Showing who the thread will be about in the first tweet catches my attention more.

I like knowing who the famous people are.

A because it reveals the people instead of being vague like in B.

The celebrities really sparks my curiosity. Well written and easy to understand.

In above the content is based on the twitter statements I choose the option A because this statements are easy to understand and a valuable things also so I choose this option.

I would be more likely to click on this one because it includes famous people that I know about. I recognize most of the names so I know what I will be learning more about by clicking on it

Because the names of people I recognize are mentioned which gets me intrigued.

I'd rather read A because it mentions some interesting people.

I like option A the most because I like that it includes the specific performers.

I prefer option A because this tweet seems more personable due to naming famous people, this is intriguing and relatable.

I prefer Option A because it is more surprising, compelling and thought provoking.

In this case I think names would make more of an impact, gives me a better idea of what/who you're actually talking about.

Even though it's a very long tweet, it at least has several possible names that will grab the attention of many compared to Option B which is very vague and not filled with much anticipation.

I like the people being named. It helps see who the person tweeting is actually talking about.

i like the individuals names specifically, just the number 7 means nothing to me but The Rock on the other hand...

I picked A as my top choice as the tweet tells me what people he studied.

reading a makes me actually want to know what elon musk and taylor swift have in common

I think I'm most likely to choose A because I recognize some of the names of the people listed.

I prefer the option A tweet message because I like how the message describes what seven world-class performers this message is going to talk about because I am very interested in Elon Musk, Charlie Munger and the Rock. I would want to hear one fact, lesson and quote from these three people the most.

The names really grab my attention. I like people like Elon Musk and The Rock.

Normally you want to be brief but in this instance naming names is GOOD. I think A is better. Chances are high someone looking at this will recognize someone that THEY are a fan of. You got 'em.

I like that it includes the names of the 7 performers so I know who I would be reading about.

I prefer seeing the names specifically rather than just a reference to "7 world-class performers"

Seeing who he is talking about is much more appealing. As a fan of at least one of the celebrities listed, that would get me to click.

I think including the names of the individuals is more attention grabbing than just '7 world-class performers'

Charlie Munger got my attention!

It's nice to know which ones he's talking about

I picked A because I at least knew which performers were included.

I think mentioning Elon Musk, Taylor Swift, and other successful people will be more eye-catching for me.

Knowing who's quotes interest me more plus I love Taylor and The Rock

I like A better as its asking a question and that makes me want to find out the answer.

I think choice A is the most interesting because the beginning of the tweet really sets up the ending of it perfectly and it makes me want to learn more about what he has to say.

I made this choice because I feel that the names and the way it is presented proves that this will get more attention and make me feel that I am more popular.

I'd probably check out the rest of this thread based on the tweet

It's catchy and to the point.

I don't recognize half of the celebrities in option A and thus wouldn't click to read more.

This simple message is more impactful for understanding their story

I would be more likely to click on option B to read the rest of the thread because it is more concise, which makes it more likely that I would read it in the first place. However, I also think that it is interesting enough and attention-grabbing enough to make me want to read more.

I think the framing in B is more effective because it keeps my interest. While I didn't like A as much because it seems too related to the start to a joke, even though that's not the intent.

I was already bored by the long list of names in Option A. It's just too much information before it even gets to the point. In this case, I like the clear, concise set up of Option B.

You narrow your audience when you list the names as some people may not like one or many of the names you provided.

I don't need to see the names of the people that he interacted with I will see that when I read further.

B is much more straightforward and does not have added fluff to it.

I like that B is more vague.

I prefer option B. I would rather it be a surprise who the quotes and find out and be surprised as I go through it. Otherwise I would be anticipating what they are.

I'd be more likely to click not knowing those are the people who will be interviewed.

I prefer option B looks simple. I find it is easy to understand.

I like the tweet in option B better because the language is more concise and sounds more active compared to option A.

I would click on Option B. It's simple, less wording, enticing and would encourage me to read further into this tweet.

I think B is the better tweet because it doesn't name-drop specific performers. I like that this is more of a tease and it does not seem like blatant clout-chasing.