at first I like b, because I first felt like if it came with a "warning" then it wasn't for me. THen, I thought about it and I have never seen something like this and it was sort of entertaining. I hate a Christmas Carol and some of the other style of books mentioned, but for a fun summer by the pool read, this might be a good easy choice. The rough Irish and gentle English girl are very cliche and the un-approving family are very cliche as well, but then sometimes you just want to get lost in a familiar story and just escape the virus and family life of today.. I like option A better out of these two.

I liked the last part of the blurb better. It tells me more of what to expect from this book.

A is intriguing, passionate, emotional, engaging, and immersive.

The contain warning and the reading option provided at the end helps to choose the right book and also shows honesty about the book which even gravitate us to read.

I like to choose option A. It has more details

I choose the A option because i enjoy reading archaic 19th-century British English.

I like option A better. It has more and better explanations what you get buying the book. It has more details about the book. It has a clear message to potential buyers, "If you prefer modern novels, PLEASE DO NOT READ! This book is not for you. Dauntless Hearts is written for ‘we happy few’ who enjoy archaic 19th-century British English." So people know for sure what they could expect from this book. This honest and decent position. I appreciate this.

Option A, the warnings in capital letters makes it more appealing.

I chose Option A as my top choice because not only is this description of the book very detailed but it also gives a fair warning about the genre of the novel and I can appreciate the honesty. I would definitely choose to read this book.

I like the final paragraph in option A. IT gives me more info about the book, although I would want to read both descriptions.

I would buy A because it's choice of word is related to each other and the context can be visualised in real life.

Option A sounds more romantic and fun

I like that it gives a warning and makes me think they care about their readers.

They're pretty much the same description, except Option A is a bit longer as it includes specific references to other books similar to this book. Not only does it help draw people in as it is compared to other very famous novels they probably read, but it also gives a disclaimer in case people aren't expecting the more antiquated old-English style of the novel. I think this is really important not only for attracting readers, but also for making sure readers are aware of the specific style of the writing and setting of the book.

I would definitely prefer option A because I like the fact that it gives a content warning to give you a better understanding of the book which is really an interesting concept for sure.

I like this description because it provides more detail. I also like the fact that it compares other books. I think it is very important that people are finding the types of reading material that they like.

it include a content warning

I am super thrown off by the fact that the choice a says do not read this book is not for you. In fact I can't even understand why on earth that would be bold. So I wouldn't read it. I see that it's meant as a ploy to get to read however it turns me off entirely. I think that instantly it feels negative. Just because I like modern novels doesn't mean I can't like this style too.

My preference for B is because of the uniqueness of the book discription, the discription really tell about the book and give some nice impressions about the book and the content of the page use is a dope idea of words arrangement for this book and will call more attentions to it and will influence me to learn more about it

I can't stand when a description then turns into a recommendation. The description tells plenty of informationn in choice B for me to determine if the book would be of interest to me. The second part in choice A puts me off of the book immediately.

I like B because it displays the positives of reading the book rather than telling customers not to buy it.

Base on the the description, I would read the book of option B. The book of option B is well described and the description is easier to understand.

B seems like a description that wants to explain the book to me and persuade me I'd like to read it. A seems invested in giving me some kind of weird sense of superiority for liking it, and that makes me uncomfortable. I don't think I'd actually change my decision whether to buy the book based on either description, so it's more of a slight preference here.

I am a big fan of "less is more" Having less of a description to read left me with more imagination about what the story will be about. It made me intrigued to learn more and want to read the book.

B is preferable because I don't think you need the warning label. I would love this book!

Strong female protagonist is my favorite style, so I would really enjoy Option B.

Option B explanation looks more crisp. I would like this

I think the warning at the end of the other description is a tad strange.

I feel this story line is a great one!! It sounds like it has tons of romance and is drawing the readers in with love and passion. I would love to read this book!!

I don't understand why the last part (warning) is included in Choice A. It interrupts the flow. Thus, B wins by default.

I felt that the verbiage in B was positive in nature, whereas the verbiage in A was full of negative adjectives and warnings. I would read the book described in B much likelier than the the description in A.

Oh my gosh, the content warning on A is so off putting. I'd throw it down just for that. How pretentious can you be. Also, the line "she quits him" is terrible. Re-write that- geez.

I get why the warning is needed for new romance readers or newbies. But, I find them really annoying since I've read historical romances for awhile now. I especially don't like when it sounds click-baity with exclamation marks and all-caps.

I dont like the warning i feel like that would cause people to look away

B targets who it is for, A warns those who might be against it. It is always better to go with the positive.

I prefer the shorter version of option B as it still hooks you into the plot while still not being long winded and dragged out. I prefer to just receive a summary of the plot and find out myself about the book rather than receiving a content warning at the end.

You don't need all of the extra info at the bottom, you could figure out that it is written in old english just by previewing a page or 2.

While I somewhat appreciate the content warning, I can't imagine reading classic novels that stick one in right in the middle of the description. Maybe consider a content warning sticker like music albums do instead. The first few paragraph really throw me into the setting quite well, and I can see the author spent a lot of time creating immersion, but the sudden content warning snaps me out of it.

Choice b is to long and the warning is kind of annoying

I dig it without the warning. I can handle what the book is about.

Option A description is more intriguing and attentive than option B. I is short and to the point.

The description is a little shorter to read but gets me interested enough to want to read the book.

Option B, because its story stimulates my curiosity. The A tambien option stimulates my curiosity, however its last paragraph makes me lose interest in what I have read.

I appreciate the warning that’s it not for everyone but it’s also a breaking point for me! I’d rather have the strong female and appeal to the strong female attributes than a warning.

I like option B because it just tells me all about the book. I don't like option A's content warning, especially it being in caps, like shouting. I can usually tell enough by the description of a book if I'm going to like it and I don't like that it says "this book is not for you", I can decide that myself.

Option A is the book I would rather read is because is has less reading to do in the beginning of my choice which would make me think the contents of the book would be more than necessary when reading.

i like choice B the best. It's a lot shorter of a description.

I don't really think a content warning is necessary and if anything it turns me off, since it's not really an author's business to tell me what I will and will not enjoy reading.

I like the shorter fifth paragraph. The content warning on A is kind of funny, but I don't really need it in a book synopsis. B looks more professional.

i dont like the warning in the other version