I like that it doesn't overpower what the words are saying

All logos looked very similar. I picked based upon looks and color. And what looked more professional.

according to my opinion i choose this order

I like this logo because of the way it stands out.

I prefer the logos from best to worst in that particular order

When I look at the logo in B, I see TeamFG supporting the center of the group of dots to make it stand strong.

i LIKE OPTION b THE best. This logo stands out

Choice C Seems like too much with the design. Choice B seems perfect as it complements the Team FG

I think the logo that appears half finished reminds me more of building, completion.

the more condense look is easier to read

The partially connected dots make the most sense.

The full circle is too much, just half is sufficient or even 3

I like half the flower better

I think that these have the best balance

They all look so really nice

made my choices based on what looks best

the logo next to team is more unidirectional and shows more of a full team approach versus only a portion of the team

The more dots connecting, the better if that is the message you want to convey.

I like these designs best in this order.

I like logo C better, it looks complete.

A full circle would help the reader with the connect the dots logo.

I chose the logo that had the most dots connected in that order. If the company is connecting the dots for building a brand the first logo makes more sense to me because the dots are connected to "build" a flower. The logo in a way gives you an indication of what they do or makes the most sense when you find out what the company really does, in my opinion.

I like the all around image. Then the second closest to all around. The more of an image the better.

Looking at it, the incomplete versions in B and A seem off. I like the whole dot matrix in option C the most. Makes the most sense as well.

C really shows the dots and how the entire picture is connected. A is like the beginning of something. B is like something broke halfway through. I don't like it.

I LIKE HOW c HAS THE LOGO AS A FULL CIRCLE, IT MAKES THE MOST SENSE

I chose C because I like the completed "flower." To me, it shows you connecting all the dots. The other two look unfinished to me.

I think this image represents end to end brand solution the best. The more full the image looks I think it is more appealing to connecting the dots for a brand.

I LIKE THAT C HAS THE LIGHT BLUE DOT IN THE MIDDLE AND HAS THE BLUE COMING OUT.

I like the full design of the logo without it being cut in half

The more dots that are connected in the logo, the more resourceful and useful the company appears. It subtlety lets people know how well connected they are.

C shows the whole sybols abd seem sm ore complete; B is ok but loolks weird not having the whole deseign; #3 looks like a shot put to the symbol and makes me think its for a badmitton game

The first choice looks complete like it is all inclusive based on the design (flower). The second choice appears partially inclusive based on this same design and the last choice seems less inclusive based on this same design as it barely connects the dots like the ad says they do.

I like the logos that are full dots or less dots the most.

The full flower is best for connections the dots

I made my choices according to how well the hand-like figure in the images portrays the idea of "connecting the dots."

I have to go with C first because it signals an inclusive atmosphere. It indicates to me that everything will be connected. The other two are OK, but they seem...incomplete at best.

The symbol on the left hand side seems more appropriate and complete which would maybe make me think this company is complete and accurate.

I PREFER C, WITH THE DESIGN COMPLETED

Option C's graphic part of the logo looks better because of the full symmetry and the fact there are eight dots connected to the hub, representing to me that this company could incorporate a multitude of things into a brand. Option B was next because it looks not as weird as Option A in the layout and amount of the dots connected to the hub of the graphic.

I chose logo B" because it's the boldest of the three. The logo "B" and "C" show a lesser degree of illustration and "A". I always say that more is better in commercial advertising.

The more connections there are, the better and more fitting. Choice C has the full spectrum of connections.

They are all very similar. The logo is C looks the best. In B and A, the logo looks like it is missing something

I feel C is the most complete graphic and fits with the idea.

I prefer option C the most because the logo looks completed. Options A and B look incomplete and unprofessional.

Option C is the best, because if this company is about connecting the dots the logo shows all the dots connected. Best option in my opinion.

I chose option C as my favorite option because it makes the most sense that all of the dots are connected. The logo is the most captivating. I chose B and A second and third, by their respect number of dots in the logo.

Even though I think C looks somewhat like a flower, which had me thinking I should not select it, I think that having things connected from one side all the way to the other is important. It makes it appear to connect everything instead of just a few. Likewise A second because it includes more connections.

I like the symmetry of Option C, B is also pleasant on the eyes - both seem professional and a good logo for "connecting dots". Option a feels unfinished.

The bigger logo makes it seem more connected