Option A provides a much better overview of the book than Option B.

i love the first one that it gives just a bit of context but enough to get me interested

It seems like A has better subtitles and a more catchy first liner.

I like the attention grabbing first sentence of this one.

Sounds much more exciting to read

The first sentence in A grabs me. The first sentence in B bores me.

The summary was a bit more brief, left more to the imagination. B didn't flow very well. If that was the quality of writing of the book, I was really turned off.

The headline on this one grabs you right away, you don't have to read anything else to know it's intense and exciting

I like the hook at the beginning.

It looks way more professional and more interesting. Good information too.

Definitely A. If I'm thinking about reading a military thriller, the thought of war between North Korea and South Korea grabs my attention much more than does ad copy focusing on romance.

I like how A gives a quick talk about the book in the headline and then if you need or want to know more you an read a little about the characters in the book. It does look exciting!

Easier to get into the story with option A. The shorter, more direct sentences g ert you involved quickly. You want to know what's in the top secret lab. You feel like you are Sam. I would use this as the more engaging intro.

B has too much uneeded information and is boring. A is simple and to the point and somewhat riveting

A is hands-down more readable, clearer, and more compelling. B is disjointed and confusing. Starting as it does, it's hard to figure out what's going on until you've read nearly all of it. It has overly long sentences and ineffective use of white space. A uses bold type, white space and short, snappy sentences to create a compelling introduction to the book.

I get what it is about much faster.

A IS EASIER TO QUICKLY SEE WHAT THE BOOK IS ABOUT. B GOES INTO DIALOGUE BEFORE GIVING THE READER AND UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT THEY ARE GETTING.

I am able to understand clearer

The description of the characters in option B makes them not sound very likable. They seem more interesting, as well as the plot, in option A.

I chose option A because it was easier to read and helped me make a faster decision. I want to find information about the book quickly.

I don't need the long rambling description that B provides. Let us keep it short and concise.

Option A bookk ddescridesc makes me want to click because the book description of option A is well titled which makes the book to be understanding by reading the title.

This is a more straightforward and understandable preview so I find it more intriguing.

A is an acceptable, if generic, plot synopsis and blurb trying to get you to pick up the book.. B is strange, it's a mix of actual writing and plot synopsis/blurb, and it's poorly written, and confusing, and it shifts from purpose to purpose. If B represents what this book is actually like, it's told me enough to know that I don't want to read it :/

I found the bold words in B to be quite distracting. While I probably wouldn't read the book (not my kind of thing), I found A to be a better way to market and package the book.

It feels more like a real description of a professional novel in comparison to B.

Short and descriptive sentences do a good job describing what the book is about.

The heading seems more intriguing and the details of the story appear to be more interesting in this version of the description.

I like the way the book is described in my choice because it gives details about the book without inserting the dialogue or passages from the book itself

A/ This description is much better with the header in bold at the top providing a description summary. it saves time. Also the use of bold fonts is good to emphasis the exciting parts. It sounds interesting. I would purchase it.

I think that one reads better than the other one if that makes any sense whatsoever

i think requesting a court martial should be very unique and want to learn about the circumstances

I like option B. I think it is a little more personal as in the characters,.

The OptinB book description sounds better. It's easy to understand and relate to.

I love to hear about feuding countries.

The dialog sneak preview was appreciated and helped hook me. Also the adjective "techno-thriller" seemed to resonate with me. The whole thing seemed to have more substance.

The option B book description seems to appeal to me more and would be more likely to interest me in pickup up the book, though both options have their own merits.

Jump into the story.

I feel like this version let me learn more about the character Sam Harper, which makes me feel more intrigue about where this is going.

I personally like B more because I like getting this insight into the book. I am able to get a peak at the writing style and the personalities in the book as well as a small idea of what the story is about.

B seems more story like to me and gets me more interested in the book.

very useful in all .

I like how B kind of takes you in media res and throws you into the experience. I think the beginning is provocative, and it made me want to keep reading. I like how you get a first-hand account from the characters and kind of get to experience them right away.It feels like the book, not a blurb about a book. A just sounds like it was written by a literary egghead who's trying to summarize the plot. I feel like B gives me the synopsis without spoon feeding it to me.

Much more surreal sounding.

I like this and i love this

this would make me want to read this book

Option b sounds exciting and like it would hold my interest for a duration of the book. I like how the description builds up the subject and draws me in to want to know more and read more. I am interested in the subject just based on the description and how it describes everything

I chose B as the description I liked the most because it was much more detailed and really gave me an insight to what the book was about. I liked reading about the characters and getting a introduction to them. Choice A was OK, just didn't really help me to decide if I would buy this book.

B is more engaging and sounds more adventurous. A was hard to follow and seemed dry and boring in tone. In A, I think it should say “about whom to trust” and not “about who to trust.” B makes me feel more involved in the story.

this text makes you feel the story line more and want to purchase the book more