{"app_id":"fyv2a0qw"}

Head-to-head

Poll complete
50 people answered in about 1 hour.
50 US-based respondents $101k+ earners $61-100k earnersDecember 16, 2021Public
December 16, 2021Public

Q: Your car is dirty and you would like it to be washed. You found a new service that will deliver a car wash right to your house. Would you rather:

Head-to-head poll

Not statistically significant
PickFu winner
Order on-demand and get your car cleaned now.
A
29 votes

58%
2nd place
Schedule a time for the wash to happen in the next week.
B
21 votes

42%

AI Summary

We’re still gathering data. Your AI summary will be automatically generated after your poll completes, please check back in a few minutes.

Ask PickFu

Ask natural language questions about your poll to our custom AI engine. Don’t worry, it’s friendly.

Log in as poll owner to use Ask PickFu.
Response flags
0
Keywords
23
18
13
12


Gender identity
17
32
1
Racial or ethnic identity
4
5
12
26
3
Education level
2
2
5
22
19
Homeownership
39
11
Employment status
6
2
1
40
1
Primary mode of transportation
50
Podcast listener
39
11
Cryptocurrency investments
33
13
4
Credit score
2
4
8
31
5
Age range
7
23
13
5
2
Type of residence
9
41
Hobbies and interests
17
9
15
5
4
35
4
33
27
31
9
9
3
12
23
1
20
21
20
1
Social media platforms
40
33
18
8
24
9
8
25
1
A
29 responses
A

I like the order on demand and get my clean car cleaned whenever I can

A

I prefer the on-demand car cleaning service.

A

I don't want to wait a week to get my car washed. If having to wait, I could go somewhere local.

A

I like fast service and if my car needs to be clean, I typically want it to be cleaned right away and waiting one week is too long.

A

I am not a very patient person, so I would like to be able to get it done immediately.

A

I chose A because if my car was dirty, I would want it cleaned ASAP. Scheduling is always a pain and it tends to be hard to coordinate between a company and my working hours.

A

If my car is dirty now I would like to be able to get it washed as soon as possible.

A

I don't usually think of scheduling my wash in advance. I see my car and think it needs a wash so I think being able to get one on demand would be more useful.

A

I would rather know when it is being done. If I notice it needs done now I would want it done now.

A

i'd rather just do it whenever it's convenient for me in the moment rather than having to schedule and set a reminder and remember to do it.

A

Order on demand sounds as if I can get this done on the spur of the moment. Schedule indicates a time in the future.

A

I typically want my car cleaned when it is dirty, not a week or two afterwards. I would most likely clean it myself if I had to wait a week.

A

I would much rather have the car cleaned now than later, so I think the option A product service is more functional and useful for me and my car.

A

Order now. If I schedule for Tuesday and its going to rain on Wednesday, do I want to spend the money? There are many variables and planning may not be the best option.

A

In today's day and age, on demand services are preferable. That way, the customer can customize their appointment to their schedule.

A

I am not the type of person to schedule anything, I like to be spontaneous so the option of having it on demand would be more appealing then having to schedule at a later time.

A

sooner i can get it done the better

A

I would want my car to be washed right away cause if it's dirty and I want it washed then I want it done now. Plus you don't know how the weather is going to be during the week and you don't want to schedule time and then it rains on that day

A

I want my car to be clean right now to maintain my car, so I choose A.

A

When I need something cleaned, it's typically for now

A

I chose A because I would like it to happen when I was thinking of it and would rather it now than to wait for it.

A

If I have to wait, I’ll just wash it myself. It’s not hard to do. I prefer choice A

A

I think that it would be great to have both options. However, if I had to pick one, I would choose option A because it is the most appealing and convenient option.

A

I want it on demand, typically I wait until I want it to happen, I don't want to put it off a few days.

A

This provides me with more flexibility and works around my schedule better.

A

I hate a dirty car. I would want it to come right away. I live around a lot of trees and pollen and birds and mud and have a white car. I want my car clean all the time, it is a pet peeve to have a dirty car! I would choose option A every single time!

A

Clean now definitely, I would love to see how the service works and save time. It has to be at a good price

A

I definitely prefer on-demand because I never know what my schedule is going to be.

A

I would choose on demand and get it cleaned now as it seems like the better service and you get it done right away.

B
21 responses
B

I like to plan things out. It 's more expensive if you do on demand as well.

B

I would choose Option B because I would rather schedule a time for the wash to happen so I can prepare to be available next week to have my car washed.

B

I would most likely schedule a time. This is better for me personally since i am barely ever available right on demand.

B

My experience with on demand is that it's not consistent. Sometimes they can get to you right away, but if they're backed up, might as well schedule.

B

It seemed easier to schedule a car wash later, than work it in sooner.

B

I like option B the best because I would like the peace of mind of knowing exactly when the wash would happen.

B

I want to make sure I will be at home and available for the car wash

B

I want the time scheduled I dont ant people showing up I wish i could do same day

B

I like being able to schedule the visit and it seems more all-encompassing since I could presumably schedule it for the next available time slot (which might be right now).

B

I would rather schedule so that I can be prepared for the company to come and clean the car. On demand would not work because I would not be prepared.

