It sounds like it would be more interesting and better written.

Easier to understand and more like my taste in books. I like it

I say utilize the shorter description, because I think most people who browse and read through those wouldn't always stop and read the bigger version...kind of a "ok I'm browsing not after a whole essay right now" kind of situation.

I would read option "A". The short passage looks interesting and intriguing.

I would rather read a book with a brief and pithy description, as I don't have a lot of time in my life for long descriptions.

Right in the first couple of sentences it's a real, true love story. I'd rather read this one.

This option jumped into the character development in a much more efficient manner.

A sounds a lot less hackneyed and trite than B.

This is the book I would rather read. The succinct blurb is captivating and less lengthy.

Option A sounds like it would be a much more appealing and engaging read. It would be fascinating to read about a courtship that old, what things were like back then.

I liked that option A explored more of a family's past/relationship. It just had me more intrigued.

I think I would choose A because it sounds the most like a memoir.

The description in A is shorter and easier to read than B

Option A sounds very nostalgic and heartfelt. I can imagine that once I pick up this book and start reading it that I would not want to put it down until I am done. This description alone is very captivating and I am intrigued and want to read what this book has to offer, it sounds entertaining

Concise and makes me imagine what the story is about

I think the description sparks more interest with me because it seems more like a tale rather than just a story told by someone.

B provides much more detail and more interesting.

I like B because I like how it starts out with the description of the man. It gets my attention right away. A doesn't really grab my interest.

Option B drew me in and made me want to know more about the story.

Option B appears to be more interesting and exciting. It also seems to be more well-written.

This is a much more detailed and intriguing idea and description. I think this one has more nuance and would be more interesting to read, the characters well descried.

I picked B as my top choice as it gives me a better detail on the book.

Option A seems very heartfelt, but I can't lie that B caught my attention much more quickly. Whether it's because I can relate to the story of an outcast, or have hope that I'm the type who would attract someone like the female in the story, I would be much more inclined to read choice B in its entirety.

I like England in 1812 good times.

I like option B better because the description sounds more intriguing.

B is much better - it engulfs you into the story pretty well and is interesting. I dig it and would read it

Option B sounds far more interesting, since the characters seem a lot more unique and there's actual conflict in the narrative. Option A just doesn't sound like there's much to the story unless you want something like a 'Chicken soup for the soul' type of experience.

B sounds like a much more interesting story. It had captivating elements that I didn't get from the other option.

I prefer option B because it sounds more descriptive and vivid to me. Option A doesn't feel quite as interesting for me.

The way this is written makes the book sound more intriguing. I'd want to learn more about this to see what makes it different than other romance novels.

This synopsis feels more like a colorful anecdote that would spark my attention and make me want to read the book. The other option seems a bit stale.

I voted for b because it seems thrilling and exciting m

The Regency romance sounds fairly typical for the genre, but still hits notes that intrigue and draw the reader in. I'm sorry, but I'm not interested in reading about someone else's parents' courtship - even the writing in the description is boring and dull.

B is very descriptive and provides lots of imagery. It was easy to imagine the story line, and it is articulated very well as your attention increased as you continued to read, especially when asked questions A is too personal and bland

Option A makes the book sound like there was no conflict and everything was perfect. It’s a lot less interesting than Option B.

It was longer to read but I really liked the intro. It grabbed my attention fast!

The phrasing in this one is significantly more appealing and unique.

B is the choice because it gives details about the book that help the reader to know what it is. It will be a Regency romance with authentic language. It is not clear what option A is—yes a true accounting but is it more inspirational or something else. B is also the choice because it is less likely to be in first person which is annoying to read and when blurbs are in first person it is best to assume and avoid the book. Especially first person and passive voice.

I really like the background detail. It's so in depth and makes me interested in the story.

Definitely an abstract of the book makes it more intriguing than the author rambling over a boring intro. Without doubt choice B, as option A is boring starting from the very first sentence.

The description of B, which I chose, immediately shows what kind of book it is and tells what sort of conflicts and twists you'll expect to see throughout, particularly of the romantic variety. It seems to have her desires and dreams as a central focus as well so it should be more appealing to a larger audience of people than those simply looking for a quick romantic skim. I'm pretty sure this would have the most marketability and general appeal, that that of option A.

I want to read about a character study rather than a couple

Both sound boring in my opinion but the option B sounds like it may have a few interesting pieces with the familial conflict.

tells more about the person

I like option B slightly better. It was a more well written summary, and sounded more interesting overall.

I chose panel B. It is more relevant to me as I didn't know my mother until I was 17. I relate to B in the way of my uncle, he wasn't a giant but an outcast of the family as he married an Asian woman. Until the family grew to love her they were both outcast. I do think however, both of these would be great reads.

B story sounds more interesting because of the characters and setting. Option A description does nothing to gain my interests.

I would prefer choice B because I like the fact that it is a period story and takes place in Regency England. I like to read books that take me to another time or another land.

I chose option B because it is more about the book characters instead of the author. I would be able to get involved in the story better.

It seems like the more interesting story