The cheapest $610 option to save time and money. A direct flight of 1000 is not worth it, and I'm not interested in a half day trip in Rome either.

I would opt for option 3 ($610). I've flown a lot in my life and I really don't mind a 4-hour layover. It's the 12.5-hour layover in Rome for $700 that I would hate to take. I don't like long layovers and I really dislike the added stress of making sure I am back at the airport in time for my connecting flight. I really do like connecting flights, but if I can save nearly $400, I will take it.

I would prefer to go on the flight that includes the Rome city experience because that one seems more reasonably priced and has more interesting experiences packed into it than the other flight options.

I would check the lowest option, because the price for the flight would be the least amount of money that I would spend

I would choose the first option. It may be more expensive, but it is a direct flight. I always prefer direct flights because they reduce travel times and also eliminate any problems that might occur with transfers (lost luggage, connecting flight delays or cancellations, etc.).

I prefer the direct flight option, although it's high in cost, I still prefer it over the rest of the other options with reduced price and all. I've always been a fan of direct flights. It's just my thing. Yes, I'll pay a thousand dollars.

I would choose the second option. The second option would work best for me and my needs. I like this option because it gives me the freedom that I need and the time that would best suit me. I like how the options are set up overall but the second option is the one that I would choose amongst the choices that are available. I feel that I would have the most flexibility with the second choice

I would definitely take the one with the full day layover for 700 bucks I get my trip and a tour to Rome for only an additional $100

I would choose the first option, the direct flight for $1000, because otherwise the travel day is too long and tiring

I would chose the $610 flight because it is the cheapest. I wouldn't be interested in the mini tour. I would just be looking to get to my final destination.

I would choose the cheapest option. I don’t mind that the layover is a little longer. I would want to save the undress of dollars and I think Rome has a nice airport for a layover

I would choose the third option because it's the cheapest flight and the second fastest arrival. While I prefer direct flights, the cost differential is way too much. I also would avoid any layover that is 10 hr, it's longer than the direct flight itself and is too short of a time to really do anything other than wait it out.

I would choose the middle option, as it would be a lot less expensive and still be able to successfully complete my intent.

I really like the fact that it gives you many options. Also like the fact with a layover it provides options for dinner with pickup. from an Italian or you can just choose to stay at the airport. The difference in prices for a layover is extremely appealing if you aren't in a hurry to return to New York.

I would go with the cheapest option which includes a 4 hour wait. I enjoy hanging out at airports and think the cost difference versus direct is enough to wait around. I do not want to leave the airport and did not like the second option at all, would feel too stressed.