Crowdfunding Participation Audience Targeting

This is a 2 option poll with 50 respondents targeting Crowdfunding Participation (Yes). A sample of responses:

• This one is a tough choice, they both feel pretty intriguing to me. A wins out in the end since the terminology used in the beginning sounds just a bit more credible at a glance.
• Option A seems informative, option B sounds like it's a story about an illegal fundraiser("hands dirty") to combat other illegal things.
• Option A is better because there is no confusion about the title: the book is about a fundraising campaign. With option B, the title is not only strange, but it could have negative connotations: someone getting their hands dirty usually means they committed a crime. I suspect you meant that the fundraising was done by having people put in manual labor, but that's why the title is confusing at the same time.
• Feel like it is speaking to me more.
• I prefer dissected because it shows what the book will do as far as fundraising.

This is a 2 option poll with 50 respondents targeting Crowdfunding Participation (Yes). A sample of responses:

• The images all look too much the same (all rectangular shapes) in Option A. The icons in the series section in Option B stand out more because they're non-rectangular and not like the other images.
• I like the boxed pictures for the three subtopics below the main part of the page.
• I prefer this option because I like the whole screen to have graphics. It is easir to navigate and makes the screen look more complete and uniform
• i think that the pictures are better than the icons because it looks more interesting to the general public.
• The icons in B effectively get the point across while allowing for transparency around them, which, to my eye, makes the whitespace flow better and draws the eye to the actual information(text) more effectively.

This is a 2 option poll with 50 respondents targeting Crowdfunding Participation (Yes). A sample of responses:

• This sounds more like what it does
• This name embraces the concept of a smartphone holder better than the Carbon name and best conveys the item's function.
• Carbon is just a better sounding name.
• neither really excite me but if i had to choose it would be this one
• I liked the name better than B

This is a 3 option poll with 50 respondents targeting Crowdfunding Participation (Yes). A sample of responses:

• this looks more modern
• I like how the logo, the K looking thing, looks more like the brand
• choice A has better spacing on the font
• Again the letters on b stand out better than a.
• Option A looks more high end

This is a 1 option poll with 50 respondents targeting Crowdfunding Participation (Yes). A sample of responses:

• yes nice idea . nylon table tennis racket buy TT balls
• This seems like a good idea as long as it's not too cumbersome to reach into the bag to pick out a ball without dropping more balls on the floor or having trouble keeping the bag from tipping over.
• Yes, I think this is a good idea. It would be a useful product that would make playing table tennis easier. I honestly am surprised someone hasn't already come up with that. The only problem I see is making the bags far enough from the edge of the table that they wouldn't bump the knees of the person playing if they squatted down a bit while standing right at the edge of the table. Maybe the bags should be at the side of each end instead of at the actual end where the player stands.
• A good idea? Yes. But there are plenty of substitutes and DIY options that I think actually /making/ this product is a bad idea.
• I think it is a good idea especially if you are a good player. The balls are so light, and they get dented and cracked. This way at the start of each game you start off fresh with a pristine ball. You could also use it to grab a new ball mid game too if one becomes damaged or goes out of bounds. Any dents or pings will make it bounce in a haphazard manner that isn't really fair to either player. I think this is a great idea.