App icon test marketing poll

50 Respondents General Population

This is a completed app icon test marketing poll published on May 16, 2017.

The mobile app developer received 50 unbiased responses (votes & explanations) from the general population in about about 2 hours.

Using PickFu, mobile app developers are able to test app icons and screens before launching, utilizing one of the cheapest and fastest app store optimization tools available.

Create Your Own App Icon Test Marketing Poll 

Hi there, here is a brand new future themed war game, the background is the AI trying to demolish the human race and rule the world, while humans are about to strike back. Please help us by choosing the game icon that you prefer for the game, thanks!

Option A

7a8a32e83e51ed6d66ba5becec209d1b1674b932


31/50 votes

Full Poll Results

Published May 16, 2017
Public

Hi there, here is a brand new future themed war game, the background is the AI trying to demolish the human race and rule the world, while humans are about to strike back. Please help us by choosing the game icon that you prefer for the game, thanks!

50 Respondents General Population

Option A

7a8a32e83e51ed6d66ba5becec209d1b1674b932


31 votes
Option B

4253f27e1e7dcd157ba314a2f95aad7cdb0e4d79


19 votes

Responses

Responses to Option A
1
it shows more of the head
2
It looks more slick and less in your face.
3
I don't need to see it as close up as it is in option B.
4
I like the smaller head/face for the icon.
5
Looks more like an icon, not a zoomed in poster
6
I like to be able to see the whole head. It gives you a better idea of what the character looks like.
7
I like being able to see the whole head.
8
I like the background more than I like the face.
9
I prefer the smaller face and the more colorful background
10
Like how the head overlaps the border
11
Seems more 3d
12
I like the slightly smaller face.
13
I feel like it is framed much better
14
Choice A seems more approachable. The other choice has the character right up in your face and I find that annoying.
15
I think the outline makes it looked more polished/finished.
16
I like it less zoomed in
17
I like the location of the bright white light by the left ear.
18
Icon appears has more depth and 3D feel with the character popping out of frame,
19
A is cleaner and more dimensional.
20
I prefer the border. Without it, the face is more intimidating.
21
The way the face pops out beyond the frame shows more action. It's like the character is coming to get you!
22
A looks a little further away, and that makes it seem more menacing!
23
Easier to see background with smaller face
24
this one has better balance
25
I prefer A because it seems more balanced than the other choice. It doesn't seem as intrusive.
26
Other image is way too close up
27
A looks normal, B is offputting with how close the face is, so I went with A
28
I like the smaller face and beveled edge.
29
I liked A because of the silver border. It complements the robot in the photo.
30
The depiction of the figure's entire head is more eye-catching and interesting than the cropped version.
31
The option A seems more eye catching.
Responses to Option B
1
Option B looks more friendly.
2
I like it better then a
3
b is better because of the closer shot.
4
B just really strikes my interest
5
I don't think that the border is necessary.
6
bigger is scarier.
7
I like the cclose up version better
8
I like the detail slightly more.
9
B is cleaner design and better.
10
I like the zoomed view better.
11
The icon is more menacing when it is larger.
12
The picture drew my attention it seems to be more eye capturing
13
It's better to have the face more zoomed in upon
14
B looks more upclose and clearer to me than A.
15
The image being much more upclose makes it scarier
16
much warmer colors and finer contrast.
17
I prefer this close-up look. It is more striking and eye-catching.
18
I like it better without the border and a closer view of the character's face.
19
Much more intimidating

Demographics

Gender
Male (0%)
TraitPercentage
Male (0%)0
Female (0%)0
Age
3-17 (0%)
TraitPercentage
3-17 (0%)0
18-34 (0%)0
35-49 (0%)0
50-64 (0%)0
65+ (0%)0
Income
$0-30k (0%)
TraitPercentage
$0-30k (0%)0
$30-60k (0%)0
$60-100k (0%)0
$100k+ (0%)0
Ethnicity
White (0%)
TraitPercentage
White (0%)0
Black (0%)0
Asian (0%)0
Hispanic (0%)0
Other (0%)0
Education
High School (0%)
TraitPercentage
High School (0%)0
College (0%)0
Grad School (0%)0
Gender for Option A
Male (0%)
TraitPercentage
Male (0%)0
Female (0%)0
Gender for Option B
Male (0%)
TraitPercentage
Male (0%)0
Female (0%)0
Age for Option A
3-17 (0%)
TraitPercentage
3-17 (0%)0
18-34 (0%)0
35-49 (0%)0
50-64 (0%)0
65+ (0%)0
Age for Option B
3-17 (0%)
TraitPercentage
3-17 (0%)0
18-34 (0%)0
35-49 (0%)0
50-64 (0%)0
65+ (0%)0
Income for Option A
$0-30k (0%)
TraitPercentage
$0-30k (0%)0
$30-60k (0%)0
$60-100k (0%)0
$100k+ (0%)0
Income for Option B
$0-30k (0%)
TraitPercentage
$0-30k (0%)0
$30-60k (0%)0
$60-100k (0%)0
$100k+ (0%)0
Ethnicity for Option A
White (0%)
TraitPercentage
White (0%)0
Black (0%)0
Asian (0%)0
Hispanic (0%)0
Other (0%)0
Ethnicity for Option B
White (0%)
TraitPercentage
White (0%)0
Black (0%)0
Asian (0%)0
Hispanic (0%)0
Other (0%)0
Education for Option A
High School (0%)
TraitPercentage
High School (0%)0
College (0%)0
Grad School (0%)0
Education for Option B
High School (0%)
TraitPercentage
High School (0%)0
College (0%)0
Grad School (0%)0

A

Votes by demographic segment

B


Gender
50%
Male (20)
50%
70%
Female (30)
30%

Age
-
3-17 (None)
-
42%
18-34 (19)
57%
73%
35-49 (19)
26%
75%
50-64 (12)
25%
-
65+ (None)
-

Income
37%
$0-30k (8)
62%
58%
$30-60k (17)
41%
78%
$60-100k (14)
21%
63%
$100k+ (11)
36%

Ethnicity
60%
White (46)
39%
100%
Black (1)
0%
100%
Asian (1)
0%
50%
Hispanic (2)
50%
-
Other (None)
-

Education
40%
High School (10)
60%
60%
College (30)
40%
90%
Grad School (10)
10%
Loading