I prefer the pricing for this product, the description is adequate

I prefer A because the text is in regular lettering and does not feel like a scam. It is easy to read and the price of $224 seems very reasonable to me. I realize it does not last as long or cover as much as the other option but for me personally, I think it is a better deal since I don't believe the claims often made my products.

I like option A because it has more detail

The lower price caught my eye right away because there was no distracting capital headlines

The price is roughly 20 dollars less and has a breathable non yellowing solvent based product right in the first sentence. The other product pushes that it's worth more because of the wet look and low gloss quality of the paint.

This product is less expensive. I would not pay more for option B.

I chose option A as I personally do not like a glossy finish to most things. I'm not really into shine, I would prefer matte, especially if it's on an outdoor surface that is going to be reflecting.

A is cheaper and equally as intriguing.

i like this description better

I like wet low gloss in Caps

This one is easier to read and see the main points. But I wouldn't be willing to pay more.

I would pay more since it covers more

The features seem better in B, especially being solvent free. I'm concerned about the extra cost though.

Though I do not like the ALL CAPS, there seems to be better descriptions of each benefit and more of them.

this one is more informative and the better lok

B is a better value with the coverage and life of product both being about twice as much as the other option. The mention of it being eco-conscious is also a plus.

I go for the lower price item usually.

this one looks the better choice for sure

I prefer the way B is set up, with the featured categories in caps, so you can see at quick glance the features, also I would probably pay more since it covers more square feet and has a longer life up to 5 years.

The environmental benefits are enough for me to pay extra.

I like how with B it's clear and quick to see its specifications. You don't have to read a lot to get an idea of what the product has to offer

I like B as it has headers for each important subject in regards to the paver sealing products. So much easier to read and get the highlights.

Yes, I will pay more option B as it seems to have more good properties when compared to A

The coverage rate of Choice B is double that of Choice A, for only $41 more-- nowhere near double the price. Plus, choice B mentions preventing mold and mildew and having low slip potential, which Choice A doesn't have. Plus, it's just easier to quickly read Choice B's benefits because they are highlighted with all-caps.

It restores faded colors and that was all I needed to know about this product. I am willing to pay more for this one.

although choice B is a bit more money, descriptions or more sufficient and have better attention grabbing headlines.

I like B better because it is clearer what you are getting. A little pricier but well worth it, if you ask me.

I like how B has a heading for each section that highlights each benefit. easier to read and process.

I'm very sensitive to paint fumes so I would probably choose this one even though it is more expensive. Sometimes these claims are not entirely true so I would be extremely upset if it had a strong odor.

Option B has longer lasting effect and goes further. The product description is more convincing that it is a quality product.

I chose B because I like that the description was broken into different sections. That made it a lot easier to read and digest. It is also written in a more persuasive tone in my opinion. I would definitely choose B if I were given the choice between buying these products.

I like the way the product is described. The uppercase description better depicts what the product does. It is easier to read.

you get more for your money and it lasts longer

I like that option B shows you a more detailed description of what is under each header. It clearly shows what to expect and what it should do under each capitalized heading, making it easier to read and understand and take in.

I think the all caps at the start of each point makes it easier to read the points at a glance

Option B covers twice as much area and is only $41 more. It also lasts longer, 5 years vs 1-3 years.

I like the strong titles for each section. If I needed to know about a specific part of it, I can easily find the section with the information.

Option B due to the coverage is twice of option A as well as the length of time between recoating. Also, not having a strong odor while applying is appealing.

I'd much rather purchase B knowing that I can breathe easy while applying it and that it covers more area than option A is also a very appealing benefit.

Option B has twice the coverage of option A, so it seems like a better value. The description is also much more vivid and interesting.

I would pay more because I am actually getting more for my money. The small increase in price is made up for by the larger coverage area.

I would choose B. I like the bolder words and how it is much easier to read. I also like that coverage is better. I would give more for B.

I PREFERED B, I LIKE THE CAPITAL LETTERS NEAR THE BULLET POINTS. IT MAKES IT MORE APPEALING. I WOULD BE WILLING TO PAY MORE

Option B makes me want to buy the product more because it states the benefits outright and explains them after the fact so that I can choose what benefits I want to learn more about rather than having to search from the text to find what I am looking for. I would also choose option B because it has twice as much coverage for less than $50 more

Option B seems to be far more convincing of the ability and features of the product. It highlights the features with the large text at each bullet point and elaborates upon it.

I would choose option B and yes I would pay more. I want as much coverage as possible.

I like the way the description lays out each reason you would want to buy this and it makes it clear when you're on to a new point. Seems to be a better value for the money as well.solvent free is also a big deal and the fact that it doesn't have a strong odor. I would pay more for B because it can cover a larger area and that's always a concern with projects like this.

Choice B isn't that much more expensive but it seems higher in quality and durability and lasts longer. So in the end, it's probably worth the little bit of extra money.

The descriptions for option B has a better appearance and sound to it. It might cost a little more than A, but it covers twice the area so the cost would be lower in the long run.

I prefer the wording on Option B. There are a few reasons that I would purchase it even though it is more expensive. 1) It can last up to 5 years before resealing 2) Protects from stains, mold, and mildew 3) It has UV protection 4) Solvent free so it is more safe for the environment. I think it would be worth the cost difference to purchase Option B.