{"app_id":"fyv2a0qw"}

Open-ended

Poll complete
15 people answered in about 1 hour.
15 US-based respondents Frequent travelersFebruary 21, 2023Public
February 21, 2023Public

Q: 1. Which option you’d choose and why? 2. These special prices will often be available only on this website. To access them and save on flights, what subscription price per Year you’d find Acceptable, and which would be Outrageous?

Open-ended poll

AI Summary

.

This survey asked respondents to choose between two options for a flight and to provide their opinion on what subscription price they would find acceptable and outrageous. The majority of respondents chose the cheaper option, citing cost as the primary factor in their decision. Most respondents did not want to pay for a subscription, as they felt the best airfares should be available to everyone at no cost. Some respondents were not willing to use third-party travel sites due to past experiences with not being able to change reservations.

The majority of respondents felt that $50 a year would be an acceptable subscription price, while anything over $100 would be outrageous. Some respondents felt that the subscription was unnecessary and would not pay for it, while others felt that the subscription could be beneficial and would pay up to $100 a year.

Overall, the survey results showed that cost was the primary factor in respondents' decisions when it came to choosing a flight. Most respondents felt that a subscription price of $50 a year or less would be acceptable, while anything over $100 would be outrageous.

Ask PickFu

Ask natural language questions about your poll to our custom AI engine. Don’t worry, it’s friendly.

Log in as poll owner to use Ask PickFu.
Response flags
0
Keywords
6
6
5
4


Gender identity
5
9
1
Age range
2
9
3
1
Travel frequency
6
9
Responses15

I would find less than $50 a year acceptable and over $100 outrageous.

i would take the $700 flights. i can deal with 2 flights if it's just me and the wife. not sure that i would want to do that if we had kids though. with 2 of us i would rather spend an extra day in rome and have a nice dinner there and a night out with the guide. i think that 50 ayear would be fine for this service. it wouldn't make much sense if the site saved me money but cost as much to book it as i would actually save.

Two gives you more amenities and it’s a better flight option.

1. I would choose the third option because it is the cheapest and the highest rated flight out of the three options. 2. It depends on if the subscription is monthly or annual. I wouldn't pay more than $10/mo.

Firstly, this question is an abuse of Pickfu and garbage. If I have to explain - Feb 21 9:30Fly from Amsterdam (AMS)Feb 21 10:30Arrive in Rome (FCO)The above is my choice. I chose this because it is the cheapest. I do not want any amenities nor do I care, just something cheap. The rest I would manage myself. I would never subscribe, and if I had to, only $5 a month would be acceptable, therefore $60 maximum in a year.

I would go with the 700 dollar package because it offers more.

1. i would take the direct flight because i hate transfering 2. i would pay 50 dolalrs and would consider over 100 to be outrageous

The 700 dollar subscription is the one that I would choose. The options associated with that option would suit me just fine. The 1000 dollar option is just way too much and it is not something that I would ever even consider.

I do not use third party travel sites to book travel because of past experiences in not being able to change reservations.

I would pick the seven hundred dollar option that includes the night stay in Rome because I would like to take the time to experience Rome and visit its sites. I think that a yearly subscription price for this flight site should be no more than sixty dollars or five dollars per month. I would find sixty dollars per year to be acceptable and one hundred dollars or more to be outrageous for this service.

I would choose the 20% cheaper option with private pickup, city tour, Italian dinner and transfer back to the airport. I would find my own hotel thenFor prices I would say I would pay up to $100 a year for this - anything over would be too expensive

Since i do not travel that often, i find the whole subscription-based idea usrless to me, and would not spend my money kn it.

I would go from DCA to BCN because I live in DC but want to go to Barcelona. I think that this is a great service and I would consider subscribing. I think I would subscribe for $100 a year. I think $1000 a year would be absolutely ridiculous.

I received only two options on the page. I'd choose the $700 flight that routes through Rome since this is the cheapest flight. I'd pay $150 per year for this and 200+ would be outrageous to me.

I chose the cheapest option because it was cheapest. I would not pay to subscribe to this because the best airfares should be open to everyone at no cost.

Subscribe to PickFu+ to unlock AI highlights on every poll.

Or, unlock AI features for this poll as a one-time $29 add-on.

