Travel frequency audience targeting

This is a 4 option poll with 100 respondents targeting Personal income range ($101k+, $61 100k), Age range (25 34, 35 44, 45 54, 55 64, 65+), and Travel frequency (Often, Occasionally). A sample of responses:

• The collage showing a few different views definitely gets my attention the most. Then I like the firepit and bathroom with the pool table last.
• All of these are super appealing, so I prefer the picture that includes many photos.
• Option C is so much fun with outdoor furniture, lights and firepit!! Option D shows lots of pictures of rental. but doesn't pull in me in. Options A and B only show one picture which is not pulling me in.
• When I am thinking of a cabin, I want to be outside. My top 2 choices show the outside best. The pool room is also a good picture and interests me too.
• This setting gives me a very good idea of the vibe and look of the place all in one image.

This is a 2 option poll with 50 respondents targeting Travel frequency (Often). A sample of responses:

• I really prefer option B I think the zinc metal plating adds a really beautiful contrast to the building and gifts it more of a expensive ambience . I think that option A which is the limestone Just looks more plain and generic. Option B just looks really amazing very elegant and it looks kind of like it might have a nice patina Once it ages.
• I chose option B because I like that the zinc coated metal stands out and is a contract to the rest of the building. I think it looks nice and it different than every other building.
• Lime washed brick is a nice look for this hotel. This looks better I feel and fits in with New Orleans a bit better. Good look for this here and that just feels more in tune with New Orleans.
• Lime wash has more life to it, steel looks so cold and dead
• Lime washed brick blends in better with the rest of the design of the hotel, so I prefer Option A to Option B.

This is a 2 option poll with 15 respondents targeting Travel frequency (Often). A sample of responses:

• I like that it states going through the process is so time limited. It is less of a time investment so I would be more likely to click.
• I would not choose the orange button for this item as it really does not give enough information in the ad about what the program charges, prior to setting up the account.
• It lets you know the estimated time that the process will take. The other option is pretty open-ended.
• I like B better. I would Be more likely to click on it because I like the fact that it says two minutes and I know it’s not gonna be a really long drawn out ordeal. The service looks really interesting
• I wouldn't click on either one, I'm a large guy and usually off the beaten path type things don't work out well for me.

This is a 2 option poll with 15 respondents targeting Travel frequency (Often). A sample of responses:

• Option A sounds better as begin the adventure sounds cooler and just sounds like it will be the start of something bigger, while B sounds more boring because of the test.
• I don't see much difference in the two ads. I would likely not click on the button because I prefer to travel with people that I already know.
• This service is similar to things I like 4 out of 5 stars the ad quality could be a little better.
• I like option A more because its shorter and easy to know what i would be going to rad about
• i like A the most is simple and talks about adventure. the other one is not bad just too long you need something short and sweet

This is a 2 option poll with 15 respondents targeting Travel frequency (Often). A sample of responses:

• B really pops and I feel the old VA pulls me in and makes me want to find out more.
• The other image is too crowded and busy, I'm more likely to look at the simpler one
• Option A would be my choice because of the three people that it shows and their information. It adds to the credibility.
• B is much cleaner and to the point. A has too much noise going on and makes me less interested.
• I would be more likely to click on option B because I think that it has a more interesting, eye-catching, and visually appealing image/advertisement.

This is a 4 option poll with 50 respondents targeting Travel frequency (Occasionally, Often), Personal income range ($31 60k, $61 100k, $101k+), Gender identity (Female), and Age range (25 34, 45 54, 35 44). A sample of responses:

• I think C is the best because it refers to being a premium brand when you mention the word stylish.
• Women are fearless. Especially women in power.
• I like option C and D the best. They seem to grab my attention the best before option B and A, those seem kind of plain to me.
• I chose option D because it tells me what I need to let go of. It gives me direction so I know that I need to move on.
• I like the deeper meaning to choice D. Options B & C we’re both easy to remember which I also liked. A may have been too long to stick well.

This is a 0 option poll with 15 respondents targeting Travel frequency (Often). A sample of responses:

• Firstly, this question is an abuse of Pickfu and garbage. If I have to explain - Feb 21 9:30Fly from Amsterdam (AMS)Feb 21 10:30Arrive in Rome (FCO)The above is my choice. I chose this because it is the cheapest. I do not want any amenities nor do I care, just something cheap. The rest I would manage myself. I would never subscribe, and if I had to, only $5 a month would be acceptable, therefore $60 maximum in a year.
• Since i do not travel that often, i find the whole subscription-based idea usrless to me, and would not spend my money kn it.
• I do not use third party travel sites to book travel because of past experiences in not being able to change reservations.
• I received only two options on the page. I'd choose the $700 flight that routes through Rome since this is the cheapest flight. I'd pay $150 per year for this and 200+ would be outrageous to me.
• I chose the cheapest option because it was cheapest. I would not pay to subscribe to this because the best airfares should be open to everyone at no cost.

This is a 0 option poll with 15 respondents targeting Travel frequency (Often). A sample of responses:

• I'll just stick with the direct flight of $1,000
• I would choose the $700 deal because I get more benefits from that one for a few dollars more so I feel its well worth the extra
• I would select the $600 flight through Rome to get to New York. Not only is it the cheapest, but it also has the best timing for arrival.
• I would choose the cheapest option since I don't mind additional layovers as long as it saves me sufficient money.
• I'd pick the $610 option. I value a cheaper trip and I don't want any frills or anything planned for me as I'd rather pay more to have control over those activities myself.

This is a 0 option poll with 15 respondents targeting Travel frequency (Often). A sample of responses:

• I would go with the cheapest option which includes a 4 hour wait. I enjoy hanging out at airports and think the cost difference versus direct is enough to wait around. I do not want to leave the airport and did not like the second option at all, would feel too stressed.
• I would choose the middle option, as it would be a lot less expensive and still be able to successfully complete my intent.
• It's interesting to offer something to do while on a layover as part of your travel plans. However, I don't think the listed items would be able to fit in the time frame of 30mins as preesented on site. It did however make me think of travel and layovers in a different way.
• I really like the fact that it gives you many options. Also like the fact with a layover it provides options for dinner with pickup. from an Italian or you can just choose to stay at the airport. The difference in prices for a layover is extremely appealing if you aren't in a hurry to return to New York.
• I really like the fact that it looks like it checks multiple sites for multiple discounts all in one area. I think the information if presented in a straight forward way with an easy to read format.