{"app_id":"fyv2a0qw"}

Open-ended

Poll complete
50 people answered in about 1 hour.
50 US-based respondentsWeed/CBD consumerAmazon Prime subscribersAugust 24, 2023Public
August 24, 2023Public

Q: Based on the Product design Cannabis Weed Large GRINDER Combinated together with Stash Jar. Size 2.5 inch. Would you buy that GRINDER for Cannabis? Why? What would be your requirements for that Cannabis Grinder?

Open-ended poll

null option image

AI Summary

The survey results reveal several common themes among the respondents' opinions on the Cannabis Weed Large Grinder with Stash Jar. Firstly, many participants expressed positive sentiments towards the product, highlighting its good size, multiple screens for filtering kief, and ease of cleaning as key requirements for a cannabis grinder. Additionally, some respondents appreciated the combination of a grinder and stash jar in one product, emphasizing its convenience for storing weed. Others mentioned that they preferred a discreet design that does not resemble a drug device and expressed interest in having additional features such as decoration or being smell-proof.

On the other hand, there were also individuals who stated they would not purchase this particular grinder due to concerns about its appearance or functionality. Some mentioned that it looked cheap or basic compared to their existing grinders. Others raised issues regarding potential sticking of cannabis to the sides of the grinder or desired more specific measurements before making a decision.

Based on these survey results, several hypotheses can be proposed for further testing. One hypothesis could be whether adding decorative elements or incorporating smell-proof technology would enhance consumer interest in purchasing this product. Another hypothesis could explore whether offering different sizes or designs that cater to various preferences would increase sales potential among different consumer segments. Additionally, investigating how price influences purchase decisions could be another valuable area of research.

Overall, these findings provide insights into consumers' preferences and requirements when considering purchasing a cannabis grinder with stash jar combination product. Conducting further research based on these hypotheses can help refine and optimize future iterations of this product to better meet consumer needs and expectations.

Ask PickFu

Ask natural language questions about your poll to our custom AI engine. Don’t worry, it’s friendly.

Log in as poll owner to use Ask PickFu.
Response flags
0
Keywords
25
22
11
10


Gender identity
20
28
2
Amazon Prime member
49
1
Age range
10
25
10
4
1
Weed / CBD consumer
50
Responses50

Yes, Good size, many screens and easy to clean. Meets all my requirements.

This is much bigger than any grinder I've ever owned. However, I really like the simple black design and the stash compartment.

I would probably not buy this. Frankly, it looks cheap. I guess it could be a travel product though. If I were camping I might consider it.For good weed, I need something that doesn't grind it up too fine and diminish the quality of the bud

I might buy this but it does not look very interesting. I would prefer to have some kind of decoration or design and I would want to know it was smell-proof.

I think this looks nice. It looks like it would be effective. It looks like it would be easy to store the weed and not spill any. The grinder needs to really grind the weed down and not leave any chunks of it

I already have a grinder that is similar, so no, I would not purchasrethis one as it is quite basic

It looks like a good grinder and like it would separate the keif from the flower.

Yes I'd buy a grinder for my cannabis, I actually use one now anyways. It needs to not stick, and it needs to make sure it grinds efficiently.

No, I would not buy it because I already have this product. It is excellent and I consider it a necessity.

Yes I love that it combine the grinder and stash jar. It makes it easy to store the weed. I also like how it does not stand out .

Sure. I like how it doesn't look like a drug device. It also looks like it would be easy to clean.

No, I think normal spice grinder could be used.

Yes, I would buy it as it is compact and is probably easy to use.

I would buy a grinder that size. Requirements would be it is easy to use and clean and I don't lose bits of bud when trying to clean.

I really like this design. I have not seen too many grinders like this. Only issue, not a big one, would be how easily the cannabis would stick to the sides and clog it up.

This appears to be a fully inclusive product that has several uses and would be an appealing item to purchase.

Yes, I would buy it, especially if it held the scent in the jar. That's a big concern for me.

I would buy it as it is like having two products in one. It works very well as you don't need to have to containers.

I definitely would. I like that this jar specifically has a storage component for the cannabis itself. I would want the grinder to be as smooth as possible, and easy to use.

