{"app_id":"fyv2a0qw"}

Head-to-head

Poll complete
50 people answered in 1 day.
50 US-based respondentsMenPeople interested in camping/fishing/huntingJune 7, 2021Public
June 7, 2021Public

Q: Which product would you rather buy? Why?

Head-to-head poll

Statistically significant
PickFu winner
A option image
A
41 votes

82%
2nd place
B option image
B
9 votes

18%

AI Summary

We’re still gathering data. Your AI summary will be automatically generated after your poll completes, please check back in a few minutes.

Ask PickFu

Ask natural language questions about your poll to our custom AI engine. Don’t worry, it’s friendly.

Log in as poll owner to use Ask PickFu.
Response flags
0
Keywords
19
15
14
13


Gender identity
2
48
Racial or ethnic identity
3
6
4
36
1
Education level
1
5
6
25
13
Political affiliation
21
13
16
Amazon Prime member
49
1
U.S. geographic region
5
4
16
8
2
15
Employment status
2
2
5
41
Age range
14
21
8
6
1
Interested in camping / fishing / hunting
50
A
41 responses
A

For a hard rifle case, this description is easier to read with the spacing between the descriptions and I like the use of the logos for dimensions

A

I think that option A is more manageable and easier to read. I would be more likely to buy this product because I would be more likely to read the description.

A

I prefer Option A because not only is it an American business but also provides a 100 percent satisfaction guarantee with lifetime warranty so you have solid protection behind the product.

A

A uses fewer words to communicate the most important information about the product.

A

I prefer option A because it's direct and to the point. Each line contains an important product specification and the spacing between each bullet point allows you to easily transition to the next point.

A

I like how informative, simple, and easy to read option A is. I think it is easy to understand and is more direct about what the product is and offers.

A

Option A clearly posts the facts about the item. The other one feels like a sales pitch.

A

Short and to the point, no information lacking but no fluff either.

A

I like the spaces between the descriptions of option A. I found the description of the gun case of option A is easier to read.

A

I like how this one gives short and clear information of the specifics and attributes of the product. I feel like I can make an inform decision with this one.

A

I really like option it’s very descriptive. It short sweet into the point. It’s easy to read and easy to understand.

A

A sticks to the facts and does not use exaggerated language which feels annoying to me.

A

the other one is just a BIG wall of text and I dont like that at all

A

This one give me similar same information but just in a format that is easier to read.

A

The paragraphs spaced out more in A make it easier to know or see that 100% satisfaction is guarnateed

A

simpler is always better - I do not need all the superlatives and capitalizations to make a point. just say what needs to be said.

A

This one is much more to the point, easy to read, simple but still does a great job selling the features

A

I like option A better because the description of the product is more to the point.

A

A sounds more appealing and premium to me and is spaced properly to read which makes me more engaged in this product and learning about it

A

I like A because it has good points that are easy to read quickly. B is a little more heavy with text.

A

I like the brevity of option A much more than the wordy language in option B

A

I like option A the best because of the American based business statement and lifetime warranty.

A

always go with the simpler version as you know people will not really read any thing too long.

A

information displayed with more space, easier to read

A

I think that Item A is much easier to read. The extra line in-between bullets help it to be skimable. It gets all of the points across without a novel.

A

The description was more concise, communicated the same information with less fluff and sales tactics

A

Option A has less text and more white space. The icons with the arrows also helps readers with pointing out a valid point of info.

A

I like option A because the description is cleaner looking and is easier to read.

A

This option was a bit more succinct in conveying the same information, and let the facts do the selling. The other option wasn't bad though.

A

option A is easier to comprehend and process the info.

A

I like how this option has the weight listed in the description. The list of features was also more concise.

A

the spacing between bullets make it easier to read. Starting out "Hard rifle case..." is key. all information and no overly wordy

A

I liked A better but I feel each could use what the other had. I like the headers in A and the information as basic as it was. I think it catches the eye better and looks more professional. I do like the detail that B has and wish A would go into more detail like that.

A

I think choice A gives a proper description with much less information to wade through than B. If it can be said in fewer words, it's much easier to digest.

A

I think the labels are better and less dense, so I was able to process the information better.

A

since the included description is perfect and has all the relative aspects

A

the whitespacing on the item A makes it much more easy to read without having to do extra focusing.

A

I'm guessing that the point of this exercise is to choose which ad layout is most likely to produce a sale. The difference is clear in that the option I chose is much easier to read and understand based solely on the formatting and succinct manner in which the information is presented.

A

I like how A is broken up better. It allows me to digest the information in a less confusing manner.

A

Option A was much more streamlined and sleek. The dimensions and properties of the case were much better explained and made me want to buy the product in question.

A

The text is spaced out and it's easier to process.

B
9 responses
B

A is much more detailed, which makes it stand out to me

B

I voted for b because the discription seems to read out better information on the product.

B

I like option B here more. Sounds like the shell is premium grade here. The water and dustproof design is fabulous too. Good to use this as the choice for the description for this product. I'll go with option B here.