AI analysis (sample data)

Unearth more insights with a detailed poll report, discovering what respondents liked, disliked, and what to do next.

Survey Analysis

Winning Option: Characteristics and Appeal

  • Option B emerged as the preferred brand packaging design, securing 12 out of 15 votes. Respondents frequently highlighted its aesthetic appeal, emphasizing the luxurious and high-quality impression it conveys. The ability to stack packages was a notable practical advantage mentioned by participants.
  • Several respondents appreciated the monochrome color scheme of Option B, which they found less overwhelming compared to more colorful designs. This preference for simplicity suggests that minimalistic designs may resonate well with this group.
  • Additionally, environmental considerations played a role in favoring Option B; some participants noted its reduced plastic usage and recyclability as attractive features.

Key Topics Across Options

  1. Aesthetic Appeal: Across both options, aesthetics were crucial in influencing preferences. Participants often referred to colors and overall design quality when justifying their choices.

  2. Environmental Concerns: Both options had respondents who valued environmentally friendly aspects of packaging. However, while Option A was praised for being reusable and eco-friendly by some, others perceived Option B’s reduced plastic use as more sustainable.

  3. Practicality: Practical elements such as ease of stacking (Option B) or suitability for travel (Option B) were significant factors in decision-making processes.

Hypotheses for Further Testing

  • Investigate whether minimalistic designs consistently outperform colorful ones across different demographic groups or product categories.

  • Explore if environmental messaging on packaging significantly influences consumer preference when compared with other attributes like luxury perception or practicality.

  • Assess how important stacking capability is relative to other functional benefits in various contexts such as home storage versus travel convenience.

These hypotheses can guide further research into understanding deeper consumer motivations behind packaging preferences observed in this survey context.

AI themes (sample data)

Learn what respondents like and dislike about your poll based on sentiments analyzed by our AI.
A

Likes (sample data)

  • Sleek and modern design
  • Large ear cup sizes for comfort
  • Minimalist and streamlined look

Dislikes (sample data)

  • Lack of unique features or standout elements
  • White color may get dirty easily
  • Not as much cushioning as other options
B

Likes (sample data)

  • (Note: There were no positive mentions specific to Option B in the provided survey answers)

Dislikes (sample data)

  • (Note: There were no negative mentions specific to Option B in the provided survey answers)
C

Likes (sample data)

  • Unique and stylish metallic grating design
  • Sturdy and flexible build
  • 'Cool' aesthetic appeal

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'Weird' or unpleasant cone shape for earmuffs
  • 'Odd' overall appearance with metallic accents
  • (Note: Third negative mention not available from provided survey answers)
D

Likes (sample data)

  • Comfortable and sturdy design
  • Aesthetic appeal, including color options
  • Familiarity with the brand's quality

Dislikes (sample data)

  • Negative perception of the brand logo
  • Smaller ear size perceived as less comfortable
  • Design not preferred compared to others
E

Likes (sample data)

  • Sleek, modern, and professional look
  • Comfortable fit with larger ear sections that cup the ears well
  • Minimalist and clean black aesthetic

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'Flat' appearance perceived as less comfortable by some
  • 'Bulky' design disliked by a few respondents
  • Narrower piece near headband' not appealing to all users
F

Likes (sample data)

  • 'Cushiony padding' for comfort over long periods of use
  • 'Solid build' making it durable and secure on the head/ears
  • Preferred neutral colors like black for headphones

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'Large ear covering' may be too big for some users’ preferences
  • 'Separation of controls/buttons' not liked by everyone
  • 'Chrome accent rings on headband' not appealing to all respondents
G

Likes (sample data)

  • Design perceived as high quality and appealing
  • Liked the color, especially the blue
  • Thin padding was appreciated

Dislikes (sample data)

  • Looked flimsy to some respondents
  • Perceived as less sturdy compared to other options
  • Color preference for white or black over blue
H

Likes (sample data)

  • Modern and high-quality appearance with a white design
  • Comfortable padding on headband and ears
  • Sleek and neutral look preferred by many

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'White' color seen as prone to getting dirty easily
  • 'Large ear cups' might be problematic for glasses wearers over long periods of use
  • 'Sturdy design' could be considered bulky by some users