Interest in hiking audience targeting

This is a 2 option poll with 50 respondents targeting Interest in hiking (Yes). A sample of responses:

• this couple is #goals. it's very aspirational
• It has a more personal, human touch.
• this one they seemed like they are having alot of fun
• The vibrancy of A stands out to me. I like how it makes me want to look to see what they are looking at.
• Like them hugging. makes it lovable

This is a 2 option poll with 50 respondents targeting Interest in hiking (Yes). A sample of responses:

• I know what a selfie stick is used for, so the other image descriptions don't really seem necessary to me. This one makes more sense to me.
• B has a nice design and overall superior layout.
• i like option A the most out of these options
• I would be inclined to purchase A, which comes with the backpack and chair combination. I find this is more practical of an accessory for trekking poles compared to a selfie stick.
• I like the one that shows the bag and other things that are part of it like its uses

This is a 3 option poll with 50 respondents targeting Age range (25 34, 35 44), Personal income range ($61 100k), Gender identity (Male), and Interest in hiking (Yes). A sample of responses:

• the naming is a bit weird but the color combination of Oatmeal and Navy is extremely pretty and a great color combination. It gives it that sunset dusk kinda feel that makes it seem warmer!
• I liked choice A since the yellow on the socks look appealing while grabbing my interest. Choices B and C look too generic and aren't appealing to look at since they are more plain color combinations.
• i like the the lighter color. i think it is nic and ahppy looking
• I do not like the yellow look of A. I think the solid gray and blue/black works best
• I ranked the designs of the hiking socks that I liked the most. I found the oatmeal/navy color to be the most appealing followed by the bone/black socks color and then finally the glacier blues design.

This is a 7 option poll with 50 respondents targeting Amazon Prime member (Yes), Age range (25 34), and Interest in hiking (Yes). A sample of responses:

• option D description as appealing to people with environmental concerns, option C makes a product more enticing because of a high number of people have experienced the product, option A many people purchase products that are from a particular brand, option B price is a big factor when I am considering to buy a product, option F features and benefits also count a lot, option G I would consider this last when buying.
• I ranked my choices in terms of how they'd affect my purchase directly. It needs to have the features I want and be for a price I like. I will then look at reviews to make sure it's not a complete piece of junk. Warranty would rank next although not as important, followed selfishly by aesthetics (I love the look of clean packaging and a well-designed product). Sustainability is cool, but that's a luxury at this point. Do not care whatsoever about brand.
• O care most about whether the product I'm looking for is green. I also prefer one with good features.
• I voted based on how appealing the factors were to me compared to the others and which ones I would click on in the real world.
• Most important thing for me for any outdoor furniture or supplies is sustainability if your using it outside you want it to be good for the earth and to last for a long time

This is a 3 option poll with 50 respondents targeting Interest in hiking (Yes). A sample of responses:

• I chose this order because it was the most visually appealing to me.
• i like option c the best. becuase you can see the entire product .
• I like that "C" shows the chopsticks and the case, but not layered on top of each other. It is not too cluttered. I don't like that "A" doesn't show the entire length of the chopsticks.
• I like seeing everything that is included completely visible.
• I would pick C because it shows the product and the packaging.

This is a 1 option poll with 50 respondents targeting Interest in hiking (Yes). A sample of responses:

• Hiking boots with attachable skates? Not for me. Those seem like different use cases. I could seeing someone who does warehouse work using something like this - where they are in a hurry but still need to wear boots.
• nice product with multiple attachments. Its really interesting and i want to have one
• I would prefer to buy roller skates, ice hockey skates or figure skates separately as a single unit because the product is likely to be more durable and functional if it is not just slapped on the bottom of some hiking boots that have no business skating around.
• I am simply too old to need/want. But over all, generally have found something designed to do one thing will do it better than something designed to do numerous.
• I don't know if I was hiking if I would need roller skates or Ice skates

This is a 1 option poll with 50 respondents targeting Interest in hiking (Yes). A sample of responses:

• This would be very helpful. If it was detailed and accurate and not boring it would be perfect.
• I love spending time in the outdoors and would really appreciate an app that lets me get acquainted with the outdoors to help me plan my adventures in advance.
• I grew up on 98 acres of forested land. I can appreciate why people take tours when hiking, but if you're checking you phone repeatedly because of notifications, then you're not really appreciating nature. When someone is talking and providing a tour, it's easier to listen and still see and appreciate nature. Now, if a parent wants their kids to think that they know a lot, they might find this useful. I personally wouldn't recommend it. Instead, I would recommend that the person planning on taking the hike thoroughly research the site beforehand and make note of things they want to point out on the trail. A better app would be one that offers emergency assistance on a trail and warns of emergencies happening as they occur (i.e. predator sightings, weather turning foul, etc). The app would provide an immediate connection to forest rangers or emergency services or perhaps points out locations where hikers can hydrate. That's far more valuable.
• It's an interesting idea for an app, and I say that as someone that likes natural hikes and similar outings. The idea itself sounds promising, and at a reasonable price, I'd be very interested. However, there's one obvious issue with this app that I'd absolutely have to know more about before buying into it. That would be the obvious need to have wireless access to take advantage of it, which seems suspect since a lot of the places where you'd use this are, naturally, going to be in rural areas where coverage can be non-existent or spotty. This app would have to have good coverage for it to actually be worth it, and on top of that, it would probably be handy to have a list of destinations that do have coverage so you can check app usage before going. Getting there and finding out post-fact it's of no benefit would be very frustrating.
• i think that this app would be helpful if i was touring unknown locations, im not sure how annoying it would be to get those notifications though or if id want to watch a video while im out and about however a decent amount of this seems to be more beneficial then annoying

This is a 2 option poll with 50 respondents targeting Interest in hiking (Yes). A sample of responses:

• I like the question at the beginning of A. It gives the description a little more personality
• I think I prefer it just to be straight to the point rather than asking me questions.
• A is much better because it has a compelling headline
• I like choice B the best. I love the name of it and how detailed the description is.
• I chose B because I like product descriptions that are more to the point. B starts off with facts, nothing else. A on the other hand begins with a cliché and an assumption about my tastes. I find this practice very obnoxious and one that needs to end in product descriptions and advertising.

This is a 2 option poll with 50 respondents targeting Interest in hiking (Yes). A sample of responses:

• They're pretty similar in how they're worded but A is would definitely be worth checking out for the lifetime warranty alone
• this is not a title. titles are short. this is a description. if this is a title i would skip right over it because they can't make it succinct. this one is marginally better though i suppose.
• The lifetime warranty on option A was the difference maker for me.
• Option A is better, as it mentions that it has a lifetime warranty which is good
• A because if I'm using a product to do outdoor stuff, I want a lifetime warranty in case it breaks.

This is a 2 option poll with 50 respondents targeting Interest in hiking (Yes). A sample of responses:

• I like that it is a bit shorter, and uses the term take HD pics.
• They are both very wordy, but I like option a better. Option b has some technical jargon in it that I don’t care for.
• I would click on this first because I think it sounds more simple and easy to understand. There are not any words that are wasted in the description. It just gets right to the point which I like
• I'm actually more interested in a product that is being marketed as easy to use for adults and kids (or just people of all ages) rather than receiving it in a custom box that I will possibly just throw away.
• Both seem fine, i just feel that option B sounds a little more professional due to the wording.