The 'no cover' one. Unless the mom is spending a lot of time outdoors in cold winter temperatures, carrier B must be boiling hot. All of the baby's body heat radiating into the mother, then being contained within several layers instead of being allowed to escape.

I think I'd prefer it without the cover, especially in the hotter climate I live in.

I would go for option A, the baby looks comfortable, and I wouldn't worry if he/she gets enough air. It also looks practical in a better way. Only good thing about choice B is that is has pockets for the parent. But I would still go with option A.

I would prefer the carrier with the cover. I think that the child is more protected and not so exposed. I like that the legs are covered and the protection goes over a portion of his head also. The cover has a better design when it comes to a baby and I would feel more confident with a baby in the option A design

The cover is not worth an additional $25

There is no way 25 dollars makes it worth it to buy option B, so option A is an easy choice here. Also the photo for A looks significantly better than option B.

We just use a small blanket if we want a cover. I wouldn't spend $25 on it.

A is the one for me because of my personal needs and climate in my region. I like the style and design.

Your using for such a small amount of time I would buy the cheaper option without cover. Plus most likely when Im using it it will be warm out or inside

Not as bulky. I don’t think I would be using it where a cover would be necessary.

I would probably just opt for the single baby carrier for $50 because I don't think the cover is worth an additional $25. I don't think I would use it in any situation where I would need a cover, since it would only be useful for nice weather days anyways.

I would prefer to purchase the cover separately at a different time. It seems really expensive for what it is.

I prefer no cover. I think it looks safer for my baby

the cover doesnt really look safe, i would rather just cover the carrier with a blanket so i could keep better track of it.

I don't believethe value of the additional cover would be worth the price increase. I could simply use a swaddle or other baby blanket I already have to achieve the same result.

I don’t need a cover and have never used it for my baby’s, so I’d opt for the cheaper option without it.

i like the carrier without the cover because i dont think i would use the cover. i would rather be able to buy it as an add on then be forced to purchase it up front

I would buy the single carrier. I don’t need the cover.

I would only get the single carrier because my experience with such a product was that the baby tends to get really hot without any sort of cover, so I don't see the need. Thus option A is my choice.

The mother in option A seems more comfortable and at ease, the other mother in Option B seems uncomfortable and suffering from the bulkiness of the product.

I think the cover over the carrier is too hot for the baby. The mom would be miserable with that too because she would be carrying all of that heat too. It also just doesn’t look safe, like the baby can’t breathe. You can use a blanket you already have to drape over the baby if they are cold.

Not sure how much I would use the cover when I can just use a substitute. Also, at $25, it seems kind of pricey.

I think too many add ons are not worth it. They typically do not need to be used. They end up being donated or thrown away. I think it is a waste of money.

Just put a coat on. The cover is great for winter but what about summer when it's hot. I've found it is easy enough to put a coat on over a baby carrier when it is cold.

I live in the desert where the sun can be brutal, I would absolutely pick the one with the cover

The additional cover would make the baby more comfortable in the carrier.

I think the cover would be really beneficial and would be worth paying a little more for in case it's needed. However, it does seem like *a lot* more for a hood compared to without a hood.

It would be nice to have a bit of a cover in case the air is chilly outside.

you can use the product on different weathers

I would rather buy option B because it comes with an additional cover. I feel like having an additional cover would allow me to always have at least one clean.

Baby carrier with an additional cover just for 75$ is a better deal.

I like B the most because for a little bit more you can also have the cover for if it’s colder out or whatever reason you may want it for

The cover looks very useful. I would consider buying just that separately.

Baby's need all the protection they can get.

No picture is showing up for Option A, so I have to pick B. Having a carrier that allows you to be outside is a big deal. You don't want to your kid to be cold while you are going from the car to the store or while you are trying to unload groceries while it's cold and rainy outside.

I would rather have the cover version for extra warmth/privacy and versatility.

I would buy option B because I think the additional cover would be something that would be used a lot.

I like the baby carrier with additional cover. It's worth it for me since I live in colder weather and would help keep baby warmer and safe from rainy or snowy elements.

I like the additional cover, would be very useful in the colder months and nice to have a pocket.

I like that the cover would be detachable and for an extra 25$ it is great on price but can still be bought at the base price of 25$ sans cover.

Option B is my choice for the baby carrier due to the darker color and the material is more on the popular side of today.

Id rather have the added protection of the cover just in case.

I feel like an additional cover could be useful and protective for the elements.

I would choose the product with an additional cover because of the weather. Plus, I hated leaving my child's feet exposed to the elements. The cover allows you to touch the child as well, which is a plus. All in all - I'd pay extra for the one with the cover if it was cold or raining outside.

I had both of my sons in the winter time. I think this would have been super handy. I think it would have been worth it to have a cover.

I chose B because I usually want or need to cover the baby up more than I would want it open. Option A would be nicer for summer time when its super hot. As option B seems like a more colder weather type of item.

Option B is my preferred choice because the extra cover is well worth the cost.

Cover is more protection

More protection for the baby. Good quality product

Looks nicer May be more support for baby