Seems compelling and of interest about a topic I have recently considered on the surface

I think it doesnt need c or b A seems the most direct and influential. C i think speaks a bit better if you want to have more.

A is the most practical, logical and straightforward, followed by C. B is too hippy-dippy with the Mother Earth stuff.

I like the line about how the biggest choice you can make is by choosing what's on your plate. It creates a simple actionable item for people to follow,

I prefer A, as my concerns are more about climate change than diet. B is not bad, but a little too 60s for me. C really doesn't appeal to me.

I highly prefer option A because it starts out specifically mentioning climate change.

I like the thoroughness of the excerpt in option A, so that is the book I would choose.

I prefer option A since it overtly references the problem of climate change, which is very important to me. Option B seems a bit too hippie to me with references to "mother earth".

Although all of them could be trimmed significantly to have more impact, Option A makes the most concrete presentation right up front, laying out the scope of the problem. C comes next because it offers a guiding hand to the reader, without being too preachy. B is in last place because it is too vague to really grab anyone's attention and keep them reading.

I prefer option A because to me it feels the most descriptive and enticing. Option C and B look alright but don't interest me as much!

I chose on which is the most brief and to the point. I do not need a very long description or narrative to understand the theme or objective.

This one feels more like a challenge. It is like it is challenging me to save the earth. All of the points are laid out so clearly. I really like it

A.. BECAUSE I FEEL LIKE WITH THAT DESCRIPTION i would be reading with choices and its not trying to overly persuade me and i have options.

Choice A actually starts off directly with presenting an argument, with examples, that makes me feel like it is not just going to be a preachy book telling me why I MUST do something. The other 2 options already put me on the defensive about what the book is going to claim, and it would probably cause me to skip over or discount the rest of the argument as laid out in A. I think A all by itself would be the best.

Option A looks very descriptive and aligns with my values

I will go for option A' because it gives a clear description of the book making it quite simple to understand.

Option A is my preferred choice because it is more compelling and interesting.

I think option A is best because it creates an urgent call to action that is bigger than any one person.

I like the appeal to taking care of mother earth.

is able to put focus on this being a story before calling me to action/convincing me of something

Option B would most convince me because it is short and to the point - grabbing my attention early and convincing me of the value of the book.

B is the strongest because the lead sentence makes the most impact: Mother Earth needs us. That says it all, right there.

I chose B first because I liked the appeal to help Mother Earth. I chose C second because it started off with the premise that most people think it's too hard. I chose A last because it's far too long and preachy.

it seems to appeal to something deeper within me. something spiritual

Option B is the best. It is not phrased as a question but an appeal for you to help the planet. Option A is good, addressing climate change is important. Option C is the worst as talking about plant based makes it seem like this is about a diet.

I will prefer option B more because the description of the book story has touched my heart. It has a cry for help for our m0ther earth. The first line of the story will make you think and purchase the book.

I like the image or metaphor of Mother Earth and would probably emotionally respond to that one the most. It's the most persuasive and vivid image

I like that it references mothers because as a mother I can relate to that.

C- First just talks about going plant based, which is useful because there are many reasons to go plant based beyond climate change. A - Leading off with saving the planet from climate change seems like a big task. B - Way too hippy-ish.

Because its the most straightforward without trying to tell a story.

I prefer C because it feels the most interesting and coherent, and it draws me in more.

I like the message that it can be easy to go plant based.

C I feel is the most descriptive and gives me the best understanding of it.

C I like the intro (going plant based) the best, as it is more understandable. A because I like the original (just needed a bit more to it). B because it is ok, but I like the other 2 better.

I feel that showing it can be easy to make the eco friendly switch is what most people want out of the service

The questions at the start is engaging. I like that's it's personal and not as general compared to the other choices.

I would be most drawn to the paragraph indicating that going plant-based actually isn't too hard (because for me, it is!).

I chose by options that are simplest and most approachable.

A is too long and not to the points. C sounds both informative and concise.

I liked the sound of option C the most because it appeals to the idea of you want to do good and transit to more plant-base product but worry it might be difficult. I just found it to be more relatable which is why it was my top choice. Option A, I thought had a stronger opening line than option B. Option B, sounded okay. It's wording could be a bit stronger and more appealing.

C easier then think sounds more user friendlyB sound slike call to action goodA too long not like it.

Option C's description would convince me the most to buy the book because it felt like the only synopsis that appealed to me directly with a guilt trip

Option C because I am moving to a plant based diet but I'd pass by Option A and B not realizing they were even about that. Mother earth and saving a planet with an ever changing climate from climate change put me off.

I ranked these based on how convincing each option was to me, personally.

More direct, it is easy to understand , asks you for help.

C is a little more to the point, but all of them may be a little too long for someone browsing to want to read to the end. B is awfully pretentious.

I love option C the most because it acknowledges how hard it is to go plant based for eating making it more relatable and attention getting.

I like that this focuses on going plant based as a goal, where the other descriptions seem much broader.

I like the shorter summation and the more conversational feel of C. While yes it leads in to the longer description I feel C is more attention grabbing for those that are not normally in to the plant based life.

C makes the most compelling argument for a plant based diet. It's concise in its structure and doesn't make you feel like it's being judgemental of your current choices. It gives me more of a positive feeling, that I would be doing this for our planet.