interested in a world without disease

I like how A gives more backstory and lets you find out the main story when you read while B gives away more of the main story.

I like the premise of the book and the challenges that may face the main character in this version

I like this one because it explains the EverDawn system a little better and helps me understand the story a little more.

I prefer this choice because the other has a bit too many name drops (either people or concepts) for a synopsis trying to bring in fresh readers. I have more of a feel for the story already with this option. I also find rhetorical questions at the beginning or ending of such paragraphs a bit overdone.

A is the more nicely written paragraph

Both are good, but I think this one would draw me in more.

I thought that option A was a bit better written and a bit more descriptive than option B. I thought that the wording for option A was slightly better even though I thought both options were pretty good.

I prefer not leaving the description end in a question. This one is more descriptive and makes me want to read the book more.

This book description makes it sound more like something that would be hard to put down as it is a scenario you could see yourself in.

I think by explaining that in the story humans can live without disease and not age in A it gives me key interesting information about he story that is not included in B.

I feel like this does a better job explaining and introducing the characters fluidly.

It reads more clearly. I get the plotline first before the character is brought up. I also was confused by the addition of Ascend in B.

I prefer the more direct statements of A, particularly without the question at the end.

I liked choice A since the description is more appealing informative. Choice B jumps right into the character's story without any background which isn't appealing.

I slightly prefer the more succinct synopsis provided in Option A as compared to the longer one in Option B, but both are solid.

I like choice A because it sounds like a very unique alternate reality/universe scenario that really drew me in a lot more than choice B. I feel what was described in choice A is more likely to happen than B so it's a lot more easier to visualize.

The bit about "Ascend" in Option B is a little confusing, so I'd rather read Option A.

I just generally like this one and I think it explains the situation better

A does a better job of world building. Also, B isn't as well written.

I prefer the more decisive summary. I don't like the summary trying to draw me in with questions

"have taken the one-way trip into EverDawn's digital world." sounds cold, closed off, and not exciting at all. This is a poor description and doesn't make me want to read this book.

This description would have me curious as to what is going to happen. Is there other people there who are fine with the world the way it is? Do they want people to pay to go in? What will happen before there is an agreement to be made?

I prefer choice A because it is more descriptive.

This passage flows better and gives some needed details that the other one does not.

I like how it lays out the story’s plot better than the other choice.

I feel like option A highlights that people can CHOOSE to be there, and that the battle isn't just for Lex, but for everyone.

B starts by saying "...one-way trip..."

A sounds more interesting and involving. B is okay but I didn't connect as well.

The early statement of humans as a whole versus lex's family makes it a lot more interesting.

Option a of a better write up and leave me wanting more. It really gets my imagination going

I like the characters how they are written.

i like this except/idea a bit better, it feels like something i would read

I like the name Lex is just brings a sense of mystery.

I like the focus on the character as I really like character driven stories over worldbuilding forays.

They are both pretty similar and hard to choose. This option is a bit easier to read though.

B TALKS ABOUT A DIGITAL WORLD. THIS MAKES THE BOOK SOUND FUN, EXCITING, AND MORE OF A SYFY TYPE BOOK

This is the synopsis that makes me likely to read rebellion martyr. This one kept me more interested than the one in A

Option B piques my interest in the digital realm of EverDawn and the horrors it brings to the world for people. I am deeply intrigued by the character of President Mason, and I want to know his motives for control and domination, as well as his backstory and how he came to power.

I like that the character is introduced earlier, makes you relate mor

I like that choice B goes a little out of its comfort zone in terms of dynamic for the storyline. It sounds more interesting and gives a better narrative.

I like the inclusion of Lex's name right from the start with the first sentence of option B. It made feel invested right away

I like B because it makes me want to learn more.

After reading the description, option A sounds, feels and suits the title "Rebellion's Martyr", it has fight for the movement of justice. The last line of description is what makes it all difference by mentioning "How?",it is the question which you will get the answer only by reading till the end and makes it curious, suspense and interesting.

This one makes me want to read it more because the info flows better, specifically having info about Lex and their family in the first sentence. Also, the ending being a question is more intriguing.

The last line makes you think about the story a little more and draws you in.

I think option B makes the plot of the book more clear

I like the digital aspect much better than the potential real life scenario of a disease

It leaves more to contemplate when ended with a question.

I like that the synopsis ends in a question. It makes me want to read on and learn how the story would progress.