Poll results

Save to favorites
Add this poll to your saved list for easy reference.
Please rate our ideas for improving the product and comment on your choice. We will also be glad to hear your suggestions for improvement
Option A won this Ranked poll with a final tally of 29 votes after 2 rounds of votes counting.
In a Ranked poll, respondents rank every option in order of preference. For example, when you test 6 options, each respondent orders their choices from first to sixth place.
PickFu requires a majority to win a Ranked poll. A majority winner differs from a plurality winner. A majority winner earns over 50% of the votes, whereas a plurality winner earns the most votes, regardless of winning percentage.
If an option does not earn a majority of votes, PickFu eliminates the option with the lowest number of votes. The votes from the eliminated option are reassigned based on each respondent’s next choice. This process continues in rounds until a majority winner emerges.
Scores reflect the percentage of total votes an option receives during the vote counting and indicate the relative preference of the respondents. If there is no majority winner, look to the scores to see how the options fared relative to one another.
Option | Round 1 | Round 2 |
---|---|---|
A | 48% 24 votes | 58% 29 votes +5 |
C | 30% 15 votes | 42% 21 votes +6 |
B | 22% 11 votes | Eliminated 11 votes reassigned |
24 Responses to Option A
I prefer the idea in option A so that the product is adjustable. I think this is a functional and useful upgrade for this type of product. My next favorite idea is option C and it would be visually appealing to have the vinyl playing illuminated. I would be least interested in the idea for option B because it doesn't seem as interesting.
I like the expandable nature of A, and the description fits the product well
The expandable features of both Choices A and C would be of the most interest, as different consumers have different size collections when it comes to vinyl records. Personally, the illumination feature doesn't matter to me as I doubt I would use it.
I sell a lot of records on ebay. like 20 a day. I think my customers would prefer A.
The adjustable design is appealing. Great for ever-expanding record collections which is inevitable. The light isn't really appealing because it's attached to the holder. A small, one record holder with a light for now playing is much more flexible.
extends and improves what is the primary function, holding more records
A is the best because it shows how it works and can expand. I like this product.
My first choice is option A. I like that it extends and adjust to the size that you need, and I like option A better than option C, because I have no use for the light accessories that comes in option C. Option B is not a bad choice, but not my preferred since I wouldn't know what to do with the extra small accessories compartment. I rather keep it nice and simple and go with option A.
I dont think the illuminating light brings much to the product. all of these units look large and I am not sure where I would put them. I believe I would prefer a boxed design.
I like the adjustable aspect of A
Calling it 'adjustable' in option A makes it instantly easy to understand what it is and how I'd use it. I like option C for showing how it lights up the record. For B, I don't think it's necessary to have small storage included.
I can see how it expands very clear. The product looks sturdy and I can imagine my collection on it. The words of the side are clear. I can see the quality of the woodgrain
B is too bulky. C is too light. A is just right
Top choice is adjustable and would be able to handle a larger volume of growing LP collection
Option "A": The design adjustability is shown well in this presentation and is a feaure that is important to me as a buyer.
This is pretty great description and makes me want to know the product more it's something I have even thought about buying myself so there is a need for it in the community.
I think A is better. I don’t need the light feature and B does not look sturdy to me
I ordered in the order that that ad and text in the ad appealed to me.
Seeing and promoting the products expansion capacity is the most key feature of the product.
Overall, it's hard to tell how this holds the vinyl records in place. Is there a stand? Second, it doesn't look very sturdy. I'd almost prefer to have a slight lip/dip which keeps the records more secure, going all around the outer border
I chose option A first because I like the description of this product the best. I think option A description is the most professional of them. I chose option C last because the description of this does not make sense to me.
The picture of option A and C are useful, it shows a feature ( expandable). The language in C is hard to understand, so I chose A which was more easy to grasp. I found option B least appealing because it is not unique and picture didnt hold any small accessories.
Choice A has the most clear caption, followed by Choice B. Choice C is an awkward phrase.
I feel like simpler is better with this product. I don't see that the improvements of a light or a drawer add that much to the product. Either you want to buy something like this or you don't.
11 Responses to Option B
I chose option B. I actually have an illuminated not playing stand (not like this) and I never turn it on because it doesn't look as good. I like the o e that has a compartment. I don't know what I'd really use it for, but I think it looks great overall. I'd try any of these, I'm currently creating a vinyl setup so I think these are nice.
I will choose choice b because I find it to be compact and more visually attractive to me, the others are longer and do not look that strong and long-lasting,
I would prefer option B. I think having an option with different colored wood like black or white would be great.
Option B is the best because it is simple but has an extra storage compartment. As far as improvements go, I would suggest offering different colors.
I always like storage space. The little drawer would be good for holding spare needles or a little bottle of record cleaner. I put the one with the light last because it's kind of silly and gimmicky in my opinion.
I like design B the most. I find the adjustable slider concerning for holding vinyl as the stretched out parts are smaller and might put pressure on the cover causing damage. This makes B the most appealing as it's a solid piece of wood.
needs more support on the back, you risk scratching the cover. also you can't really read the spine which is how you should sort albums at home
B has the best looking build. A is good but a little worse. C looks mediocre.
I think they all look exactly the same and it was pretty hard to tell the difference between the three products the one that stood out the most to me was my first choice I like that it has a small compartment for small little items hidden away out of view my second choice I liked that it illuminated and made the vinyl stand out the final choice was just basic and nothing exciting about it
All of these are pretty comparable to each other. It's a little weird that they are all mirrored backwards though.
I chose B because it is consistent. I don't like the other two options because they get narrower in the middle.
15 Responses to Option C
I like the illumination for the currently playing album, just please include the dimensions and how many records it can hold.
I chose the most unique and creative options first and I think the illumination idea is very cool.
I think C is very cool, especially for DJs and audiophiles to showcase what they are currently playing or love most. It is great particularly in places like dark nightclubs where people might be interested in seeing what's playing but can't because of the lack of light. B is nice to have to put anything like a replacement needle for your record or a dusting wipe. A is nice looking but doesn't have the extra features of the first two.
I think the best version would be to include all three elements into one design to make it the best product it can be
I really like the design of option C. I like how it is adjustable and I can display what I am currently listening to. I would like to see the product in other finishes though.
C is great looks warm. A is ok. B is sterile and is in shadows on part of it
Not into the storage compartment but I love the illumination bar on the LP!
I actually really think the illumination is really awesome and unique. I have never seen that before, as someone who does collect vinyl. Otherwise, if that were not an option, the adjustable holder would be handy.
All 3 are solid and good looking Lp holder, will it fit on a normal sound center? Also it needs a stopper to hold the lps upright so they dont slide down I picked option C because I liked the now playing but as I said all 3 are about the same.
I own thousands or records and so this product is not super practical for me, I like the illumination on C.
The illuminating feature is the most attractive here, with adjustability coming in second. Both are the hallmarks of a great product.
I chose the illuminated holder first because I think that its a cool feature to have when listening to vinyls. I chose the adjustable one second because I could fit more vinyls in it. I chose the holder with the compartment last because I wouldn't use it.
I like being able to present the record with a light on C, option B had some good storage and option A just was a holder with nothing extra.
My first choice was because i love lights and things that light up as well as albums, my second choice was because the album holder would still be helpful without the lighting but cheaper and my third choice was last because i dont have a need for the storage compartment.
I like the way you can showcase your favorite in C & A.
Explore who answered your poll
Analyze your results with demographic reports.