I would buy this because of multiple keif catches which makes the keif very fine aat the end. I really like this and would buy it right away as long as the second filter has finer screen.

Yes, I like that it's a small size but also has a stash jar to store your weed.

Yes, I'd buy it. The jar would hold enough for daily use while the rest remained in a glass jar; I like a grinder with a more spiked design for ease of breaking apart the cannabis more easily without gunking up quickly.

I think that I would yes. It appears to have several compartments which would be great at filtering out the smaller stuff into kief.

Sure, if the price is reasonable. It looks good and looks like a standard grinder.

I'm not really interested in a combination grinder and jar for cannabis. I only grind what I intend to use fairly immediately. I store in the packages I purchase in.

Yes, grinder make the process easier and prevent my fingers from getting sticky. The grinder should be small, effective and high quality.

I am a heavy weed smoker and I can say right off the start that the top is too small. I want to be able to crush a lot all at once, and I want to make sure that it grinds well, and doesn't get stuck. The stash jar is cool, but I can find other places to keep my weed. So for all of those reasons I wouldn't buy. Make it maybe a little smaller than the average can of coca cola. maybe like 3/4's the size. That way its big enough to hold a lot, but small enough to keep in your pocket if needed. Hope this helped!

The parts and use are fairly self-explanatory, but I'd like to see additional measurements since it stacks pretty high.

If I were in the market for a grinder I might consider buying this product. I like that it combines both a grinder and a storage area in one single product. But, I cannot tell from the images if the product is durable or high quality. I would want to read reviews prior to purchasing.

I would not buy this model only because it is pretty big. I would need that many "levels" for my grinder to be effective for me.

I might buy it if the price was reasonable. I like that it's all one color.

I think the grinder looks well constructed and I like that it has so many components.

I will buy the cannabis grinder because I like it design and how appealing it appears.

I would buy it. It looks small, portable, and structurally good. I think it would be rugged and work well. Those are my requirements. I don't want something flimsy that would break.

It looks small and compact. I think it would be portable and not take up much space in my purse. It looks like it would do the job.

No, I do not have a need for this type of product.

I don't grow cannabis, so I would have no need of a grinder. For people who have that need, it looks like a good product.

The material of the product looks premium and the design of the product looks beautiful. The grinder needed for hassle free work and the size of the product looks handy and comfortable. the product looks like a lens of the camera so it is unique in design. That's why I have an interest to buy the product.

If it grinds it right into the jar and I don't have to separate the top from the bottom then it would be a good buy, and if it could do other herbs the I would be even more interested

yes I would purchase the grinder and I guess the answer would be why not? lol And it's honestly I think it would be really handy and my requirements for a grinder would be aluminum and the size of the storage capacity which I think about two inches diameter would be good.

I think I would purchase it because I do not actually have a grinder, but ironically I have been thinking about buying one. I do not understand all the details of how it works, quality, what to look for, but I am assuming the function is rather simple. That being said, I would buy this grinder, specifically because it does come with a stash jar. It is also a sleek design, is black, and it would provide a simple but probably needed function easily.

It looks nice and high-quality, but there are too many piece. I prefer a simpler grinder than this. I prefer the product to be easy to undo and I am afraid it would not be.

This looks like a good grinder. I like that it has multiple trays and chambers. The grip looks solid as well.

No I wouldn't because the color is too boring. I like personality. I do like the overall design though and looks really superior to others

I would, but honestly, maybe not the one pictured, as the grinding side doesn't look very sharp or capable of grinding much of anything.

I don't use cannabis so I wouldn't would buy

Sure. It looks pretty sleek and modern. I like the stacked design. I would mostly require it to be easy to use.

Sure if I needed my cannabis fined grinded, then I would buy this product. Looks sturdy.

I will buy this cannabis grinder. Requirement for cannabis grinder will be to be it grind very well and faster

I personally probably would not as I prefer edible cannabis over smoking

Subscribe to PickFu+ to unlock AI highlights on every poll.

Or, unlock AI features for this poll as a one-time $29 add-on.

AI analysis (sample data)

Unearth more insights with a detailed poll report, discovering what respondents liked, disliked, and what to do next.

