Poll results

Save to favorites
Add this poll to your saved list for easy reference.
Welches der folgenden Stoffmarker Set Hauptbilder gefällt Ihnen besser und auf welches würden Sie eher draufklicken?
Show answers in:
8 Responses to Option A
It looks simpler and cleaner. The other looks a bit overloaded. Less is more.
I think the version without the handkerchief is better because the version on the right looks somehow very fake and therefore strange. Why are the pens called trick markers anyway? What's the trick there?
the whole thing looks more realistic on the white base
I like B better because the pen writes directly on fabric, so it suits the product better.
The product is well presented. You can clearly see that the pen writes for a very long time and that the colors are opaque. The packaging is eye-catching and the font is easy to read
It is clearer on the right. The piece of fabric on the left is annoying. However, I think the packaging looks like a pregnancy test.
The leaf or the fabric in variant B looks unnatural and does not match the rest of the advertising. The look of the packaging is very appealing and would tempt me to click if I needed such a pen.
I'm more likely to click on A because I think the cloth from B (on which the pen writes) looks funny
22 Responses to Option B
I chose B because it shows more
I find it more interesting that a piece of paper is depicted and the pencil draws on it.
At the same time, a fabric is drawn on picture B, on which is written, so the product can be immediately categorized as to what it is used for without reading
There is only one difference, but it is a crucial one. A pen has drawn something on a piece of fabric and thus shows an example of what the result looks like with the use of the pen.
It is clearer that the marker can be used for substances. This saves me having to read through it.
You can see better that you can paint fabric with it.
Picture with fabric and painted line as an example, so it makes a better impression and you can get an idea of it
On picture B it is easier to recognize that it is a marker for fabrics. There is also a spelling mistake in picture A ("Schreibversprehen")
I find the chosen and illustrated version with the fabric more sensible and more conducive to buying, as it immediately catches the eye and would personally be more likely to convince me to buy it than the one where the pen is drawing in the air.
It is easier to recognize that it is suitable for fabric by the fabric in the picture the other can also be understood as normal felt-tip pens
I like picture B better because the ribbon clearly shows that the pen can write for 200 meters. This makes it easier to imagine - it is very striking and appealing.
You can immediately see how to use the product later and how it works. I like that better than the other presentation
The image of my first choice doesn't look as sterile as the second option because of the cloth.
Because the picture shows fabric and that's what it's about and you can immediately see that it's about a fabric maker, much more appealing than the other picture
The selected fabric marker set shows how the pens work and looks realistic
I like B a little better, although there are hardly any differences. The difference lies in the writing surface of the trick marker set. With B, he writes on cloth, which is how it should be. I would like to see it in use.
I think the selected fabric marker picture is the best because it is the most obvious one for me
Don't see much difference. But in B there still seems to be material for first attempts. I would therefore opt for package B
I think B is better, you can see how it is written on a fabric
Because I simply like the look on the left better because it shows again what kind of surface you can write on with it
the presentation of variant b is more detailed and makes a more conscientious impression
because it immediately shows exactly what the pen is for. without the piece of fabric under the pen, it is not immediately obvious
Explore who answered your poll
Analyze your results with demographic reports.