I choose option A because it has more convincing, interesting, better written description.

I like this description of the story better the B.

Option A has an active and positive spin on the protagonists must resolve the problem. Option B is negative as they must HIDE their secret. I therefore choose the positive outlook of Option A.

This plot summary engages me quicker and more effectively.

The first paragraph of A made me curious enough to want to purchase this book

This description flows a lot better than the other.

the whole "Darwin screams while caught in a booby trap" made me laugh, and not in a positive way. A sounds more serious than B

I like the way this is worded better as it feels more natural and more enticing.

I think A is descriptive enough to set the reader up to kind of know the basic story but doesn't go into too much details about what's going on specifically. Like the part about Eyrun screaming because she stepped into a booby trap vs in A we just get the information that she stepped into a booby trap and almost died. Some of the stuff in B is something I'd rather read in the book itself not a shot description.

I liked choice A since the description is more direct and to the point while being easy to read. Choice B is a bit lengthy and not as direct.

This sounds more intriguing and more exciting to read.

I chose A because its explains more about the characters and makes the book sound interesting.

Oh, I really like A with its clarity and description! Based on this, I am intrigued and would want to read this option.

I find A a little clearer and easier to follow, making it more gripping.

Option A focuses on one character's experience (Darwin) and it makes me want to connect with him.

I am intriguing by the idea of an alchemy lab with powerful crystals.

The first paragraph does a better job laying out the characters background and the writing is more professional.

Option B - makes the Eyrun story line sound like she's helpless and the way the paternity suit is described sounds like it's from the Maury Povich show. You don't ask, but the name Eyrun is annoying...I'll spend half the time wondering how it's supposed to be pronounced. Reading Option A I wasn't sure if they were male or female.

Option A seems to initiate the summary with more character development which is often how the best stories start.

I prefer Option A because it explains who Darwin Lacroix is and puts her in a role of the main character.

A captured my attention sooner than B. B had me questioning what the story was and why would I want to read it when the description is boring.

This one is a little more clear to me.

We don't know who Eyrun is , so the one introducing Darwin first then saying she is his partner is more clear.

I think option A sounds a little more interesting. I think the word choices are slightly better. THe one that stands out is the paternity suit line and "could his life get worse".

I chose A because it seems a bit more linear and coherent, and does not give away certain points of the story. I also appreciate that A describes the main character at the beginning of the story.

I chose option B because the character is introduced by name earlier in the plot.

I THINK THIS OPTION SOUNDS VERY INTERESTING AND WOULD BE A HARD BOOK TO PUT DOWN

I think Bs wording choices let it flow better. A is a bit choppy and harder to follow.

I think it more interesting to know that person is in a coma.

B is simpler and easier to skim

I prefer the wording of this description, it is more entertaining to me

I chose B because A contains too much superfluous information as a teaser for the book.

I chose panel B. Both are very good and I could easily lose myself in the story line. I love unknown tunnels and a story in itself about the double edged sword. Both are great and quite similar but I like the wording in B a little more.

This description seems more exotic and contains exciting details that make me want to read more of the book!

Option B. This option more clearly plays on his reputation as a Vatican director. He has to solve the crisis of the crystals and deal with his paternity issues

I preferred B, it gave some details so you know what level of interesting the book will be. The way it is worded is very relatable. B makes the book appear to be full a exciting and different adventures.

I prefer option B. It has a better flow and is more down to earth.

This option gives you a taste of the style you'd be reading and does a much better job of drawing your attention in and making you want to read the rest of the story

i like how the first paragraph hits better. To be honest, I'd break it down to 1-2 sentences. It's a lot to read in a summary. You have little time to gain my interest and I think both are a little too much. The names don't really serve to help me as I don't know the characters yet. I'd generalize the conflicts a little more to garnish interest then deliver resolution after reading the book.

This describes Darwins past a little better

I choose option B because the author uses proper nouns whereas option A uses more pronouns which is not as clear to the reader.

I find Bs description to be more comprehensive and concise.

I like description B the best. I like the primise of the adventure. it sounds really good and peaks my interest.

I like B because the way things are described make it sound more interesting to me.

They are way too similar to chose between them. This one sounds a tad more intriguing.

I like the idea that the story is set across different countries. It adds a level of mystery.

The description was easier to read and the flow was smotther.

the 'Eyrun screams ...' part sounds more interesting than 'Vatican director...'

I chose option B because it gives slight more detail than option A.

There are too many names, B uses Darwin's intead of his. It makes more clear.