{"app_id":"fyv2a0qw"}

Head-to-head

Poll complete
50 people answered in 25 minutes.
50 US-based respondentsFebruary 26, 2019Public
February 26, 2019Public

Q: Which website name sounds better? My store will sell alpaca socks, sweaters, blankets, and other alpaca wool items. Thank you

Head-to-head poll

Statistically significant
2nd place
Alpaca Approved
A
14 votes

28%
PickFu winner
Alpaca Outpost
B
36 votes

72%

AI Summary

We’re still gathering data. Your AI summary will be automatically generated after your poll completes, please check back in a few minutes.

Ask PickFu

Ask natural language questions about your poll to our custom AI engine. Don’t worry, it’s friendly.

Log in as poll owner to use Ask PickFu.
Response flags
0
Keywords
25
19
16
13


Gender identity
21
28
1
Age range
16
17
8
8
1
A
14 responses
A

I like the alliterative nature of the title.

A

This name sounds more friendly and is reassuring that the alpacas that the wool comes from are well taken care of.

A

It rolls off the tongue better mentally. It is a more recognizable name!

A

I think the approval part is ideal for marketing and it seems to grab a potential customer's attention better from a logistical and marketing standpoint.

A

The allusion makes it roll off the tongue more.

A

Cute name for wool items! I love working with alpaca yarn and I think "Alpaca Approved" would grab my attention. Plus, it made me smile and gives an immediate visual of smug alpaca.

A

This name is cute and has a better sound to it.

A

I like the alliteration.

A

I like the double A names for the title

A

Option A sounds more caring, as if the Alpaca have given their permission and have been treated respectfully. Option B gives me the impression of an old western movie where the trappers would go to sell their furs just for money, mass murder if you will.

A

Alpaca Approved to me sounds more ethical and more inviting. However, if the items are not ethically made then i would go with the other option.

A

It's catchy you know

A

I like the double A in the name.

A

I like the alliteration. It is easy to remember.

B
36 responses
B

I love the word outpost and it applies very well for the name of the shop.

B

An outpost sounds more like a store for selling things.

B

this one is more attractive to me and I would visit this one first. Just seems more authentic.

B

For a website Alpaca Outpost is better, just because it sort of specifies a location or destination. For a clothing line though I'd definitely go with Alpaca Approved.

B

Option A doesnt sound like a website name.... I'm not crazy ab out Alpaca Outpost either but atleast it seems like a noun.

B

I like B because it sounds like a cool nature store

B

The word outpost lends itself more to the name of a store.

B

Sounds more store like

B

I like the way this sounds together. Rolls off the tongue well

B

"Outpost" is more common and sounds more standard and fitting for a shop selling goods.

B

I think b sounds better for selling the most. You could always use the Alpaca approved as a slogan for Alpaca Outpost.

B

Alpaca Outpost sounds kind of Wild West which is fun. Alpaca Approved sounds more generic.

B

Outpost sounds like a store that sells socks/sweaters/other outdoorsy or warm clothing and accessories. I guess I find "Alpaca Approved" acceptable but I think it is less obvious the kind of things that it would be selling. (Fiber? Yarn? Food for Alpacas?)

B

I like this name because it sounds outdoorsy and the name is memorable. The other one sounds a little silly because it makes me think alpacas are giving their approval to the products.

B

I really think choice B is much better. It sounds smoother, and sounds like a great store name. I think that would be much better and really stand out in comparison to choice A. Alpaca Outpost would be a great site name for selling alpaca-related goods.

B

I like the sound of B it sticks with you more than the word approved

B

Option B has a more comprehensible connotation, I believe. Whereas Alpaca Approved comes off as a bit confusing, Alpaca Outpost signifies first and foremost that it is an "outpost," a one-stop shop for Alpaca based gear, but additionally, it lends the brand a bit of out-doorsy credential.

B

I liked B better because it sounds like it is run by Alpacas - Option A is just boring! B brings to mind open spaces in the mountains - "manned" totally by Alpacas - kind of a tourist trap, but you gotta go! (think Wall Drug in SD)

B

Outpost is a kind of store, so I think this fits better

B

Sounds like a place where trading happens.

B

B: It sounds like exclusively Alpaca quality products. Whereas, A sounds like other products are sold there, too.

B

I think B sounds better and fits with the idea of it being a store. Alpaca Approved sounds odd to me and not like a online retail store even if it is selling alpaca items.

B

It sounds like a community

B

This has a much smoother sound and flow to it.

B

I chose B because it sounded more firm and sure of what they have in the store. The store is owning its products by using the word "outpost" like in a military. It sounded more confident.

B

Choice B gives me more of a "outdoorsy" but professional vibe, while choice A gives me more of a playful vibe. Choice A is a fine choice too, but B seems to fit the theme of the items better.

B

looks great for brand name

B

I really like this one. The Alpaca Approved can be the guarantee.

