This option sounds more like something that would catch my eye if I was looking for a book to read. It feels like it is more descriptive than the other option and gives more detail about what the book would be about if I were to choose to pick it up and buy it.

Option A sounds more legible and comprehensive.

The description in Option A seems much more concise and draws the reader in, it's definitely more succinct and touches upon all of the plot points in the book. It makes me want to read it! Option B seems a little more erratic, less put together.

B seems to be a bit loose in focus and jumbled in places compared to A's straightforward approach.

A is much more succint and on point with my interests, B comes off as an attempt to overgeneralize

It's less over the top in the description department. The other one is just way too much in that respect.

Seems more natural in description, more grammatically correct and less forceful.

I picked A because the plot is outlined in a manner that is more cohesive. It gradually builds suspense for the story as your read more.

A was a bit more concise, describing the plot of the book in better detail.

The narrative of the description flows better in Choice A. Choice B reads like it wants to grab attention but it doesn't make the novel sound interesting, it makes it sound more like a plot for an episode of a program. Choice B also sounds more "train of thought" rambling than a book cover description.

This description just made more sense and what straight to the point and easy to understand. This description wasn't long blown out.

B just seems too disjointed and not very descriptive, A is much better

The more consistent use of the correct grammatical model make me think A is a better choice. The random use of ellipses is annoying it it concerns me for the reliability of the authors ability to write.

A is the traditional format for book descriptions and the reason is that it flows well. B is odd and disjointed and all of the ellipsis (...) are unnecessary and just a strange way of presenting information. It doesn't flow. It's also too long. The English in both is bad and needs to be edited professionally.

I like the careful way A tells me about the book in complete sentences. While the B book is good, it speaks in partial sentences and loses me halfway through the description whereas A does not.

The summary for option B was choppy and cliche. Option A had a straightforward and easy to read description.

I chose Option A because it was easier to follow along the plot description. It was in more of a short form. Option B was very choppy. Too much information kind of jumbled together. Was not as easy to get the full picture of the book.

Option B flows better. Both seem to give away too much of the plot, but Option B is less stop-and-go with all the extra dots.

Better use of vocabulary and mixes up the story with more real events.

I choose option A because it id at least compelling. Option B is HORRIBLE 1LT surfer/nerd....spec ops dudes....is this a joke? Option A at least sounds professional something I would attempt to read, the other I wouldn’t waste me.

Option A is easier to understand because it explains the subject of the book more fully. It focuses more on the war between South Korea and North Korea which is the most interesting part of this story.

I feel like B is cliff notes more like an article about a book. A seems comprehensive and more descriptive and put together which fits more with my expectations for a book

OPTION A GIVES A LOT MORE DETAIL ABOUT THE BOOK AND MAKES IT SOUND MORE INTERESTING AND ENGAGING.

I choose A because this description would make me want to buy the book on Amazon. It is organized and easy to read. The description in A is all over the place and not easy to read.

Option A gives a coherent, exciting description of the novel, while Option B seems like a series of notes that haven't been cleaned up prior to posting.

I felt I understood the story right off the bat with this description. It hooked me in much sooner.

Option B seems to disconjointed and seems jumbled. Option A sounds more interesting and I like the format more than the breaks that are in Option B.

I don't like how the structure of B is filled with ellipses. It is overdone and distracting.

A was a lot more legible and easy to understand. It was in paragraphs and much easier to read.

While option A is less wordy it captures my attention more.

A is more compelling.

I chose A because it had more narrative flow. While Option B had some tension, it was hard to actually know whether the book was going to be written in a traditional style or not.

This description is easier to read. The other one is long, with all the different clauses on different lines, which makes the description a bit choppy. Seems like an interesting book!

The other option is WAY too choppy, it makes the description unreadable and is a huge turn off. I feel like I'd actually read the the chosen description.

I wanted to choose A because I typically like book descriptions with longer sentences/paragraphs and dislike descriptions with short, choppy sentences. But the first sentence in A; " North and South Korea on a collision course with..." doesn't sound right to me. I think it needs are to be "North and South Korea are on a collision course..." even if it's grammatically correct the way the first sentence is written totally threw me in description A. If I'd been reading that on the back of the actual book I would have put it back down and picked something else. I also think that option B first the style of the book. The short choppy sentences, although not my personal favorite, fit the action packed storyline and help build intrigue. I also like that there's a dedication on the back, making me think that the story will be similar in style to those authors, whom I greatly enjoy. Finally, "Get your copy now!" invokes action and it's good to end with a call to action.

Option B is much more engaging to read because of the way it is written with an economy of words...less is always more!

I think choice b tied in a love story. Bringing in the ex girlfriend into the description makes my interest peak. I think it is the spin I am looking for compared to the choice a. I felt I had more of a timeline in choice b. The outline was more intriguing in choice b as well. Choice a was shorter and not as long winded but I wasn't as interested. It didn't reel me in per say as the choice b description was able to.

B is a little easier for me to read. Both are hard to follow as the grammar just does not flow very well.

B is much easier to read and process. A is difficult to follow for me. I also love the "dedicated" part at the end on B. I love the authors it mentions! B makes me want to purchase the book if I can find it. Trying to read through the entire description on A annoyed me so much that I wouldn't even care about the book if I saw it.

A is a completely disjointed mess of words that is hard to make any sense from it. B is a little better. It seems more in the style of a book cover description. The “dedicated to” part comes across as just name dropping to boost sales.

I like the digestible format of the topics that are in the book - it makes me want to read it and it is easier to read quickly.

this book goes into more details

I prefer this description because it is easier to read and when it tells me to get my copy now it makes me think I should before they are sold out.

I’m more intrigued by this description mainly because I’m interested in knowing more about the CIA employed ex-girlfriend character because of my interests in female characters with traditionally or stereotypically male jobs and their portrayal in fiction.

leaves the reader on the edge wanting more

B is exciting, immersive, engaging, and interesting.

B leaves me wanting more. I am eager to read and find out what happens!

this sounds very interesting, and this version seems to create more of a sense of suspense

A tells too much of the plot. I have no reason to read the book if so much is given away in the synopsis.

B because it is much easier to read. I had to struggle to get started on A. B was easy to read and understand.