B

I like that B comes with wheels and handles. Good for transporting!

B

I like that product b has wheels and is other wise similar in many ways

B

I prefer Option A because they are simple and elegant. But because of the nature of the product Option B is the correct choice.

B

This case is using stainless steel which I think makes it a more durable case. I would buy it based on the stainless steel reinforced construction.

B

I like B because how it has employed TSA employees to help build it. If there is anyone that would know what kind of specs to have a durable yet convenient bag it would be a TSA employe. I like the layout and spacing of t=option A, it reads better.

B

I prefer the descriptions of B, but I'd like to see the bullet points spaced out like in A as it makes it easier to read.

Subscribe to PickFu+ to unlock AI highlights on every poll.

Or, unlock AI features for this poll as a one-time $29 add-on.

AI analysis (sample data)

Unearth more insights with a detailed poll report, discovering what respondents liked, disliked, and what to do next.

Survey Analysis

Winning Option: Characteristics and Appeal

  • Option B emerged as the preferred brand packaging design, securing 12 out of 15 votes. Respondents frequently highlighted its aesthetic appeal, emphasizing the luxurious and high-quality impression it conveys. The ability to stack packages was a notable practical advantage mentioned by participants.
  • Several respondents appreciated the monochrome color scheme of Option B, which they found less overwhelming compared to more colorful designs. This preference for simplicity suggests that minimalistic designs may resonate well with this group.
  • Additionally, environmental considerations played a role in favoring Option B; some participants noted its reduced plastic usage and recyclability as attractive features.

Key Topics Across Options

  1. Aesthetic Appeal: Across both options, aesthetics were crucial in influencing preferences. Participants often referred to colors and overall design quality when justifying their choices.

  2. Environmental Concerns: Both options had respondents who valued environmentally friendly aspects of packaging. However, while Option A was praised for being reusable and eco-friendly by some, others perceived Option B’s reduced plastic use as more sustainable.

  3. Practicality: Practical elements such as ease of stacking (Option B) or suitability for travel (Option B) were significant factors in decision-making processes.

Hypotheses for Further Testing

  • Investigate whether minimalistic designs consistently outperform colorful ones across different demographic groups or product categories.

  • Explore if environmental messaging on packaging significantly influences consumer preference when compared with other attributes like luxury perception or practicality.

  • Assess how important stacking capability is relative to other functional benefits in various contexts such as home storage versus travel convenience.

These hypotheses can guide further research into understanding deeper consumer motivations behind packaging preferences observed in this survey context.

AI themes (sample data)

Learn what respondents like and dislike about your poll based on sentiments analyzed by our AI.
A

Likes (sample data)

  • Sleek and modern design
  • Large ear cup sizes for comfort
  • Minimalist and streamlined look

Dislikes (sample data)

  • Lack of unique features or standout elements
  • White color may get dirty easily
  • Not as much cushioning as other options
B

Likes (sample data)

  • (Note: There were no positive mentions specific to Option B in the provided survey answers)

Dislikes (sample data)

  • (Note: There were no negative mentions specific to Option B in the provided survey answers)
C

Likes (sample data)

  • Unique and stylish metallic grating design
  • Sturdy and flexible build
  • 'Cool' aesthetic appeal

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'Weird' or unpleasant cone shape for earmuffs
  • 'Odd' overall appearance with metallic accents
  • (Note: Third negative mention not available from provided survey answers)
D

Likes (sample data)

  • Comfortable and sturdy design
  • Aesthetic appeal, including color options
  • Familiarity with the brand's quality

Dislikes (sample data)

  • Negative perception of the brand logo
  • Smaller ear size perceived as less comfortable
  • Design not preferred compared to others
E

Likes (sample data)

  • Sleek, modern, and professional look
  • Comfortable fit with larger ear sections that cup the ears well
  • Minimalist and clean black aesthetic

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'Flat' appearance perceived as less comfortable by some
  • 'Bulky' design disliked by a few respondents
  • Narrower piece near headband' not appealing to all users
F

Likes (sample data)

  • 'Cushiony padding' for comfort over long periods of use
  • 'Solid build' making it durable and secure on the head/ears
  • Preferred neutral colors like black for headphones

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'Large ear covering' may be too big for some users’ preferences
  • 'Separation of controls/buttons' not liked by everyone
  • 'Chrome accent rings on headband' not appealing to all respondents
G

Likes (sample data)

  • Design perceived as high quality and appealing
  • Liked the color, especially the blue
  • Thin padding was appreciated

Dislikes (sample data)

  • Looked flimsy to some respondents
  • Perceived as less sturdy compared to other options
  • Color preference for white or black over blue
H

Likes (sample data)

  • Modern and high-quality appearance with a white design
  • Comfortable padding on headband and ears
  • Sleek and neutral look preferred by many

Dislikes (sample data)

  • 'White' color seen as prone to getting dirty easily
  • 'Large ear cups' might be problematic for glasses wearers over long periods of use
  • 'Sturdy design' could be considered bulky by some users