Survey Analysis

Winning Option: Characteristics and Appeal

  • Option B emerged as the preferred brand packaging design, securing 12 out of 15 votes. Respondents frequently highlighted its aesthetic appeal, emphasizing the luxurious and high-quality impression it conveys. The ability to stack packages was a notable practical advantage mentioned by participants.
  • Several respondents appreciated the monochrome color scheme of Option B, which they found less overwhelming compared to more colorful designs. This preference for simplicity suggests that minimalistic designs may resonate well with this group.
  • Additionally, environmental considerations played a role in favoring Option B; some participants noted its reduced plastic usage and recyclability as attractive features.

Key Topics Across Options

  1. Aesthetic Appeal: Across both options, aesthetics were crucial in influencing preferences. Participants often referred to colors and overall design quality when justifying their choices.

  2. Environmental Concerns: Both options had respondents who valued environmentally friendly aspects of packaging. However, while Option A was praised for being reusable and eco-friendly by some, others perceived Option B’s reduced plastic use as more sustainable.

  3. Practicality: Practical elements such as ease of stacking (Option B) or suitability for travel (Option B) were significant factors in decision-making processes.

Hypotheses for Further Testing

  • Investigate whether minimalistic designs consistently outperform colorful ones across different demographic groups or product categories.

  • Explore if environmental messaging on packaging significantly influences consumer preference when compared with other attributes like luxury perception or practicality.

  • Assess how important stacking capability is relative to other functional benefits in various contexts such as home storage versus travel convenience.

These hypotheses can guide further research into understanding deeper consumer motivations behind packaging preferences observed in this survey context.

AI themes (sample data)

Learn what respondents like and dislike about your poll based on sentiments analyzed by our AI.
A

Likes (sample data)

  • Sleek and modern design
  • Large ear cup sizes for comfort
  • Minimalist and streamlined look

Dislikes (sample data)

  • Lack of unique features or standout elements
  • White color may get dirty easily
  • Not as much cushioning as other options
B

Likes (sample data)

  • (Note: There were no positive mentions specific to Option B in the provided survey answers)

Dislikes (sample data)

  • (Note: There were no negative mentions specific to Option B in the provided survey answers)
C

Likes (sample data)

  • Unique and stylish metallic grating design
  • Sturdy and flexible build
  • 'Cool' aesthetic appeal

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'Weird' or unpleasant cone shape for earmuffs
  • 'Odd' overall appearance with metallic accents
  • (Note: Third negative mention not available from provided survey answers)
D

Likes (sample data)

  • Comfortable and sturdy design
  • Aesthetic appeal, including color options
  • Familiarity with the brand's quality

Dislikes (sample data)

  • Negative perception of the brand logo
  • Smaller ear size perceived as less comfortable
  • Design not preferred compared to others
E

Likes (sample data)

  • Sleek, modern, and professional look
  • Comfortable fit with larger ear sections that cup the ears well
  • Minimalist and clean black aesthetic

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'Flat' appearance perceived as less comfortable by some
  • 'Bulky' design disliked by a few respondents
  • Narrower piece near headband' not appealing to all users
F

Likes (sample data)

  • 'Cushiony padding' for comfort over long periods of use
  • 'Solid build' making it durable and secure on the head/ears
  • Preferred neutral colors like black for headphones

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'Large ear covering' may be too big for some users’ preferences
  • 'Separation of controls/buttons' not liked by everyone
  • 'Chrome accent rings on headband' not appealing to all respondents
G

Likes (sample data)

  • Design perceived as high quality and appealing
  • Liked the color, especially the blue
  • Thin padding was appreciated

Dislikes (sample data)

  • Looked flimsy to some respondents
  • Perceived as less sturdy compared to other options
  • Color preference for white or black over blue
H

Likes (sample data)

  • Modern and high-quality appearance with a white design
  • Comfortable padding on headband and ears
  • Sleek and neutral look preferred by many

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'White' color seen as prone to getting dirty easily
  • 'Large ear cups' might be problematic for glasses wearers over long periods of use
  • 'Sturdy design' could be considered bulky by some users