Relationship status audience targeting

This is a 0 option poll with 100 respondents targeting Age range (35 44, 25 34) and Relationship status (Married, Domestic Partnership / Civil Union, Cohabitating With Significant Other). A sample of responses:

• I don't hate it necessarily, but I don't like it. So much attention is given to the bonuses, it really detracts from what I assume is the main product - the Bunny Blanket. There doesn't seem much special about it, or if there is, it wasn't told to us. It's waterproof & stainproof, that's nice, but so are many other blankets. Why is this specifically good for sex? Wasn't addressed. And some of the bonuses seem fun, but if you need FOUR bonuses to sell a product, that might tell you something right there.
• If the product's quality was high and the price was fair I would totally buy the product. You cannot put a price on increasing the value of a marriage.
• I would consider buying the blanket. I am not sure to what degree the other items would play a role in my decision. If the game truly was a free add-on rather than something that pushes up the price of the bundle that might incentivize me to buy the blanket more. I would want to know more, however, about what makes the blanket special and different from any other washable blanket.
• I like this because it makes having sex more fun and less work knowing you have to change and wash sheets. It also helps if you can’t change sheets right away and you have kids who will walk into your room and stains may be noticeable.
• Yes I would but this product this is something we would use and it’s very worth the price. I wouldn’t change a single thing about it.

This is a 0 option poll with 75 respondents targeting Relationship status (Cohabitating With Significant Other, Married, Domestic Partnership / Civil Union) and Age range (35 44, 25 34). A sample of responses:

• C feels bold and premium, B is clean, D cozy, A plain, and E lacks impact.
• I chose E as my first choice because when I see that box in the shop, I want it to be elegant and appealing since it relates to sex. It looks beautiful outside and inside, and the written instruction or message in the box is put in evidence, so the customer can not miss it. The flower is not all over the box, so it does not appear overwhelming to me compared to D. A is my second choice because it is discreet. With children at home, it is the best option. They would not be too attracted to the packaging and want to know precisely what is inside. However, for me, it is simple; usually, the way the box’s interior looks does not matter that much. I am not going to let the box open and admire the inside. It would be closed; I would admire the exterior, and it would look nice in my room. B is my third choice because the exterior is beautiful, but the interior is not very appealing. I will easily skip reading what is written inside because it does not grab my attention when I open the box. C makes me feel like the manufacturer only cares about the packaging, not the product inside the box. D is too much. The flower is all over; it does not look elegant to me.
• I like that the design covers the whole box. There is also places on the side and inside of the box where a description or saying can be placed.
• I chose “E” as the first option due to the nice text bubble inside of the box. I believe this will catch someone’s attention and have them reading it nice and clear. Option “C” was chosen because the blue helps people see the test easier. Nothing distracting from the eyes. Option “B” was chose because it’s similar to option “C”. Option “D” is chosen because I liked the designs on the box. I just feel like “E” is the best choice due to the text bubble highlighting words. “A” was nice, but least likely as my choice due to design.
• I like the floral print, but it needs the blue to help break it up

This is a 0 option poll with 50 respondents targeting Favorite book genres (Self Help And Relationships), Age range (25 34, 35 44), Gender identity (Male), and Relationship status (Single, Never Married, Separated / Divorced). A sample of responses:

• I chose (c)this one first because I am a fan of meeting in person (b) Sounds perfect for me (A) seem like it was focused on sex
• I belive that meeting woman in person and not using a program or the such is more influential towards a deeper romantic and intamint bond or relation versus using any web based program or social apps widely used today
• It would be good to learn about offline dating because it is more challenging than online.
• I will put them in that order. I feel that order because it seems like the right order to do It first learning yourself and then learning the world and then learning more about women
• Simple and straight to the point. And thats all I need because the title of the books didnt really grab my attention

This is a 0 option poll with 50 respondents targeting Household income range ($75 150k), Gender identity (Male), Relationship status (Single, Never Married), and Age range (35 44, 25 34). A sample of responses:

• I ranked the “How intelligent men find love” at number one because it was down to earth and grounded, and the second Line gave me a sense of peace that it would be off-line. I also regard myself as intelligent, which leads me to overthink approaches off-line. The second ranking that I put, I liked it, it just seemed more like a magazine headline. What enticed me was the word quality. I want a quality woman and I don’t think there are many quality women on dating apps because it’s the numbers game. The last ranking I did not like that title, I don’t particularly have problems having sex with women. The two methods are enticing. It makes me wonder what they are, I will give you that. But it just seems like a men’s health story and immature.
• Most people are looking for smart companion or someone smart thats compatible. But the sex part is for the horny people i believe.
• Option A is clearly just for attracting one-night-stands, which is the direct opposite of a healthy foundation to a long-term relationship. Absolutely toxic. Option B still implies a desire to meet multiple women (quantity over quality), so it's still questionable. Option C seems like a solid choice, as someone seeking a long-term fulfilling relationship would want a quality partner.
• Option C sounds the best with B following close behind. A just sounds cringy and all they want is sex, where the other two are more natural and looking for more then just sex.
• Too smart to be single sounds like a very articulate article just by reading the title. I feel if youre smart enough to be single you should be smart enough to navigate the dating scenes.

This is a 0 option poll with 100 respondents targeting Relationship status (Cohabitating With Significant Other, Married, Domestic Partnership / Civil Union) and Age range (35 44, 25 34). A sample of responses:

• Based on the content alone, I think a price between $20-$30 would be reasonable. I think anything under $20 is cheep, and anything over $30 is expensive. Even if it's over $30, I think it's still worth considering as long as it's under $40
• I didn't feel like there was anything particularly expensive in the box, so I think the price range should be relatively low. I think it should be between $20-$40. If it's over $50, they should add something that's worth it. Alternatively, they could make it a subscription format where new goods and products are delivery every few months for a low price, which could be good way to enjoy it casually.
• I don't think I need them because I'm not interesting. However I think it's fun gift box, as it could be a nice inspiration for a bored couple.
• Some customers have no knowledge and don't know where to start , so I thought a single product would be better. I thought it would be easier to try it out than a box from the beginning.
• i would consider purchasing this, seems like it has some interesting things in the package