more insights with a detailed poll report, discovering what respondents liked, disliked, and what to do next.Aesthetic Appeal: Across both options, aesthetics were crucial in influencing preferences. Participants often referred to colors and overall design quality when justifying their choices.
Environmental Concerns: Both options had respondents who valued environmentally friendly aspects of packaging. However, while Option A was praised for being reusable and eco-friendly by some, others perceived Option B’s reduced plastic use as more sustainable.
Practicality: Practical elements such as ease of stacking (Option B) or suitability for travel (Option B) were significant factors in decision-making processes.
Investigate whether minimalistic designs consistently outperform colorful ones across different demographic groups or product categories.
Explore if environmental messaging on packaging significantly influences consumer preference when compared with other attributes like luxury perception or practicality.
Assess how important stacking capability is relative to other functional benefits in various contexts such as home storage versus travel convenience.
These hypotheses can guide further research into understanding deeper consumer motivations behind packaging preferences observed in this survey context.
AI themes (sample data)
Learn what respondents like and dislike about your poll based on sentiments analyzed by our AI.Likes (sample data)
Dislikes (sample data)
Likes (sample data)
Dislikes (sample data)
Likes (sample data)
Dislikes (sample data)
Likes (sample data)
Dislikes (sample data)
Likes (sample data)
Dislikes (sample data)
Likes (sample data)
Dislikes (sample data)
Likes (sample data)
Dislikes (sample data)
Likes (sample data)
Dislikes (sample data)
Which product-price option is most attractive? | PickFu