B

I prefer the scheduled time.

B

Ordering on-demand seems like it will be more expensive.

B

I would just schedule this to happen next week. I think the on-demand is cool though. I could see myself changing my habits to do an on-demand. All dependent on the price but seems a cool idea.

B

My schedule is so busy the I would prefer to schedule at a time that is better for me.

B

I usually need the car for something over the course of a day or two. Scheduling it out allows me to plan for the service, which is nice.

B

I am a scheduled person. I need to know when I am going to do it so I can plan around it.

B

I'd rather schedule a time that is convenient and maybe make it a regular visit.

B

I would prefer option B. I think that this gives me more flexibility to plan out the car wash in advance, as this is not an urgent situation that requires immediate attention.

B

Option B makes the process sound more streamlined and like i would be able to get it done sooner.

B

I would rather plan a time in the future.

B

I am in no rush so I would rather have it done next week.

Subscribe to PickFu+ to unlock AI highlights on every poll.

Or, unlock AI features for this poll as a one-time $29 add-on.

AI analysis (sample data)

Unearth more insights with a detailed poll report, discovering what respondents liked, disliked, and what to do next.

Survey Analysis

Winning Option: Characteristics and Appeal

  • Option B emerged as the preferred brand packaging design, securing 12 out of 15 votes. Respondents frequently highlighted its aesthetic appeal, emphasizing the luxurious and high-quality impression it conveys. The ability to stack packages was a notable practical advantage mentioned by participants.
  • Several respondents appreciated the monochrome color scheme of Option B, which they found less overwhelming compared to more colorful designs. This preference for simplicity suggests that minimalistic designs may resonate well with this group.
  • Additionally, environmental considerations played a role in favoring Option B; some participants noted its reduced plastic usage and recyclability as attractive features.

Key Topics Across Options

  1. Aesthetic Appeal: Across both options, aesthetics were crucial in influencing preferences. Participants often referred to colors and overall design quality when justifying their choices.

  2. Environmental Concerns: Both options had respondents who valued environmentally friendly aspects of packaging. However, while Option A was praised for being reusable and eco-friendly by some, others perceived Option B’s reduced plastic use as more sustainable.

  3. Practicality: Practical elements such as ease of stacking (Option B) or suitability for travel (Option B) were significant factors in decision-making processes.

Hypotheses for Further Testing

  • Investigate whether minimalistic designs consistently outperform colorful ones across different demographic groups or product categories.

  • Explore if environmental messaging on packaging significantly influences consumer preference when compared with other attributes like luxury perception or practicality.

  • Assess how important stacking capability is relative to other functional benefits in various contexts such as home storage versus travel convenience.

These hypotheses can guide further research into understanding deeper consumer motivations behind packaging preferences observed in this survey context.

AI themes (sample data)

Learn what respondents like and dislike about your poll based on sentiments analyzed by our AI.
A

Likes (sample data)

  • Sleek and modern design
  • Large ear cup sizes for comfort
  • Minimalist and streamlined look

Dislikes (sample data)

  • Lack of unique features or standout elements
  • White color may get dirty easily
  • Not as much cushioning as other options
B

Likes (sample data)

  • (Note: There were no positive mentions specific to Option B in the provided survey answers)

Dislikes (sample data)

  • (Note: There were no negative mentions specific to Option B in the provided survey answers)
C

Likes (sample data)

  • Unique and stylish metallic grating design
  • Sturdy and flexible build
  • 'Cool' aesthetic appeal

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'Weird' or unpleasant cone shape for earmuffs
  • 'Odd' overall appearance with metallic accents
  • (Note: Third negative mention not available from provided survey answers)
D

Likes (sample data)

  • Comfortable and sturdy design
  • Aesthetic appeal, including color options
  • Familiarity with the brand's quality

Dislikes (sample data)

  • Negative perception of the brand logo
  • Smaller ear size perceived as less comfortable
  • Design not preferred compared to others
E

Likes (sample data)

  • Sleek, modern, and professional look
  • Comfortable fit with larger ear sections that cup the ears well
  • Minimalist and clean black aesthetic

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'Flat' appearance perceived as less comfortable by some
  • 'Bulky' design disliked by a few respondents
  • Narrower piece near headband' not appealing to all users
F

Likes (sample data)

  • 'Cushiony padding' for comfort over long periods of use
  • 'Solid build' making it durable and secure on the head/ears
  • Preferred neutral colors like black for headphones

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'Large ear covering' may be too big for some users’ preferences
  • 'Separation of controls/buttons' not liked by everyone
  • 'Chrome accent rings on headband' not appealing to all respondents
G

Likes (sample data)

  • Design perceived as high quality and appealing
  • Liked the color, especially the blue
  • Thin padding was appreciated

Dislikes (sample data)

  • Looked flimsy to some respondents
  • Perceived as less sturdy compared to other options
  • Color preference for white or black over blue
H

Likes (sample data)

  • Modern and high-quality appearance with a white design
  • Comfortable padding on headband and ears
  • Sleek and neutral look preferred by many

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'White' color seen as prone to getting dirty easily
  • 'Large ear cups' might be problematic for glasses wearers over long periods of use
  • 'Sturdy design' could be considered bulky by some users