The briefer which held my attention is better. Short and sweet.

The description of option A was shorter but also had the most impact with it's opening sentence. I also found myself wanting to learn more after reading option A.

A is more concise while still getting the same amount of information across

Option A seems more appropriate due to the size of the synopsis for such a scenario compared to option B

I feel like the language in this description is more reflective of your genre. This is a horror novel, not a superhero adventure. I also feel liek providing a little less detail in the description makes it more mysterious and interesting.

I like how this version sets up an immediate threat. The tension and suspense really makes me want to keep reading. It's written with a sense of urgency and mystery.

The description in Option A grabs and keeps my attention due to the more appealing word choice. I especially like the short, but very effective first sentence in the first paragraph, as well as the last sentence in the first paragraph which makes me want to find out more information.

I would be slightly more interested in option A because I think it provides a coherent description for the book that makes me want to learn more about it and would likely make me interested enough to read it.

I thought the excerpt in option A was a lot more interesting.

I prefer A, espeically the way is starts out "The horris is real" makes it sound exciting and you want to read more after reading the first sentence. Also I like the last paragraph comparing it to other books, so you have a better idea of what it is about after comparing it to "Inferno" and "Contagion"

I chose A because I liked how it showed how another book and a movie were similar to this book and made me think that if I liked those, I'd like this book.

I chose option A because of how the tone of the summary pulls you in without giving away too much. It's a perfect description whereas option B feels like it's giving away the whole plot and makes readers lose interest in the book

The opening sentence for description "A" grabs the readers interest as it portrays an intense story line convincing the consumer to purchase the book and learn what happens.

A sounds more interesting and easier to follow. I like the beginning and the ending that summarized the topic.

Because option A goes straight to the point and describes everything in short and brief details unlike option B which seems to be repeating the same matter a number of times.

I thought A was a lot catchier, felt more conversational in tone, and felt clearer and less clunky. A did the best job with getting me excited to read the book.

They are both good, though A flows a little better, easier to follow.

Option A is a more short and concise version of B. It should not be that long.

I would choose A, the description sounds better, more intriguing and is not as wordy as the other option.

Option A seems to be better written.

Option B is more detailed and interesting.

I would buy Option B. The description looks interesting and its easy to engage with it when compared to Option A.

I think B seems to use more words that can better visualize the setting and the story. I think A is just a smidge too simplified.

I like that the blurb at the end tells you that their are other books in this series.

It feels slightly more descriptive and suspenseful, which ultimately makes it more appealing.

b because it explains to you that the book is actually part of a series.

Both were good but B is more suspenseful and exciting which I would expect from this type of book.

I would rather buy Option B, as it presents a more intriguing and engaging storyline. The mention of a cult, the theft of holy relics, genetic engineering, and a race against time to stop a chilling terror make it sound like an exciting archaeological thriller.

Option B gives me a little more information about the story. Option B strikes my attention more than option A.

The selection I choose did a better job at inciting feelings instead of just telling me what was happening. It was descriptive and imaginative and drew me into the story.

While it's wordier, I like knowing that it's the 6th in a series, so if I'm unfamiliar with it, I'm able to determine if I want to start here, or go back to the earlier books to catch up. A cross between the two, with shorter detail on the action, but describing the number of books would be the ideal balance.

I like that it says it is the sixth book in a series. That is really important to know before wanting to read this book.

It sounds more exciting and I like that it involves Doomsday and Armageddon.

I chose B because the description was a little more intriguing and mysterious than Option A. Option A read like an adventure movie and felt too fast and action-packed for me.

The additional details provided in option B really made me want to read the story.

I think this one is better, it tells you all about it without making it sound like you had to like the previous book that came out to enjoy it