I like the apocolypse look in the cover

I like how it is more of a close up on the cover.

I like this because it shows a city under destruction with the mask compared to the other.

A looks scarier and makes me imagine more chaotic scenes

I like the extra detail of the decaying city at the bottom, looks more exciting and interesting to me.

GIVES MORE VISUAL INFO ABOUT BOOK

I like A because the background behind the mask might give an idea of the setting the book is in. Looks war torn.

I like the blend of the face and the chaotic scene.

It looks less creepy

I picked choice A because of the background on the cover.

I like the background imagery that gives a hint at the plot of the story. Much more eye catching than B.

The background with the damaged buildings and bridge makes me want to learn more about what happened.

there is more to focus on on the cover it draws me into wanting to check this out

The imagery in choice A is more vivid and compelling. I want to know more about this story.

I prefer the closer up mas and the way the words are positioned in choice A

The art on A paints a much more interesting picture; B is incredibly vague as to what the book might be about.

A makes the face more of a mystery, and gives me an image of the world that the story takes place in.

I think this cover gives a little more insight into what the book is about.

I don't care that the author is a best seller. I read boos based on their premise regardless of the author.

I think the scene at the bottom makes it more intriguing and you want to know more.

I like the face in the back ground

I chose A because it seemed to tell a little more in regards to what the book is about. With option A I can tell that it involves the destruction of a city while option b gives no information on what the book is about. When I choose a book to read I base it off of what the book is about and not about whether or not the author is a USA Today Best Selling Author.

It shows a scene of carnage so maybe the book is about a disaster or apocalypse.

the shights of the broken city shows that i going to be a twisted post accopcaliptic world and that will being in more audancs than just the white mask

The broken cityscape give it a darker vibe, and having only one eye show is more effective than both.

I like how seeing the city gives me a glimpse of what could be happening in the book.

B looks more realistic showing the entire mask.

a singular focus with the blood mask is more of my style, minimal without too much going on in the back

I like being able to see the shape of the face. It is less creepy.

I liked the whole mask being visible. It makes it interesting and I think more eerie.

The cityscape looks bad.

I think it looks sharper, cleaner. sleaker.

more mysterious and bold looking

b is more basic and minimalistic. and it indicates the success of the book as "bestselling author".

B has a more simple and clearcut cover and it also says NY Times Best Seller, which is very persuasive to me to buy the book.

This was a tough one to choose, because both are beautiful. Ultimately though I choose choice B because I like the font and the mention of it being a bestseller, I also appreciate the ability to focus on the mask and they eyes.

this is what I like

I really like this cover design. It is simple, stark, and charged.

I like the mask on image B the best, it is clean cut and still mysterious

Option B is more arresting due to the bestseller information; that never hurts and always catches the eye.

The book cover reads USA today best selling author. I like the picture better with two eyes. The other picture reminds me of an alien.

I like both cover pictures actually. They both look professionally done. I like the mask being the focus just slightly more. And probably because they mention he is a best selling author.

I like both, but I chose B because it looks cleaner

i prefer the mask with the 3d look to it. adds more depth to the cover

This looks like a lot of attention was put into this book. Def would be more interested in this book for this reason.

I would buy choice B because of two things. The first is that the cover is simpler and more striking. The second thing I notice is that choice B says USA Today best selling author.

The bestselling author line really gives a sense of reliability to how good the book is going to be. I actually prefer the graphic on A, but I look for a clue that the author is actually good if I'm unfamiliar and would choose B.

this one draws me eye better

I like the "best selling ..." above the title.

Being honest, I would like a hybrid. I prefer the image of the city, but I think having the best selling author tag is more important. If you did both I think that would be ideal.