{"app_id":"fyv2a0qw"}
Head-to-head poll
AI Summary
Ask PickFu
Ask natural language questions about your poll to our custom AI engine. Don’t worry, it’s friendly.
Option B is just terrible. It doesn't convey anything to the reader. How are we supposed to know what the author knew at the age of 12?
I like the fact it doesn't reference a kid's age... makes it more appealing to adults.
I prefer the slightly shorter tagline of Option A, it sounds better to me and doesn't give away too much about the content of the book.
Seems like a more serious title compared to the other one. Simpler and more direct as well.
Who wouldn't love the thought of being free; and the beauty of Maui, just makes everyone smile.
I knew nothing when I was twelve. That statement would not make me want to pick up the book.
I don't really understand the relevance of the second line about being 12 in Option B.
I think the mentioning of being 12 is a bit pretentious in the other title. I like the wording of option A better.
Choice A is more concise and to the point. I am attracted to less wordy taglines.
The art of being free applies to Maui more to me than what I knew when I was 12.
Option B feels too sarcastic with the "what I already knew when I was 12" part. I like the idea of the "art of being free" because it's more sophisticated sounding.
I didn't love either option, but A was significantly better than B. The reference to 12 year olds was strange and could be interpreted in many different ways.
A is good but the addition of what I already knew when i was 12 makes it a bit more intriguing.
The part about what they already knew when they were 12 sounds much more interesting.
Subscribe to PickFu+ to unlock AI highlights on every poll.
Or, unlock AI features for this poll as a one-time $29 add-on.
AI analysis (sample data)
Unearth more insights with a detailed poll report, discovering what respondents liked, disliked, and what to do next.Aesthetic Appeal: Across both options, aesthetics were crucial in influencing preferences. Participants often referred to colors and overall design quality when justifying their choices.
Environmental Concerns: Both options had respondents who valued environmentally friendly aspects of packaging. However, while Option A was praised for being reusable and eco-friendly by some, others perceived Option B’s reduced plastic use as more sustainable.
Practicality: Practical elements such as ease of stacking (Option B) or suitability for travel (Option B) were significant factors in decision-making processes.
Investigate whether minimalistic designs consistently outperform colorful ones across different demographic groups or product categories.
Explore if environmental messaging on packaging significantly influences consumer preference when compared with other attributes like luxury perception or practicality.
Assess how important stacking capability is relative to other functional benefits in various contexts such as home storage versus travel convenience.
These hypotheses can guide further research into understanding deeper consumer motivations behind packaging preferences observed in this survey context.
AI themes (sample data)
Learn what respondents like and dislike about your poll based on sentiments analyzed by our AI.Likes (sample data)
Dislikes (sample data)
Likes (sample data)
Dislikes (sample data)
Likes (sample data)
Dislikes (sample data)
Likes (sample data)
Dislikes (sample data)
Likes (sample data)
Dislikes (sample data)
Likes (sample data)
Dislikes (sample data)
Likes (sample data)
Dislikes (sample data)
Likes (sample data)
Dislikes (sample data)