The shorter description gives me enough information to make an informed purchase decision like choice A

I think A is the best as it is the shortest name as the others are way too long.

Option A is very simple to understand

Short and sweet is the best for my attention span, honestly.

i will usually go for the shortest title.

Overall, the title that is shorter gets my attention quickest. The shorter descriptions tend to appeal to me more and I like having a concise set of information about the product.

Option A is the easiest to understand. Sensitive skin and including 'baby' makes me sure it is safe. The other titles list too many things, and some of the grammar (Washcloth Dry Fast should probably be Fast-Dry Washcloth) doesn't even sound correct in C.

I like it short and concise. The other ones have too many details. I don't care about the measurements.

I chose A as number 1 because it is the shortest. This one was to the point and only a few words, I understood what it was. The other 2 were way to long and honestly, I didn't even make it to the end because of my adhd. With that said, B is number 2 because the words sensitive skin appears sooner than choice C and as someone that has sensitive skin, I look for that first.

I chose A because the shorter description is quick and to-the-point. I am immediately able to envision the product.

I prefer choice A above the others because of how concise and focused it is, it sounds exciting and interesting but yet not so long that I get lost in the message

I like A the best because while it doesn't contain some information like the others such as "eco-friendly", "hypoallergenic", or the size of it, it also doesn't include a bunch of unnecessary keywords such as loofah, shower towel, sponge, etc., which made the other choices entirely too long with useless information. Choice C also has a typo which says "long towel for sensitive", which yes I understand you can surmise it means sensitive skin, but I'm always wary when product descriptions have obvious errors like that in them. It is unprofessional.

Option A title is short and crisp like how a title should be. Option B comes next with the dimension of scrub given which is very useful to look at. Option C has unnecessary information for a title.

This option is short and to the point.

Option B is the only choice that indicates up front that there are several cloth sizes available and then describes them. That's helpful and enticing.

I like option B because it gives more detail.

Option B because it included more information about the products than the other options

I like the exfoliating cloths being mentioned first.

B gives me good information and doesn't bog itself down too much with details that aren't needed.

I like B because I like that they say exfoliating cloths. That gets my attention over the other two.

Option B I think it explains it adequately and gives me the size/measurements and I find that extremely helpful. The other ones don't have the measurements in it.

I ranked A last because it sounds like it includes the least items in the product, and I'm not sure what it would mean for a washcloth to be for "woman and baby". I ranked B above C because I think it seems a bit strange that C has Korean, Japanese, and African items all in one, so I would be more likely to trust B.

Well it's a little lengthy I like that it gives off the different dimensions making it my first choice

I like B the most because it gives you a few statements about the item without being too much information. I like the call outs for "exfoliating cloth", "sensitive skin" and "eco-friendly washcloth". It is also nice that it has the dimensions of the item in the title, too, especially if it is for the back, someone will be looking for a bigger one like this. It might help to add if it is two handles, as back sponges sometimes do, so you can move the sponge back and forth easily with the handles instead of reaching around or bending your arm back behind you. A is next because it's not too much information. It still mentions that it is from Korea and that it is an exfoliating towel for sensitive skin. The vegetable part would make me think that it is eco-friendly even though it doesn't specifically say that it is. Saying that it is for women and babies is good because if it can be used on a baby's skin then it must be gentle. C is last because it is just too much information at once. It is missing the word "skin" after "long towel for sensitive" so I would add that if this one is chosen. The part about "African exfoliating net" is a little confusing to me if it is also a "vegetable fiber", unless I am just confused about this and it makes sense to others. The "African exfoliating net" makes me think that that is the material used in the scrubber, but it has already been stated that it is "vegetable fiber".

B and c give me the most information, I think that a should provide more details in the title

B is the most descriptive which gives me the best perception of it.

I would choose the title in Option B because it has many more details, such as the dimensions. I like Option A second best because it does not contain as many details, but it is simple and straightforward, making it easy to understand. I like Option C last because it is confusing.

The introducing words are similar, so they grab the initial attention equally. But more detail is better, and thus the choices are ranked by the level of detail.

I like B first because it gives the most detail about the dimensions of the product. C because it let's you know that their product is hypoallergenic. A is last because it is not necessary to put in the description for woman and baby. It should be for anyone who wants to have soft skin.

B contains the fewest errors. In A, "Clean washcloth for women" makes very little sense.

I would click option B because it has specific details like the dimensions of the loofah scrub.

I like how the items in option B, it sounds like a nice spa kit. Option C sounds pretty good too, there is a nice variety. Option A is okay, but it doesn't sound as appealing as option B.

I frankly think they are all too long, but I would go with B since it seems to include the most objective information. Option C would be good, but it is confusing to say that it is both Korean and Japanese in the same sentence. The first bit of A is weird for including the word 'vegetable' right up front, so I definitely wouldn't go with that.

I prefer B because it’s the most specific in its description of the makeup of the cloths and the size.

Back scrubber doesn't sound really nice.

Gives the most information about the product and most importantly the dimensions.

This sounds like you get a lot more with it which gives you the sense you get more than what you need.

Having vegetable so close to the beginning is a "no" for me. I like Korean Exfoliating Back Scrubber as the top because it tells me exactly what it's purpose.

I think choice C is a lot more descriptive, I'm more interested in that one.

My top choice catches the attention right away and is more precise with describing the product

Options C and B are straight easy to understand statements about the product.

The description is more specific so it’s easier to understand.

The Korean exfoliating back scrubber is very specific and it paints a picture in my head. I rather use it than a exfoliating towel in option A

I love C and B a lot because it offers great details about the product which is helpful for me as a shopper. From there, I feel like I am drawn over to B less because I like how C is about the ingredients and how it helps for me.

This one gives me the most information about the product. I don’t need to know the dimensions.

A sounded a little too generic and wasn't as informative as C, which called out more specific features.

I picked the most appealing title to me

I ranked the titles based on which descriptions were the most understandable and resonated with me as I read them, and based on how much detailed information they provided. I like detailed information when I read product descriptions.

Option C lets you know it works well for people who might have allergy sensitivities.

Option C is the most detailed, precise, and informative bit of information for me.