The one I chose makes more sense. The other choice sounds like the support black woman for being disrupting and unethical. I was confused at first when I read it.

If you read B the wrong way, it seems like women of color are the ones making disrupting, unethical tech. Option A is very clear about its mission statement

Option A is more streamlined. B is too wordy.

Choice A had better wording

It's shorter and straight to the point. Using the word "connect" early in the sentence makes the reader feel more involved.

Striving seems like a more powerful connection tool

It was more concise and understandable. The other option, B, was too wordy and 'We support women of color with disrupting unethical tech...' was misleading.

because its strait to the point

shorter and straight to the point

That statement sounds better and well written and said

A is better than B

It is well crafted. It sounds ideal or better

Is more condensed and to the point

Is hateful but short. A smooth read although I don't agree with it.

I think making a connecting is so much more better than saying support. We can do it ourselves giving supporting each other that are like minded.

I really don't think any of these promote any of sort of good for society. Quit dividing.

These are both a bit over the top. That being said less is more. Short and to the point is why I chose A.

it was a short one sentence that was straight to the point

I chose A because the word "empowered" feels like a buzz word at this point. I've worked with companies (not specifically aimed at non pink women) that supposedly said workers were "empowered" but it was anything but.

Option B is too wordy.

I think Choice B is better phrased but I would recommend reframing the use of the word unethical. Maybe instead you mean "implicit bias"?

I think the words empowered, included, and connected makes the statement more meaningful.

I think "disrupting" is what makes both of these statements somewhat unappealing and negative. However, Option B is most attractive overall.

I think option B would make targeted consumers to feel more empowered and strong.

B is more classy and professional than A. A sounds spiteful and may be a turn off for some. I am a women of color and I like how B uses empowerment in describing the goals of the business.

Option B sounds more attractive and it makes more sense specially when our topic revolves with women in color and it also specify the main purpose or goal .

B is better than A

Provides support time to women of color shows that they have backing

The descriptors used in describing the women this business is targeted towards are listed together in B, which makes them more have more impact. Also, the one that states them as "feel[ing] empowered" isn't in A.

options b seems more on point

I llked the words used in B better- empowered, connected it read as more professional.

/it sounds more professional

A is awkwardly worded. Striving does not work well here as an adjective

I like the "empowered, included, and connected" part of option B. Overall, I think option B sounds really nice and very informative regarding the business and what it is about.

I chose B because the word unethicalness feels vague and awkward to me. B feels more specific about the goal of the company.

It seems a lot more comprehensive and motivating, less negative sounding

I like the words "empowered" and "connected," which provides more detail about what you're trying to accomplish.

Unethicalness feels weird and doesn't fit into the mission

I just love the wording for option B. Just by reading the last part of the sentence it makes me feel empowered and capable of doing something about any injustice. The first one choice A it tells me what its doing but doesn't let me feel connected to the movement as much as B. I would definitely respond to choice be a lot more than choice A.

i think this text is more inviting and makes you want to join the cause

Option B adds more texture and descriptions of being empowered, included and connected

I feel like the wording in Option B is more professional and caters more to women of color.

IM CONNECTED TO WORDS LIKE SUPPORT AND EMPOWERED AND CHOICE B DESCRIBES ITS MESSAGE FULLY AND COMPLETELY

Option B explains the statement better. It give reasons on how and why women of color should be feeling biasis. they should be give the same empowered tools as men.

Why does a woman have to be striving/a striver? It makes it sounds high barrier instead of inclusive and accessible

I choose option B because it is a more detailed message.

I like support. Support seems more action oriented and sincere.

I feel like this choice explains in more explicit terms the work they do. It is more descriptive overall and avoids using trigger words.

Although lengthy, this text flows better when read silently or aloud. Rather than focusing on negatives, it has some positive action words, creating hope and enthusiasm.

Gets out quickly it supports women of color. Takes more to get to that on option A. B also says more of what it does in more specifics