A has more product information

For option A, the feet are in a nice, attractive position. I think option C does not look natural, and option B looks too generic, and basic.

They all show a lot 1 and 2 had a lot of info

I like seeing feet straight on and not from the back

I chose "A" because I think it gives me the most information about the product. The images are larger and easier to understand. That should always be the purpose in the advertisements, in my opinion.

A and B are much better and show the tops of the feet which looks more normal than the picture of the bottom of that person's feet.

I like the image with the bigger poster cause it allows me to better see the different types of excercises to do

I actually chose based off how comfortable the feet look. I'm unaware of what this product is, but I'm confident that Option A would have my sale.

I like the positioning of the feet in my top pick, plus the badge that says PT recommends this product. I'm not sure what the trade show badge means and I think seeing the bottom of someones feet is gross.

I like the way the feet look comfortable in A and B. In C the product doesn't look good because the feet are so awkward as if the mat was painful to stand on.

Sexy legs make it more attractive

A provides a more up close view of the background pictorial area. This help me assess its function and make my buying decisions faster. B provides a well organized and logical view of the item features and the feet on the unit which is respectable and helps me assess function by reading it according to a side to side motion. C is too revealing by showing bottom of feet, that is not needed.

The layout is clear and I can see all the information easily in this photo.

A - ouch, not sure any one of these would convince me. Those things remind me of a bed of nails. They might look like they are not sharp, but how is that going to feel when one's full weight pressure is on them? But since I'm to make a choice here, then A because the feet are moving and using the product. This probably feels good on sore feet and offers some foot massage which would be nice if it can be tolerated. C comes next with the attractive leg pose and I don't like B because the person is just standing there.

A little bit of a sexy pose would always get my attention in advertising.

The poster with the exercises is easier to see. This may appeal to more people. Option C seems better than Option B because the leg is not hidden by the photo.

I think the side view with the 2 in 1 picture is the one that sells it the most to me. Out of the other two the one with the feet in more of a balancing stance makes it seem like there is more movement and that it is something to use as part of a workout.

I like the photos that show the product bearing weight. It gives me info on how the product functions

I love that A shows it's 2 in 1 so it makes me feel like I'm getting a great deal. I like C because it shows a new angle and that it really helps bottom of your feet - which most products neglect. I don't like B because it's a boring photo.

A is by far and just a more attractive picture

I picked a display of the product that seems the most natural and commonly used method of demonstration.

Option B is the most appealing image of the three that would make me want to buy the product.

Option b seems to show the product the way I would use it which is a more useful image.

The position of the feet in B looks most appropriate for the product.

Feet are not attractive, even in the best of pictures. I chose in order of not so intrusive feet pictures.

B is the most straight forward of all and allows me to visualize the product the best

Option B is the best photo. It concentrates on the product the most. The foot pattern seems unnecessary. I would go with that as the best product here.

Look Best in that particular order. Starting with the one I chose first

I feel B looks most realistic (2 feet panted) with the close up of the nubs makes me want to click this over the others.

The displays are easy to understand.

I like Option A because the design seems professional and I like how the feet are facing forward. Option A and C are also good in terms of design but I don't like how the feet are faced. It looks awkward and doesn't appeal to me much at all. As a result, I think that Option B is still the best option out of the three.

I like this one because it has a lot of information.

My first choice shows an up close picture of the product and is in the forefront to give me a beeter idea of what the product looks like.

It is a balance may and the picture in option B shows her just standing on it with both feet flat which is what you are suppose to do at first. It is not going to do anything but be a mat. I like the back of the feet shot in option C because it show her balancing a little and where two pressure points are. Option A is weird and showings front of her feet looks just like someone getting out of the shower. I don't know if any of these would make me buy this product. I think option B is the best out of these 3 but not that influential.

I prefer to see the front of the feet. I like seeing a close up view of the top of the mat.

I think B is the most visually appealing and A describes what it is the best.

I guess since it's a balance mat, it would make the most sense to see it being used with 2 flat feet.

B has the best view of the product, but C offers some good information in the photo

I prefer the images that have the larger zoomed in picture of the product so you can see the details more clearly.

(B) I like that this photo shows me a person putting their full weight on the mat and the informational picture at top lets me know how I could use the product. (C) This one shows me a different angle of the product in use to give me an impression of how it works. The picture at the top is useful as well. (A) The way the person is standing seems to be dainty and very light-footed making me question the durability of the product.

Looks the most natural and normal.

i prefer the angels where the feet are doing a pose

Prefer the top down view of the nubs

This one had to do with something about how the pictures made me imagine my feet feeling on the product. They go in order from most comfortable.

The crossed feet are more interesting and noticeable.

They seem more descriptive and easy to understand.

I think Option C makes more sense for the product being offered. It is the picture that looks both athletic and balanced. Option B is feels awkward to look at, it's not a great pose. Option A isn't terrible but it looks extremely feminine and doesn't give me a feel for the product.

nubs sounds really weird

Chosen in order of which stimulates my foot fetish most.

Option C's view shows that they don't leave indentations in your feet which would be my first question before buying