B

I don't know, this one just rolls off the tongue nicer

B

It just stirred a vision of a rustic outpost with alpaca blankets. I like the sound of it.

B

this fits for what the store will be selling so it stands out too

B

Option B seems better for the type of items sold in the store.

B

The word "Outpost" reminds me of the outdoors. I believe this name goes very well with the items for sale at the store.

B

B because it kind of rhymes.

B

The word "Outpost" in the title tells me that things are for sale on the site. The other title does not tell me that. Only that the items on the site would be Alpaca approved.

B

The other option sounds more like it sells things *for* alpacas, not made of alpaca wool.

Subscribe to PickFu+ to unlock AI highlights on every poll.

Or, unlock AI features for this poll as a one-time $29 add-on.

AI analysis (sample data)

Unearth more insights with a detailed poll report, discovering what respondents liked, disliked, and what to do next.

Survey Analysis

Winning Option: Characteristics and Appeal

  • Option B emerged as the preferred brand packaging design, securing 12 out of 15 votes. Respondents frequently highlighted its aesthetic appeal, emphasizing the luxurious and high-quality impression it conveys. The ability to stack packages was a notable practical advantage mentioned by participants.
  • Several respondents appreciated the monochrome color scheme of Option B, which they found less overwhelming compared to more colorful designs. This preference for simplicity suggests that minimalistic designs may resonate well with this group.
  • Additionally, environmental considerations played a role in favoring Option B; some participants noted its reduced plastic usage and recyclability as attractive features.

Key Topics Across Options

  1. Aesthetic Appeal: Across both options, aesthetics were crucial in influencing preferences. Participants often referred to colors and overall design quality when justifying their choices.

  2. Environmental Concerns: Both options had respondents who valued environmentally friendly aspects of packaging. However, while Option A was praised for being reusable and eco-friendly by some, others perceived Option B’s reduced plastic use as more sustainable.

  3. Practicality: Practical elements such as ease of stacking (Option B) or suitability for travel (Option B) were significant factors in decision-making processes.

Hypotheses for Further Testing

  • Investigate whether minimalistic designs consistently outperform colorful ones across different demographic groups or product categories.

  • Explore if environmental messaging on packaging significantly influences consumer preference when compared with other attributes like luxury perception or practicality.

  • Assess how important stacking capability is relative to other functional benefits in various contexts such as home storage versus travel convenience.

These hypotheses can guide further research into understanding deeper consumer motivations behind packaging preferences observed in this survey context.

AI themes (sample data)

Learn what respondents like and dislike about your poll based on sentiments analyzed by our AI.
A

Likes (sample data)

  • Sleek and modern design
  • Large ear cup sizes for comfort
  • Minimalist and streamlined look

Dislikes (sample data)

  • Lack of unique features or standout elements
  • White color may get dirty easily
  • Not as much cushioning as other options
B

Likes (sample data)

  • (Note: There were no positive mentions specific to Option B in the provided survey answers)

Dislikes (sample data)

  • (Note: There were no negative mentions specific to Option B in the provided survey answers)
C

Likes (sample data)

  • Unique and stylish metallic grating design
  • Sturdy and flexible build
  • 'Cool' aesthetic appeal

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'Weird' or unpleasant cone shape for earmuffs
  • 'Odd' overall appearance with metallic accents
  • (Note: Third negative mention not available from provided survey answers)
D

Likes (sample data)

  • Comfortable and sturdy design
  • Aesthetic appeal, including color options
  • Familiarity with the brand's quality

Dislikes (sample data)

  • Negative perception of the brand logo
  • Smaller ear size perceived as less comfortable
  • Design not preferred compared to others
E

Likes (sample data)

  • Sleek, modern, and professional look
  • Comfortable fit with larger ear sections that cup the ears well
  • Minimalist and clean black aesthetic

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'Flat' appearance perceived as less comfortable by some
  • 'Bulky' design disliked by a few respondents
  • Narrower piece near headband' not appealing to all users
F

Likes (sample data)

  • 'Cushiony padding' for comfort over long periods of use
  • 'Solid build' making it durable and secure on the head/ears
  • Preferred neutral colors like black for headphones

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'Large ear covering' may be too big for some users’ preferences
  • 'Separation of controls/buttons' not liked by everyone
  • 'Chrome accent rings on headband' not appealing to all respondents
G

Likes (sample data)

  • Design perceived as high quality and appealing
  • Liked the color, especially the blue
  • Thin padding was appreciated

Dislikes (sample data)

  • Looked flimsy to some respondents
  • Perceived as less sturdy compared to other options
  • Color preference for white or black over blue
H

Likes (sample data)

  • Modern and high-quality appearance with a white design
  • Comfortable padding on headband and ears
  • Sleek and neutral look preferred by many

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'White' color seen as prone to getting dirty easily
  • 'Large ear cups' might be problematic for glasses wearers over long periods of use
  • 'Sturdy design' could be considered bulky by some users