Book title test marketing poll

50 Respondents General Population

This is a completed book title test marketing poll published on May 1, 2017.

The author received 50 unbiased responses (votes & explanations) from the general population in about about 1 hour.

Using PickFu, authors are able to choose enticing book titles and covers before publishing.

Create Your Own Book Title Test Marketing Poll 

Which book title is more appealing?

Option B

Dumbfounding Adventures! [a comedy adventure series]


35/50 votes

Full Poll Results

Published May 1, 2017
Public

Which book title is more appealing?

50 Respondents General Population

Option A

Very Huge Adventures! [a comedy adventure series]


15 votes
Option B

Dumbfounding Adventures! [a comedy adventure series]


35 votes

Responses

Responses to Option A
1
It's a better title for comedy.
2
Dumbfounded is not good to use.
3
It sounds more exciting and i would want to read this book.
4
I think this one reads easier than Option B.
5
A's wording sounds simpler, I think the word dumbfounding does really fit well on B.
6
I think Option A is more intriguing and just sounds better when you read and/or say it. I think Option A would grab a wider audience of people's attention and get them to check deeper into what the book has to offer. I also think it is more unique and unlike other titles we have heard before, which would make it more appealing.
7
I don't really like Dumbfounding...doesn't roll off the tongue
8
Both sound good but Option A is a bit more interesting to me.
9
Sounds funnier, and perhaps a dig at the president.
10
"Very Huge" is more humorous.
11
I like the word Huge
12
sounds more fun
13
Sounds more interesting than "B".
14
I find it a funnier title, probably because of the current US president and his habit of saying "huge" like "yuge" so in my head I read it "Very Yuge Adventures!" which I found hilarious.
15
Dumbfounding isn't used much anymore and may be misunderstood.
Responses to Option B
1
sounds more interesting than 'very huge'
2
They're both bad.
3
It sounds more adult
4
B sounds more interesting
5
The wording of option A is very strange.
6
It just sounds more like something I would pick up.
7
dumbfounding is more interesting than "huge," and would imply something really astounding.
8
Very huge is elementary
9
A reminds me of Trump and I stay away from anything that reminds me of Trump.
10
Dumbfounding is an interesting word I just do not see very often.
11
A sounds like something Trump would say, and I wouldn't watch it because of that
12
It's a better titile
13
it is just basic
14
Very huge adventures just sounds so simple and primitive.
15
more imaginative choice of words
16
Rolls off the tongue (or mind) much easier.
17
The alternative "very huge adventures" sounds too simplified and cliche by comparison.
18
It seems more interesting with that title.
19
Very Huge makes me think of trump which is unappealing
20
It is a more unique title. More exciting.
21
It just sounds like it would be funnier.
22
B sounds like it would be funnier
23
The title looks fun
24
Hopefully some of the characters move on in their lives in this show.
25
the other option needs better adjectives
26
title is captivating
27
"Dumbfounding" is intriguing, but "Very Huge" is generic and less interesting.
28
This seems like more of a funny name.
29
I chose B, because I think that title sounds a little more original.
30
It sounds like it would be interesting and engaging.
31
the name rolls better
32
This seems more fun then "Very big"
33
I don't really like either one, but I think this one is a little better.
34
Option B sounds more interesting and sounds more likely to be comedic.
35
Option A sounds awkward and the title doesn't imply it is about comedy adventures.

Demographics

Gender
Male (0%)
TraitPercentage
Male (0%)0
Female (0%)0
Age
3-17 (0%)
TraitPercentage
3-17 (0%)0
18-34 (0%)0
35-49 (0%)0
50-64 (0%)0
65+ (0%)0
Income
$0-30k (0%)
TraitPercentage
$0-30k (0%)0
$30-60k (0%)0
$60-100k (0%)0
$100k+ (0%)0
Ethnicity
White (0%)
TraitPercentage
White (0%)0
Black (0%)0
Asian (0%)0
Hispanic (0%)0
Other (0%)0
Education
High School (0%)
TraitPercentage
High School (0%)0
College (0%)0
Grad School (0%)0
Gender for Option A
Male (0%)
TraitPercentage
Male (0%)0
Female (0%)0
Gender for Option B
Male (0%)
TraitPercentage
Male (0%)0
Female (0%)0
Age for Option A
3-17 (0%)
TraitPercentage
3-17 (0%)0
18-34 (0%)0
35-49 (0%)0
50-64 (0%)0
65+ (0%)0
Age for Option B
3-17 (0%)
TraitPercentage
3-17 (0%)0
18-34 (0%)0
35-49 (0%)0
50-64 (0%)0
65+ (0%)0
Income for Option A
$0-30k (0%)
TraitPercentage
$0-30k (0%)0
$30-60k (0%)0
$60-100k (0%)0
$100k+ (0%)0
Income for Option B
$0-30k (0%)
TraitPercentage
$0-30k (0%)0
$30-60k (0%)0
$60-100k (0%)0
$100k+ (0%)0
Ethnicity for Option A
White (0%)
TraitPercentage
White (0%)0
Black (0%)0
Asian (0%)0
Hispanic (0%)0
Other (0%)0
Ethnicity for Option B
White (0%)
TraitPercentage
White (0%)0
Black (0%)0
Asian (0%)0
Hispanic (0%)0
Other (0%)0
Education for Option A
High School (0%)
TraitPercentage
High School (0%)0
College (0%)0
Grad School (0%)0
Education for Option B
High School (0%)
TraitPercentage
High School (0%)0
College (0%)0
Grad School (0%)0

A

Votes by demographic segment

B


Gender
25%
Male (20)
75%
33%
Female (30)
66%

Age
-
3-17 (None)
-
19%
18-34 (26)
80%
33%
35-49 (18)
66%
66%
50-64 (6)
33%
-
65+ (None)
-

Income
26%
$0-30k (15)
73%
41%
$30-60k (17)
58%
16%
$60-100k (12)
83%
33%
$100k+ (6)
66%

Ethnicity
28%
White (45)
71%
100%
Black (1)
0%
33%
Asian (3)
66%
-
Hispanic (None)
-
0%
Other (1)
100%

Education
57%
High School (7)
42%
32%
College (31)
67%
8%
Grad School (12)
91%
Loading