Test marketing poll
50 Respondents General Population
This is a completed test marketing poll published on Sep 13, 2016.
The customer received 50 unbiased responses (votes & explanations) from the general population in about 39 minutes.
Using PickFu, customers are able to uncover actionable data from a diverse set of respondents for as little as $20.
Create Your Own Test Marketing PollWhich logo is more appealing?
Option A
29/50 votes
Which logo is more appealing?
50 Respondents General Population
Option A
29 votes
Option B
21 votes
Responses
| Responses to Option A | |
|---|---|
| 1 |
Bold makes all the difference here, the other one is hidden almost
|
| 2 |
The bottom line of text is bold and it looks more like the cohesive with the rest of the design
|
| 3 |
pretty much the same so I went with the one on the right
|
| 4 |
I like the bold font much better.
|
| 5 |
It is a little easier to read.
|
| 6 |
I selected this option because I do like the bold "Crowdsourced Decision-Making". Other than that, unless I need new glasses, I see no other differences.
|
| 7 |
I like the Bolded text on the bottom. It really brings the text into focus.
|
| 8 |
The font on A is a tad larger than B, and it's bolded so it draws the eye more. Also in terms of web optimization purposes, option B has the same line of text in a color that doesn't coincide with the rest of the colors in the logo unlike option A which uses the same shade of blue.
|
| 9 |
This one is a bit easier to read -- easier on the eyes.
|
| 10 |
The bold tagline sticks out more.
|
| 11 |
I like the bolder font
|
| 12 |
I like the clearer tagline in the darker font.
|
| 13 |
I strongly prefer Option A because I like the bolder font of "Crowdsourced Decision Making" under PickFu.
|
| 14 |
bolded tagline looks better
|
| 15 |
Bold matches well with rest of the bold font.
|
| 16 |
Image is much sharper.
|
| 17 |
easier to read subtext
|
| 18 |
I think the "Crowdsourced Decision Making" looks better with the bolder font.
|
| 19 |
Everything in the logo is already bold. The bolded font makes it feel much more part of the picture.
|
| 20 |
Looks a little better with the bigger font on bottom
|
| 21 |
I like the bolded type in option A. It is much clearer to read than option B.
|
| 22 |
The font style is more consistent.
|
| 23 |
I think the tagline font bold like in A.
|
| 24 |
The bold text makes it match better with the logo itself
|
| 25 |
The bolder font is more appealing.
|
| 26 |
Bolded text pops more.
|
| 27 |
thicker lettering looks more popping
|
| 28 |
A is easier to read
|
| 29 |
The darker text makes the logo stand out more. It does a better job at catching the eye
|
| Responses to Option B | |
|---|---|
| 1 |
The small text is a bit overwhelming when in boldface.
|
| 2 |
I think that A has too much bold text.
|
| 3 |
I think the bold writing in the other one takes away from the title.
|
| 4 |
The lettering of the subtitle is clearer in option B.
|
| 5 |
I chose B, but they honestly look identical to me.
|
| 6 |
This logo is more appealing because it looks cleaner.
|
| 7 |
I like the thinner font under PickFu
|
| 8 |
The font/color on the subscript works better on B
|
| 9 |
For some reason the non-bold one sticks out to me.
|
| 10 |
Option A has competing boldness. I like B's contrast.
|
| 11 |
I prefer the text style used in this option.
|
| 12 |
Crowdsourced doesn't need to be bolded, B is fine.
|
| 13 |
Prefer the placing of the letters more.
|
| 14 |
The font is a bit nicer and easier to read. Option A seems harsh with the heavy bold.
|
| 15 |
They are very similar but the color of the font on B looks better with a lighter shade versus the darker shade of A.
|
| 16 |
I prefer Option B, because Option A allows everything to be bold. Option B has more visual variety by letting the tag line be quieter; less bold.
|
| 17 |
Focuses on the brand more.
|
| 18 |
I really have no preference here; the boldness of the text is irrelevant. Nice logo though.
|
| 19 |
I think the bold letters takes away the professional look and makes an uneven font ratio.
|
| 20 |
It looks cleaner and more uniform
|
| 21 |
The bold text in 'A' is too visually intrusive.
|
Demographics
Gender
Male (0%)
| Trait | Percentage |
|---|---|
| Male (0%) | 0 |
| Female (0%) | 0 |
Age
3-17 (0%)
| Trait | Percentage |
|---|---|
| 3-17 (0%) | 0 |
| 18-34 (0%) | 0 |
| 35-49 (0%) | 0 |
| 50-64 (0%) | 0 |
| 65+ (0%) | 0 |
Income
$0-30k (0%)
| Trait | Percentage |
|---|---|
| $0-30k (0%) | 0 |
| $30-60k (0%) | 0 |
| $60-100k (0%) | 0 |
| $100k+ (0%) | 0 |
Ethnicity
White (0%)
| Trait | Percentage |
|---|---|
| White (0%) | 0 |
| Black (0%) | 0 |
| Asian (0%) | 0 |
| Hispanic (0%) | 0 |
| Other (0%) | 0 |
Education
High School (0%)
| Trait | Percentage |
|---|---|
| High School (0%) | 0 |
| College (0%) | 0 |
| Grad School (0%) | 0 |
Gender for Option A
Male (0%)
| Trait | Percentage |
|---|---|
| Male (0%) | 0 |
| Female (0%) | 0 |
Gender for Option B
Male (0%)
| Trait | Percentage |
|---|---|
| Male (0%) | 0 |
| Female (0%) | 0 |
Age for Option A
3-17 (0%)
| Trait | Percentage |
|---|---|
| 3-17 (0%) | 0 |
| 18-34 (0%) | 0 |
| 35-49 (0%) | 0 |
| 50-64 (0%) | 0 |
| 65+ (0%) | 0 |
Age for Option B
3-17 (0%)
| Trait | Percentage |
|---|---|
| 3-17 (0%) | 0 |
| 18-34 (0%) | 0 |
| 35-49 (0%) | 0 |
| 50-64 (0%) | 0 |
| 65+ (0%) | 0 |
Income for Option A
$0-30k (0%)
| Trait | Percentage |
|---|---|
| $0-30k (0%) | 0 |
| $30-60k (0%) | 0 |
| $60-100k (0%) | 0 |
| $100k+ (0%) | 0 |
Income for Option B
$0-30k (0%)
| Trait | Percentage |
|---|---|
| $0-30k (0%) | 0 |
| $30-60k (0%) | 0 |
| $60-100k (0%) | 0 |
| $100k+ (0%) | 0 |
Ethnicity for Option A
White (0%)
| Trait | Percentage |
|---|---|
| White (0%) | 0 |
| Black (0%) | 0 |
| Asian (0%) | 0 |
| Hispanic (0%) | 0 |
| Other (0%) | 0 |
Ethnicity for Option B
White (0%)
| Trait | Percentage |
|---|---|
| White (0%) | 0 |
| Black (0%) | 0 |
| Asian (0%) | 0 |
| Hispanic (0%) | 0 |
| Other (0%) | 0 |
Education for Option A
High School (0%)
| Trait | Percentage |
|---|---|
| High School (0%) | 0 |
| College (0%) | 0 |
| Grad School (0%) | 0 |
Education for Option B
High School (0%)
| Trait | Percentage |
|---|---|
| High School (0%) | 0 |
| College (0%) | 0 |
| Grad School (0%) | 0 |