Crowdfunding participant audience targeting

This is a 2 option poll with 50 respondents targeting Crowdfunding participant (Yes). A sample of responses:

• The different wording in B makes it more interesting.
• more creative and engaging
• It is shorter and makes more sense.
• seems like a more explicit option
• Feel like it is speaking to me more.

This is a 2 option poll with 50 respondents targeting Crowdfunding participant (Yes). A sample of responses:

• Easier to see more quickly with the icons (of the microphone, etc).
• i think that the pictures are better than the icons because it looks more interesting to the general public.
• I like the boxed pictures for the three subtopics below the main part of the page.
• The icons in B effectively get the point across while allowing for transparency around them, which, to my eye, makes the whitespace flow better and draws the eye to the actual information(text) more effectively.
• I prefer this option because I like the whole screen to have graphics. It is easir to navigate and makes the screen look more complete and uniform

This is a 2 option poll with 50 respondents targeting Crowdfunding participant (Yes). A sample of responses:

• not a fan of numbers in the middle of names.
• sounds way cooler to me
• This sounds like it would be easier to install. The carbon name tells me nothing but it sounds "hard" as carbon is an element. You can do choice "A" in a "snap."
• It sounds far cooler
• I liked the name better than B

This is a 3 option poll with 50 respondents targeting Crowdfunding participant (Yes). A sample of responses:

• I like how the logo, the K looking thing, looks more like the brand
• this looks more modern
• Again the letters on b stand out better than a.
• Option A looks more high end
• choice A has better spacing on the font

This is a 1 option poll with 50 respondents targeting Crowdfunding participant (Yes). A sample of responses:

• I feel like it would look silly (like balls)
• Yes. It is a good idea.
• Yes it is a good idea. Nice to just have the balls right there instead of chasing one around.
• This is a great idea. That's one of the biggest problems of table tennis- always having the balls go everywhere and having to stop the game to pick them up before resuming play.
• It might be but it must be priced very cheaply

This is a 1 option poll with 50 respondents targeting Crowdfunding participant (Yes). A sample of responses:

• No, it is an unattractive and practical product, limited to only the use shown in the video.
• I think that it is sligthly on the higher side of the price range i would pay. It really would depend on the qaulity. It looks to me more like a $12 -15 product. I know my wife and kids would like this but I just do not see at as $24 unless it is really well made.
• I probably would not pay for this product because I find it a little cumbersome and not very portable to take with you. I have an ipad and a very portable case and can place it in all different kinds of angles and positions and paid 17 dollars. I think if it were a little more versatile then I would.
• I can figure out a free way to do that with a pillow so thats a no for me
• Definitely not. The highest I would buy this is $20. It's just a small cushion.

This is a 1 option poll with 50 respondents targeting Crowdfunding participant (Yes). A sample of responses:

• I like that it shows you how you can use it and what it does. I thought it was descriptive
• I like the video in the first place, it is fun and informative. I do like the product. It looks very useful and practical.
• I really liked this video. I think this amount would be correct for this product
• I like the video -- the woman seems fun and she shows a lot of personality. However, I probably wouldn't buy the product, although it seems useful. I'm really concerned about having such strong magnets that close to pricy electronics. Maybe you could add something explaining the product's safety? I'm assuming the magnets aren't strong enough to hurt phones, tablets, etc. but I'd like to see that acknowledged.
• I would pay the amount listed for this product at 25 dollars. I honestly believe this is a bargain price because I would think this product would cost more than the asking price. I would use this product everyday when I go to bed. It would get everyday use so I would feel like I am getting a bang for my bucks.

This is a 2 option poll with 50 respondents targeting Crowdfunding participant (Yes) and Interest in gardening (Yes). A sample of responses:

• Seems to relate better to the product and to automation/internet like smart phones.
• The name of the company in option B seems better to fit the description of what the company does.
• I chose B because it is more descriptive of what the business actually is (Smart=relating to the internet, -ponics=relating to hydroponic growing).
• I like option A the best because I like how growrs is a play on the word growers.
• The image was a bit lighter and more appealing visually.

This is a 1 option poll with 50 respondents targeting Crowdfunding participant (Yes) and Cat owner (Yes). A sample of responses:

• I think B and would just leave it as it is.
• I like the design of C. It feels like royalty in some way. Heating would be the best option in my opinion, as my cats love to be in a warm place like over a heat vent.
• I prefer C. I think having something for the cat to scratch or something hanging for them to bat at would be nice
• I like the little colums on A and the color of it but like the design with the family crest on C. I wish it were the same color as A though. Heated pad inside would be nice for my cat but it would need an outside light so that I know if the heater is on or off. Maybe just a warm and super fuzzy fleece though due to a fire hazard.
• I think that C looks really cool with the coat of arms so that would probably be my first choice.

This is a 4 option poll with 100 respondents targeting Crowdfunding participant (Yes). A sample of responses:

• Since the headline appears to be straightforward, I favor option B'.
• I think including the word "conversion" does a better job conveying what the product is used for.
• A is plain and simple. C seems bragging and d and b are just ok
• I prefer Option D because I think it makes it the most clear it is a conversion kit versus a new product. Option B is my least favorite because the subtitle isn't creative or intriguing at all.
• I think it should be included that it's a conversion kit