It is shorter and more concise

I like the emphasis on easy

Simple, succinct, easier to read. B goes on for too long.

It immediately describes why this product is different from similar ones out in the market. It is understandable and it says it right away, the device is simple.

I like the sounds of this one the most.

this one gets straight to the point and and more easier to read and understand

This one makes sense from the beginning to the end. I feel like I completely understand what I read on this one.

I LIKE THE FLOW OF OPTION A BETTER

I like the more concise version in choice A. It captures all the main points and is better than selling it on the very specific features of the cooker. The cooker is nice but I think the additional details such as delaying the cook cycle seem to be too detailed for some customers and should be in a footnote area.

This is more appealing to look at

Less text and more capitals letters highlight the important points better

I prefer the more straightforward writing style. I am less likely to skip a shorter block of text than a longer blob of words.

get sucked in right away with first sentence

I like being told the device is easy to use right away.

I like the wording of this one.

It is clearer and more easily understandable

I like that the title poses and answers the question in the first breath without you having to read all the way through the description. Also, option A is simple to read through and shorter and more concise.

Sous Vide is pretty intimidating but this description makes it more approachable.

Ease of use is very important to me. I want something that is intuitive and does not require difficult to understand steps.

I like the description of this one the best

Choice A focuses on simplicity. Choice B led off with the delay start feature, which I don't want. I would be nervous about using a sous vide device, so I would never set a timer for it.

I picked A because I like how they included the statement about being simple in the opening lines. I think the other option was too long. I also don't like how it used the word buggy - I never want to think about bugs when cooking. I know the meanings are different but still wouldn't use that word.

I prefer this option because it immediately states that there is no wifi or internet connectivity needed. It is ready to go ad functional right out of the box.

Sounds a little less pretentious. Plus most will not know what a sous vide cooker is so not including it in the first line is smart./

there is a clear statement that simplicity is a differentiating factor

I picked this option because it sounds like a better quality product than the other option, and it appealed to me more than the other option as well.

This definitely sounds more like a successful product ad to me. I think it's more positive focused.

I like how B focuses a lot more on how this product is better than others rather than why other products are bad.

I have a better understanding about what the device does in this description.

I prefer learn about what exactly makes the product different than others like it, both do that but this one is more specific.

In my opinion Option B seems to expand on the features of the device, whereas Option A sounds a bit more casual, like you were talking to a friend about it. I'd rather read a little more explanation on things like this.

This makes the benefits of this particular product much more clear and desirable.

I think highlighting the delay start timer is good because it's a different feature that people may find useful.

I feel although this one is wordy - it explains the product in a way that encourages the consumer to visually think about the product.

The wording is much better in option B. It's much easier to understand and read.

I pick option B because the description is trying to tell us how their product is different than others. In option B, it clearly goes straight to the point saying what their sous vide cooker does that no other cooker does.

It just reads better. I don't know how to describe it but the other one just doesn't flow very well.

This is easier to read.

i think this one gets to the point much faster

this one made more sense

This one just sounds more inviting

it explains how to use the delay and why it is better than wifi or bluetooth

Option B focuses on describing what functions the cooker has while Option A describes what the cooker does not do or depend on.Option B gives more useful,practical and positive description of the product.

Option B sounds more appealing and attention grabbing.

It explains how the cooker is different with it's delay start timer. This is really the thing that makes it different. Not needing WiFi, etc. isn't really the selling point, in my opinion.

B is more convincing and detailed

Choice B actually talks about how the sous vide cooker actually works with the delay start timer. This choice actually makes more sense than option A that just talks about how good the company thinks their sous vide cooker works.

B sounds more appealing.

I think this description is easier to comprehend and paints a better picture of the product and its use.

I chose option B because I like how the point is made that the machine is different from the others within the market. I like how an important feature "delay start timer" was included. This highlights how the machine function with time constraints. The description is option B details the product feature better in my opinion; however, there are statements that I like in option A as well. I like the statement "OUR DEVICE IS SIMPLE" and how it functions right out the box. Simplicity is also an important feature; however, for a specific feature I found Option B to better describe.